Re: xfstt and xfs-xtt

2000-01-31 Thread Shao Zhang
Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Shao Zhang wrote: > > : Hi, > :Can someone please explain the difference between the two?? > > xfstt is a hack; it runs on a different port than xfs. > > xfs-xtt is intended to replace xfs and serve up TrueType fonts as well >

Re: xfstt and xfs-xtt

2000-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Shao Zhang wrote: : Hi, : Can someone please explain the difference between the two?? xfstt is a hack; it runs on a different port than xfs. xfs-xtt is intended to replace xfs and serve up TrueType fonts as well as the standard X fonts. xfstt is pretty easy to set up

Re: xfstt and xfs-xtt

2000-01-27 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Some what recently, Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about xfstt and xfs-xtt >:) Hi, >:) Can someone please explain the difference between the two?? >:) Thanks. >:) >:) Shao. >:) I have to use xfs-xtt inorfor to use tis620 encoding Chanop -- ,--

Re: xfstt and xfs-xtt

2000-01-27 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
Hi Shao! On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Shao Zhang wrote: > Can someone please explain the difference between the two?? > Thanks. xfs-xtt is better for dealing with CJK fonts, and can also do some transformations (such as bold, slant...) For western fonts, xfstt is probably enough. I personall