[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The maintainers of these two packages reached an agreement on
> how to make possible to install both without any conflicts.
> They uploaded corrected versions to master.debian.org/Incoming
> but for some reason they were not transferred to Bo. I downloaded
> these two p
The maintainers of these two packages reached an agreement on
how to make possible to install both without any conflicts.
They uploaded corrected versions to master.debian.org/Incoming
but for some reason they were not transferred to Bo. I downloaded
these two packages from Incoming and installed
Steve Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the
> same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?)
I have both on my computer at home. All that I know is that there are some
conflict in some few auxiliary binari
> "Jean" == Jean Pierre LeJacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean> I have both working fine on my system which is based on the
Jean> unstable branch. Didn't have to do anything special.
Jean> On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote:
>> Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packag
I have both working fine on my system which is based on the
unstable branch. Didn't have to do anything special.
--
Jean Pierre
On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote:
> Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the
> same Debian system? (What would it take to make
Steve Hsieh writes:
>
> Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the
> same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?)
I was thinking of this lately. I also was wondering whey they
don't use update-alternatives - like the three vi clones do.
Both pr
6 matches
Mail list logo
