On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 01:31:49PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Eric G . Miller wrote:
> > Personally, xfs doesn't make any sense unless you're sharing fonts to
> > other machines.
>
> Not really true. If you've ever been say, using the Gimp, and decided to
> enter some text in a very large font, and
Eric G . Miller wrote:
> Personally, xfs doesn't make any sense unless you're sharing fonts to
> other machines.
Not really true. If you've ever been say, using the Gimp, and decided to
enter some text in a very large font, and then been annoyed when X locked up
for a minute to render that font, y
"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 06:45:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:59:24PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > > Not exactly Debian-specific
> > >
> > > Can anyone point me to some layman's=style docs concerning
> > > xfs vs xfstt vs using na
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 06:45:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:59:24PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > Not exactly Debian-specific
> >
> > Can anyone point me to some layman's=style docs concerning
> > xfs vs xfstt vs using native Linux fonts? I've read the
> > DeU
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:59:24PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Not exactly Debian-specific
>
> Can anyone point me to some layman's=style docs concerning
> xfs vs xfstt vs using native Linux fonts? I've read the
> DeUglification mini-Howto, but it didn't make clear whether
> you'd want to use xf
5 matches
Mail list logo
