Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

That's not quite so. Someone said it's obvious that the list uses spamassassin, whereas in fact that's not so. I don't see headers inserted by Debian. Well if your right John, who do you think put these headers on your message? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-lists.debian.org_200

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

John Summerfield([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > David P James wrote: > > >On Thu 5 August 2004 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: > > > > > >>Matt Perry wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > >>> > >>> > Why would anyone want to? >

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

David P James wrote: On Thu 5 August 2004 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: Matt Perry wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: Why would anyone want to? Why would anyone want to what? Retain old sa headers? The only ones valid for sorting are those injected by

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

On Thu 5 August 2004 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: > Matt Perry wrote: > >On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > >>Why would anyone want to? > > > >Why would anyone want to what? > > Retain old sa headers? The only ones valid for sorting are those > injected by your own SA. Good grief - yo

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Matt Perry wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: Why would anyone want to? Why would anyone want to what? Retain old sa headers? The only ones valid for sorting are those injected by your own SA. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Chris Metzler wrote: > On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:28:53 +1000 > Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Is this list not spamassassined? > > > Of course it is. The listmasters have posted here before, telling > us that something like 95% of all email incoming to their lists is > being rejected as

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Matt Perry wrote: On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: Edvard Majakari wrote: Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. The only s-a headers I see are mine. SA overwrites other SA headers. You can use the following in procmail to keep them: :0fhw: * ^X-Spam-Sta

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > Edvard Majakari wrote: > > >Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. > > > > > The only s-a headers I see are mine. SA overwrites other SA headers. You can use the following in procmail to keep them: :0fhw: * ^X-Spam-Status: | formail -

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paul Gear wrote: > >>Is this list not spamassassined? > > Debian is quite friendly towards spammers. Where did you get that idea? According to the list rules, spammers succeeding in getting a message to the list are billed $bignum per message per li

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:28:53 +1000 Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this list not spamassassined? Of course it is. The listmasters have posted here before, telling us that something like 95% of all email incoming to their lists is being rejected as spam. You see 5-10 spam emails a day

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

John Summerfield said: > Edvard Majakari wrote: > >>Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. >> >> > The only s-a headers I see are mine. > > > -- > > Cheers > John > I don't run SpamAssasin here, and I have [..] X-Rc-Virus: 2004-07-20_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2004-07-19_01 X-Spam-Checker-Version:

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Edvard Majakari wrote: Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. The only s-a headers I see are mine. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. However, I don't know if the Bayesian filter is trained. With training, you'd expect better accuracy. -- # Edvard Majakari Software Engineer # PGP PUBLIC KEY available Soli Deo Gloria! $_ = '456476617264204d616a616b6172692c20

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Paul Gear wrote: Is this list not spamassassined? Debian is quite friendly towards spammers. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Is this list not spamassassined? -- Paul -- Did you know? If you use two dashes followed by a space as your signature separator, good email programs will chop them off automatically, reducing noise in email replies. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatu