--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/f76a4226-161e-4dca-8374-d66811864...@yahoo.co.uk
I managed to get the zip drive recognized in etch by rmmod imm followed by
modprobe imm. I can adjust /etc/fstab but this is strange udev and imm
didn't get this drive started earlier.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:50:10PM -0400, kyle forinash wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I'm not exactly sure what I did to make this (sort of) work; maybe
> downloading mtools did it (I could not get iwlcontainer-lnx-x86-10.tgz
> from Iomega (http://www.iomega.com/software/ ) to work). Anyway I can
> now mo
t; So ... what now?
kyle
------------
Subject:
Re: ZIP drive question..
From:
"Jacob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:11:08 -0500
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:44:53 -0500
"Forinas
the listserv if I figure it out.
>
> kyle
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gayle Lee Fairless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sat 7/24/2004 4:23 PM
> To: Forinash, Kyle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ZIP drive question
> Kyl
Kyle,
Did you ever solve your ZIP drive problem? I have a USB ZIP 250
drive on /dev /sda4.
Since I am subscribling only to the digest to cut down on volume, I
may have missed the resolution.
I downloaded iwlcontainer-lnx-x86-10.tgz from Iomega. It appears to
work for me. I have not fi
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:58:15 -0500
"Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:27:38 -0500
> "Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This zip disk is formatted, isn't it?
>
> Try one more mount command - "mount -t msdos /dev/hdd4 /mnt/zip".
>
> HTH,
> Jacob
> --
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:27:38 -0500
"Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >/home/kyle# /bin/mount /dev/hdd /mnt/zip
> >mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> >/home/kyle# /bin/mount -t vfat /dev/hdd /mnt/zip
> >mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd,
> > o
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:27:38 -0500
"Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >/home/kyle# /bin/mount /dev/hdd /mnt/zip
> >mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> >/home/kyle# /bin/mount -t vfat /dev/hdd /mnt/zip
> >mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd,
> > o
Subject:
Re: ZIP drive question..
From:
"Jacob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:53:37 -0500
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:20:22 -0500
"Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Jacob, thanks for trying to help me out. Here
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:20:22 -0500
"Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jacob, thanks for trying to help me out. Here is what I tried (to
> no avail). How do I know what fs types are available (I tried
> repartitioning the zip as Extended but got the same not supported
> error)? Am I
>
>
>
> Subject:
> Re: ZIP drive question..
> From:
> "Jacob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:11:08 -0500
> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>On Wed, 21 Jul 2004
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 12:11:08PM -0500, Jacob S. wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:44:53 -0500
> "Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi;
> >
> > I'm having a problem mounting a 250Mb internal zip.
> > a.dmesg shows me hdd:IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI FLOPPY
>^^^
On 2004-07-21, Jacob S. penned:
> --Signature=_Wed__21_Jul_2004_12_11_08_-0500_wz0Lp0Pqv4IaNzYy
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:44:53 -0500 "Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:44:53 -0500
"Forinash, Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I'm having a problem mounting a 250Mb internal zip.
> a.dmesg shows me hdd:IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI FLOPPY
^^^
> b.standard mount procedures (edit '/dev/sda4 /mnt/zip auto
> user,
Hi; I’m having a problem mounting a 250Mb internal zip.a. dmesg shows me hdd:IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI FLOPPYb. standard mount procedures (edit ‘/dev/sda4 /mnt/zip auto user,noauto 0 0’ into /etc/fstab followed by mount /mnt/zip) gives: “the kernel does not recognize /dev/sda4 as a block
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 15:18, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> Here it is again.
>
> PC also has a CD-RW drive (internal ATAPI) and the install lilo.conf
> append line was:
>
> append="ramdisk_size=10 lang=en apm=power-off hda=scsi hdb=scsi \
> hdc=scsi hdd=scsi hde=scsi hdf=scsi hdg=scsi hdh=scsi no
Here it is again.
PC also has a CD-RW drive (internal ATAPI) and the install lilo.conf
append line was:
append="ramdisk_size=10 lang=en apm=power-off hda=scsi hdb=scsi \
hdc=scsi hdd=scsi hde=scsi hdf=scsi hdg=scsi hdh=scsi nomce "
and allowed CD-RW to work using ide-scsi interface??
So,
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 13:04, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> It is an IDE internal 100Mb ZIP drive.
> (dmesg | grep ZIP displays->
> hdd: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI DRIVE, ATAPI FLOPPY drive)
>
> When hdd=scsi is removed, system still tries to access it as
> scsi drive.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Could
It is an IDE internal 100Mb ZIP drive.
(dmesg | grep ZIP displays->
hdd: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI DRIVE, ATAPI FLOPPY drive)
When hdd=scsi is removed, system still tries to access it as
scsi drive.
What is the option for this drive to be treated as ide/atapi drive?
hdd=ide and hdd=atapi are treated a
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 09:47, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> System is Debian testing (kernel 2.6.5) installed from Knoppix-3.4
> The PC has a 100Mb ZIP drive in it.
>
> It is detected at boot time (dmesg -> hdd).
>
> Lilo.conf has option hdd=scsi in it..
>
> Attempt to mount the disks in it as
>
>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:49:42AM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
> Subject: Re: zip drive problems...
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:19:45 +0800
> From: Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTE
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: zip drive problems...
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:19:45 +0800
From: Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tuesday July 31 2001 04:57, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:39:47 -070
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Phillip Deackes wrote:
PD> Sometimes the partition you need to access is /dev/sda1 rather than
PD> /dev/sda4. Don't know why, but I have several zip disks, some where the
PD> uabale partition is /dev/sda1 and others where it is /dev/sda4. Maybe it
PD> has something to do with
Hi!
What I should have added, is that I use the USB port. I have built into
the kernel usb-storage, usb-core, ide-scsi, sg, and I amalso running
hotplug, usbutils, modutils. I have a mount point /zip for the drive, and
here is what happens when I start up the system:
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter
On Tuesday July 31 2001 04:57, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:39:47 -0700
>
> Sometimes the partition you need to access is /dev/sda1 rather than
> /dev/sda4. Don't know why, but I have several zip disks, some where the
> uabale partition is /dev/sda1 and others where it is /dev/sd
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:39:47 -0700
"Joern T. Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I try do mount my zip drive
>
> mount /dev/sda4 /zip
>
> I get the message
>
> mount: /dev/sda4 is not a valid block device.
>
> What am I missing.
Sometimes the partition you need to access is /dev/sd
Gilger.John wrote on Mon Jul 30, 2001 at 01:48:34PM:
> Joern T. Larsen:
>> mount: /dev/sda4 is not a valid block device.
>
> 2. Did you add ppa or imm and parport_pc support when you compiled your
> kernal? Or did you insert (insmod) those modules?
... and you need sd_mod as well ...
ppa / imm is
1. Do you have a disk installed?
2. Did you add ppa or imm and parport_pc support when you compiled your
kernal? Or did you insert (insmod) those modules?
3. Does your sysstem recognize the zip drive on boot?
John Gilger
-Original Message-
From: Joern T. Larsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Leonard Stiles wrote:
>
> > Frank Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>I realized some problemes with "auto" and vfat, namely long
> >>filenames. When I tried the auto/detection it always showed 8.3
> >>filnames.
> >>
> > What is the output
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 18:32, Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> Leonard Stiles wrote:
> > Note that you can alternatively specify "auto" as the file-system
> > type, in which case it will be auto-detected by mount.
>
> I realized some problemes with "auto" and vfat, namely long
> filenames. When I tried t
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:36:02AM -0400, D-Man wrote:
> | filnames. Well, most times I use vfat foramttd ZIPs and the few
> | times I use something else I use
> | mount -t hfs /dev/hdd /zip
> | (why don't I need a partition number in this case?)
>
> I guess because the entire disk is 'hfs' (the
Leonard Stiles wrote:
Frank Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I realized some problemes with "auto" and vfat, namely long
filenames. When I tried the auto/detection it always showed 8.3
filnames.
What is the output of "mount" when this happens? Have you got vfat
support compiled into
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 11:32:08AM +0100, Frank Zimmermann wrote:
| Leonard Stiles wrote:
| > Note that you can alternatively specify "auto" as the file-system
| > type, in which case it will be auto-detected by mount.
|
| I realized some problemes with "auto" and vfat, namely long
| filenames. W
Frank Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I realized some problemes with "auto" and vfat, namely long
> filenames. When I tried the auto/detection it always showed 8.3
> filnames.
What is the output of "mount" when this happens? Have you got vfat
support compiled into your kernel, or is it
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 11:32:08AM +0100, Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> filnames. Well, most times I use vfat foramttd ZIPs and the few
> times I use something else I use
> mount -t hfs /dev/hdd /zip
> (why don't I need a partition number in this case?)
You don't. I did "mke2fs /dev/sda; mount -t ex
Leonard Stiles wrote:
Note that you can alternatively specify "auto" as the file-system
type, in which case it will be auto-detected by mount.
I realized some problemes with "auto" and vfat, namely long
filenames. When I tried the auto/detection it always showed 8.3
filnames. Well, most
D-Man wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:24:06PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> | /usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/mini/ZIP-Drive.txt.gz advised people
> | to do this in /etc/fstab:
> |
> | /dev/sda1 /zip ext2 noauto,rw,user,nosuid,sync
> | /dev/sda4 /zipdos vfat noauto,rw,user,n
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeld The Dark Elf wrote:
>
> > There is a wierd problem with ZIP disks. The ones formatted for
> > windows have their main partition at /dev/hdd4 while the ones
> > formatted with ext2 are /dev/hdd1. Don't know why.
>
> I've never seen any formatte
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:24:06PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
| Jeld The Dark Elf wrote:
|
| > There is a wierd problem with ZIP disks. The ones formatted for
| > windows have their main partition at /dev/hdd4 while the ones
| > formatted with ext2 are /dev/hdd1. Don't know why.
|
| I've nev
Jeld The Dark Elf wrote:
> There is a wierd problem with ZIP disks. The ones formatted for
> windows have their main partition at /dev/hdd4 while the ones
> formatted with ext2 are /dev/hdd1. Don't know why.
I've never seen any formatted with ext2 unless I had done it
myself, in which case I did
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:03:13AM -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote:
>
> duh. Thanks, it worked. First blush I thought the problem was the first
> warning, not the second...
>
> Jeff
There is a wierd problem with ZIP disks. The ones formatted for windows have
their main partition at
/dev/hdd4 while
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:03:13AM -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote:
| On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Petr [Dingo] Dvorak wrote:
| > On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jeff Maxson wrote:
| >
| > JM> mount -t vfat /dev/hdd1 /zip
| > JM>
| > JM> gets me
| > JM>
| > JM> hdd: The drive reports both 100663296 and 100646912 bytes as it
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Petr [Dingo] Dvorak wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jeff Maxson wrote:
>
> JM> mount -t vfat /dev/hdd1 /zip
> JM>
> JM> gets me
> JM>
> JM> hdd: The drive reports both 100663296 and 100646912 bytes as its capacity
> JM> hdd: hdd4
> JM> mount: mount point /zip does not exist
>
>
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jeff Maxson wrote:
JM> mount -t vfat /dev/hdd1 /zip
JM>
JM> gets me
JM>
JM> hdd: The drive reports both 100663296 and 100646912 bytes as its capacity
JM> hdd: hdd4
JM> mount: mount point /zip does not exist
first do mkdir /zip because it doesn't exist :)
then try mount -t
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Ari Pollak wrote:
> An IDE zip drive acts more like a hard drive than a floppy drive; It
> follows the same drive scheme as IDE cdroms or hard drives - e.g.
> Primary master drive is /dev/hda, secondary master is /dev/hdc..
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 11:21:12PM -0400, Jeff M
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jeff Maxson wrote:
JM> quick one: does a zip disk count as a hard drive, or a floppy? I am still
JM> pretty new at this, and would like to know how to mount it (it's an
JM> internal IDE).
i have scsi 100mb zip drive, the device i use to access it is /dev/sda .. so it
appears
An IDE zip drive acts more like a hard drive than a floppy drive; It
follows the same drive scheme as IDE cdroms or hard drives - e.g.
Primary master drive is /dev/hda, secondary master is /dev/hdc..
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 11:21:12PM -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote:
>
> quick one: does a zip disk count
Have you loaded the ppa module?
-Rob
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 10:34:00AM -0700, Clayton Stapleton wrote:
> Hi Folks;
> The Zip Drive uses a separate parallel port card to which it is
> plugged into (works under Windows 98). I have added the
> io=0x278 to "modules.conf", and run "depmod -a" to upda
You could check the messages in syslog, or use dmesg to see what
happens...
Ron Rademaker
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Goeman Stefan wrote:
> Hello everbody,
>
>
> I have another question.
>
> I also have an iomega ZIP drive (250 Mb) connected on the parallel port of
> my PC but I am not able to acce
"Arun V. Hodigere" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I was wondering if i could get a zip drive for linux. could
> anybody throw some light on this as to where i could get this ...
>
Well, if you are using an internal model it will be easily mounted as
/dev/hdX4, and nothing more.
If you are using a paralel
On 17 May 1999, Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have some problems in configuring my zip drive and my printer. I have
> compiled the
> kernel
> 2.2.9 with Zip Drive support. But, after some tries, I lost the contact with
> my printer. I
> have a
> script that mounts the Zip Drive
> Any other suggestions?
OK, I compiled my own 2.2.7 kernel and went through the docu: It
seems, that the module parport_pc was missing and therefore causing
all the trouble...
Thanks for you help!
Stef
> The only think I can think of is there's another program, more
> specifically a TSR that's running resident in the background causing
> modprobe to report with this error. Are you sure that you don't
> have lpd running in the background and that you have unloaded any
> other possibly conflicting
The only think I can think of is there's another program, more specifically a
TSR
that's running resident in the background causing modprobe to report with this
error.
Are you sure that you don't have lpd running in the background and that you have
unloaded any other possibly conflicting modules
> Just modprobe ppa and e-mail the output to this list. There should
> be an interrupt here for your parallel port, and yes, the parallel
> port can have conflicting irqs with other devices. Do that and let
> me see the output.
#> modprobe ppa
/lib/modules/2.2.5/scsi/ppa.o: init_module: Device o
Just modprobe ppa and e-mail the output to this list. There should be an
interrupt here for your parallel port, and yes, the parallel port can have
conflicting irqs with other devices. Do that and let me see the output.
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 09:55:51AM +0200, Debian Mail wrote:
> > Try modpro
> Try modprobe ppa.. Chances are you have conflicting IRQs. Look at your
> /proc/interrupts and make sure everything is "correct". Make sure you don't
> have ldp running and that you also have removed your lp module. Good luck.
Hm, there shouldn't be any conflicting IRQs, since the ZIP is a
p
> Did you compile support for the parallel port and for the correct type of
> Zip drive -- ppa or imm?
No, since I use kernel 2.2.5 comming from potato. There is however a
ppa module comming with that kernel, but I can_t just say insmod ppa,
because then I get a device or ressource bussy error.
S
> > I'm using kernel 2.2.7 on slink. My Zip (parallel) drive works perfectly
> > and so does the printer. I don't use modules at all. The 2.2.* kernel
> > series allows you to have multiple parallel support.
>
> But how do you use it? When I try do mount /dev/sda4 I just get
> mount: the kernel
Did you compile support for the parallel port and for the correct type of
Zip drive -- ppa or imm?
On Sat, 8 May 1999, Debian Mail wrote:
> > I'm using kernel 2.2.7 on slink. My Zip (parallel) drive works perfectly
> > and so does the printer. I don't use modules at all. The 2.2.* kernel
> > s
> I'm using kernel 2.2.7 on slink. My Zip (parallel) drive works perfectly
> and so does the printer. I don't use modules at all. The 2.2.* kernel
> series allows you to have multiple parallel support.
But how do you use it? When I try do mount /dev/sda4 I just get
mount: the kernel does not rec
On 07 May 1999, Debian Mail wrote:
> Once (Debien 1.3.1) I could use my ZIP drive by saying
>
> rmmod lp
> insmod scsi_mod
> insmod sd_mod
> insmod ppa
>
> After I installed Debian 2.0, ppa.o was not there any more. Now I
> installed kernel 2.2.5. So ppa.o is there again, but not the other two
>
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 11:46:07PM +1100, Attila Csobonyei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed Debian 2.0 slink and tried to remake the kernel
> with the Zip drive. Not being an expert in these things I first did a
> make zdisk which worked fine, the Zip drive was working without any
> problem
>> "AC" == Attila Csobonyei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AC> I have just installed Debian 2.0 slink and tried to remake the
AC> kernel with the Zip drive. Not being an expert in these things I
AC> first did a make zdisk which worked fine, the Zip drive was
AC> working without any problems. Next I
how do I use a zip drive with debian? Thanks
Read the ZIP-Drive mini-HOWTO. It's in the unmaintained section, but
still should be quite useful.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 12, 1998 at 01:35:10PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I'm running Linux 2.1.x and haven't been able to get my zip drive
> to work in ages (parallel port one). It should be as simple as installing
> parport, parport_pc, then ppa, shouldn't it? parport_pc always tells
> me device/resource
On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Thomas Rankin wrote:
> I really want to add my Zip drive to my Linux Box
> I have my Zip connected to an internal SCSI adapter that came with it.
> Under Windows NT, my adapter is listed as
> Adaptec AHA-151X/AGA-152X or AIC-6260/AIC-636
>
> Any help is appreciated
Yo
Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> works wonderfully on my linux side. I added the line:
> /dev/sda4 /zip msdos defaults0 0
> to my /etc/fstab file and the line:
> /dev/sda4 /zip msdos rw 0 0
> to my /etc/mtab file.
There is no use in altering the /etc/mtab
On 12-Feb-98 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I'm running Linux 2.1.x and haven't been able to get my zip drive
> to work in ages (parallel port one). It should be as simple as installing
> parport, parport_pc, then ppa, shouldn't it? parport_pc always tells
> me device/resource busy on insertion; inserting
On Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 07:27:51PM -0800, James C. Carr wrote:
> Well, I can't say if this is the same problem that I had
> experienced, but I've received a few errors saying that the Device or
> Resource is busy. The solution that I found was adding "lp=0x378" to
> lilo, so that it'd only s
On Thu, Feb 12, 1998 at 01:24:53AM -0800, Charles wrote:
> I have had some problems with ppp, but fortunately my zip drive
> works wonderfully on my linux side. I added the line:
> /dev/sda4 /zip msdos defaults0 0
> to my /etc/fstab file and the line:
> /dev/
Hamish,
I have had some problems with ppp, but fortunately my zip drive
works wonderfully on my linux side. I added the line:
/dev/sda4 /zip msdos defaults0 0
to my /etc/fstab file and the line:
/dev/sda4 /zip msdos rw 0 0
to my /etc/mtab file.
I will attach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Evening,
Well, I can't say if this is the same problem that I had
experienced, but I've received a few errors saying that the Device or
Resource is busy. The solution that I found was adding "lp=0x378" to
lilo, so that it'd only set up the fi
In article , you wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Michael Harnois wrote:
> > Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Could someone help me with the installation of parallel version of
> > > iomega ZIP under Debian Linux? I do not know where to start...
> All you have to do is to compile the mod
On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Milos Prudek wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Could someone help me with the installation of parallel version of
> iomega ZIP under Debian Linux? I do not know where to start...
>
> Thanks a lot!
Debian kernels .30 and .29 are alread compiled for zip support, as long as
the zip drive is
> "Magossa'nyi" == Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Magossa'nyi> On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Michael Harnois wrote:
>> Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Could someone help me with the installation of parallel
>> version of > iomega ZIP under Debian Li
Actually, the best chance for a substantive answer to the question
would be to join linux-parport and ask there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] There is also a parport home
page at http://www.torque.net/linux-pp.html.
--
Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
There is a zip howto. It may require recompiling the kernel to support
these special parallel port devices (sorry, forgot the exact option).
HTH,
Brandon
-
Brandon Mitchell E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/7877/home.html
On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Michael Harnois wrote:
> Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Could someone help me with the installation of parallel version of
> > iomega ZIP under Debian Linux? I do not know where to start...
>
> Can you do it from a stock Debian kernel? I'm not sure. I'm doing
Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could someone help me with the installation of parallel version of
> iomega ZIP under Debian Linux? I do not know where to start...
Can you do it from a stock Debian kernel? I'm not sure. I'm doing it
under 2.1.51 and it's easy from there ...
--
Micha
Aslak wrote...
> > > > I have one of the IOMEGA ZIP-drives,100MB, parralell version,
> > > > and was wondering if it is, if it can, and if it will be
> > > > possible to have one's linux system one of these ZIP disks. It
> > > > _is_ possible to have a system on 100Megs, and it would be
> > > > ex
I am using a parallel port version and I can vouch that it does work. The
driver is available from http://www.torgue.net/zip.html. I have also read
reports that the scsi driver works fine but I have experience with it.
--
83 matches
Mail list logo
