On 9 Jun 1998 20:38:11 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>Have you bothered to file a bug report into the Debian Bug System
>about this? Then it can be fixed you know ..
No. This was before I used Debian that I noticed it and also does not
relate to my Debian system as it is on my ISP's s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
>It is just personal bias on my part against qpopper because of one
>glaring oversight they made. In the non-standard (IIRC) pop send feature,
>which I do use fr
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
>I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper. I
>haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
>problem is with that daemon. My Debian machine is serving 600 or so
>dial-up connections for ma
I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper. I
haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
problem is with that daemon. My Debian machine is serving 600 or so
dial-up connections for mail (coming and going) and authentication. If I
need to switch for
4 matches
Mail list logo
