Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 10:29:32PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Actually, I'm basically running a glibc2 version of potato. :) (I > > compiled many of the potato stuff using the glibc2 in slink on a slink > > system). I'm still a little squeamish about glibc2.1 and I'm running > > pot

Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread surak
> > Actually, I'm basically running a glibc2 version of potato. :) (I > compiled many of the potato stuff using the glibc2 in slink on a slink > system). I'm still a little squeamish about glibc2.1 and I'm running > potato at work where ddd has just stopped working since upgrading from > slink.

Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm guessing you are running potato, so if not this may not apply: Actually, I'm basically running a glibc2 version of potato. :) (I compiled many of the potato stuff using the glibc2 in slink on a slink system). I'm still a little squeamish about

Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread surak
I'm guessing you are running potato, so if not this may not apply: I've compiled every prerelease version of x11amp, up to and including beta1.1, without problems. You have the gtk and glib stuff, but do you have the gdk stuff too? For me, x11amp needs these libraries: tomorrow:~> ldd /usr/local/