On Dec 05 2000, Sam TH wrote:
[About tcp-server]
> Sadly, that means it is non-free since djb doesn't believe in free
> software.
> :-(
Yes, this is indeed the case. If you can't have free software
in your computers, then that is indeed a pity.
But if you can, then you m
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:33:21AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> try tcpserver is suppose to be very secure replacement for inetd, it
> was written by the same guy who wrote qmail - secure replacement for
> sendmail.
>
Sadly, that means it is non-free since djb doesn't believe in free
softwar
try tcpserver is suppose to be very secure replacement for inetd, it
was written by the same guy who wrote qmail - secure replacement for
sendmail.
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 09:05:17PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> "S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
>
> > Finally, the sole reply to my posting. Thanks for the i
"S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
> Finally, the sole reply to my posting. Thanks for the info. One of these
> days when I reinstall Debian on my FW system, I will use xinetd instead
> of inetd.
curious what do you need (x)inetd for on a firewall? perhaps the only
daemon running on such a system is ssh..wh
-> Is it better to user xinetd vs. regular inetd on a firewall box ?
it's better to use xinetd then inetd at all.
-> Also, why isn't xinetd used in debian by default ?
1. its harder to configure (but more powerful)
2. update-inetd doesn't recognize its format (afaik)
--
Matus "fantomas" Uhlar
5 matches
Mail list logo
