Re: X.org intel error on jessie

Andrei POPESCU writes: > On Du, 23 feb 14, 09:08:27, Felix Natter wrote: >> hello, hi Andrei, >> I updated my jessie yesterday and today KDE starts up with flickering, >> not displaying widgets and disables effects on second login. I am >> worried that more things will break (like damage to the

Re: X.org intel error on jessie

On Du, 23 feb 14, 09:08:27, Felix Natter wrote: > hello, > > I updated my jessie yesterday and today KDE starts up with flickering, > not displaying widgets and disables effects on second login. I am > worried that more things will break (like damage to the hardware). > > This could be due to xor

Re: X.Org X Server 1.12.4 segfault in jessie: howto report?

Sven Joachim wrote: On 2013-05-29 19:01 +0200, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: In Jessie running the Nvidia driver and Virtualbox 4.2.12 I occasionally get an X segfault, like this: http://pastebin.com/Jp6KQytw Is this reportable as a bug? Not in Debian, unless you can also reproduce it with Nouveau

Re: X.Org X Server 1.12.4 segfault in jessie: howto report?

On 2013-05-29 19:01 +0200, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > In Jessie running the Nvidia driver and Virtualbox 4.2.12 I > occasionally get an X segfault, like this: > > http://pastebin.com/Jp6KQytw > > Is this reportable as a bug? Not in Debian, unless you can also reproduce it with Nouveau. For Nvidia s

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

> > > I can open the keyboard configuration dialog directly by running: > > > > > > kcmshell4 keyboard > > > > > > What happens when you try this? > > > > Nothing happens. The keyboard configuration module is > > provided by /usr/lib/kde4/kcm_keyboard.so, from package > > kdebase-workspace-b

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 00:16:44 +0200, Davide Mancusi wrote: [...] > > I can open the keyboard configuration dialog directly by running: > > > > kcmshell4 keyboard > > > > What happens when you try this? > > Nothing happens. The keyboard configuration module is provided > by /usr/lib/kd

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

Florian, Thanks for your time. > > > Strace suggests that the mouse and keyboard settings are saved in > > > ~/.kde/share/config/kcminputrc on my system. Do you have anything > > > in this file? My keyboard section in there looks like this: > > > > > [snip] > > > > The file exists,

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 00:40:32 +0200, Davide Mancusi wrote: > Earlier, Florian Kulzer wrote: [...] > > Strace suggests that the mouse and keyboard settings are saved in > > ~/.kde/share/config/kcminputrc on my system. Do you have anything in > > this file? My keyboard section in there looks lik

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

> Did you already try to start KDE for a "fresh" user? Yes, to no avail. > Strace suggests that the mouse and keyboard settings are saved in > ~/.kde/share/config/kcminputrc on my system. Do you have anything in > this file? My keyboard section in there looks like this: > [snip]

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 22:37:43 +0200, Davide Mancusi wrote: > > > > Right. As far as I can tell it's set in the WM/DE (for Xfce: Menu > > > > -> Settings -> Keyboard: Behaviour tab). > > > > > > ...but KDE4.2 doesn't have it. Grrr. > > > > Kickoff Menu > Computer > System Settings > Keyboard

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

> > > Right. As far as I can tell it's set in the WM/DE (for Xfce: Menu > > > -> Settings -> Keyboard: Behaviour tab). > > > > ...but KDE4.2 doesn't have it. Grrr. > > Kickoff Menu > Computer > System Settings > Keyboard & Mouse > > Keyboard > > should have an "Enable keyboard repeat" checkb

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 20:05:20 +0200, Davide Mancusi wrote: > > > But the keyboard repeat rate is not set by Xkb, as far > > > as I'm aware. > > > > Right. As far as I can tell it's set in the WM/DE (for Xfce: Menu -> > > Settings -> Keyboard: Behaviour tab). > > ...but KDE4.2 doesn't

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

> > But the keyboard repeat rate is not set by Xkb, as far > > as I'm aware. > > Right. As far as I can tell it's set in the WM/DE (for Xfce: Menu -> > Settings -> Keyboard: Behaviour tab). ...but KDE4.2 doesn't have it. Grrr. Davide -- Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Sun,26.Apr.09, 21:53:33, Davide Mancusi wrote: > But the keyboard repeat rate is not set by Xkb, as far > as I'm aware. Right. As far as I can tell it's set in the WM/DE (for Xfce: Menu -> Settings -> Keyboard: Behaviour tab). Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you do

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

> > I have upgraded X to v1:7.4+1 and now I'm struggling with > > hal to reproduce the same configuration I had before. I managed to > > set up the keyboard layouts and the xkb options, but I can't find > > how to change the keyboard repeat rate. For the moment, I have > > created a policy file

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Thu,23.Apr.09, 19:43:37, Davide Mancusi wrote: > Hi .*, > > I have upgraded X to v1:7.4+1 and now I'm struggling with hal > to reproduce the same configuration I had before. I managed to set up > the keyboard layouts and the xkb options, but I can't find how to change > the keyboard repea

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

> >        I have upgraded X to v1:7.4+1 and now I'm struggling with hal > > to reproduce the same configuration I had before. I managed to set > > up the keyboard layouts and the xkb options, but I can't find how > > to change the keyboard repeat rate. For the moment, I have created > > a policy f

Re: X.org Keyboard repeat rate through hal

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:43, Davide Mancusi wrote: > Hi .*, > >        I have upgraded X to v1:7.4+1 and now I'm struggling with hal > to reproduce the same configuration I had before. I managed to set up > the keyboard layouts and the xkb options, but I can't find how to change > the keyboard r

Re: X.org driver

[ Please try to turn off the HTML. ] On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:45:00 +0430, Nima Azarbayjany wrote: > Hi all, > > How can I tell which driver is being used by x.org at run-time? You can find this information in the xorg log file, for example with this command: grep /drivers/ /var/log/Xorg.0.l

Suppressing console messages [was Re: x.org]

PLEASE REPLY TO THE LIST AND NOT TO ME PERSONALLY! I am no expert, and you will get much more authoritative help from the list at large! This means that you should use "Reply-All" or whatever gmail uses. Then you should tweak the addresses appropriately. On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:54:51AM -0700, [

Re: x.org

Please be sure to reply to the list and not to me personally. You will miss out on the wisdom of many more knowledgeable people than me... On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:57:54PM -0600, Cliff McAtee wrote: > Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 05:07:50PM -0600, Cliff McAtee wrote: >

Re: x.org

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 05:07:50PM -0600, Cliff McAtee wrote: > Hi my name is Cliff McAtee > I am new to Debian. I installed from a disc. Went through the install. > every thing looked ok until trying to open. > starting from GRUB I was informed x.org did not install correctly. All I > get is a

Re: X.org: manual fonts installation

Am 2007-03-03 13:34:08, schrieb Sjoerd Hiemstra: > Could you give a similar way to install Type1 fonts, consisting of > a .pfa or .pfb file, and a .afm file? AFAIK it is the same procedure since it has the same fonts.dir fonts.scale files in the directory but additonaly the encoding

Re: X.org: manual fonts installation

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:30:35 +0100 Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) mkdir ~/.font > 2) cp *.ttf ~/.font/ > 3) cd ~/.font > 4) mkfontscale ./ > 5) mkfontdir ./ > > and under X: > > 6) xset +fp ~/.font > > which can be put into your ~/.xesssion or similar files >

Re: X.org: manual fonts installation

1) mkdir ~/.font 2) cp *.ttf ~/.font/ 3) cd ~/.font 4) mkfontscale ./ 5) mkfontdir ./ and under X: 6) xset +fp ~/.font which can be put into your ~/.xesssion or similar files which are read at startup of the xserver No restart of the xserver is required since 'xset +/-fp' is w

Re: X.org mouse broke on dist-upgrade, solved ?

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 02:47:56PM -0800, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: > [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] > A colleague did a dist-upgrade, sarge to etch, and everything > still worked except the X Window System. dpkg-reconfigure > left him with "No screens found" X unusable.

Re: x.org and unplugged hotplug devices

On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 04:49 -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote: >Is there some way to tell X, "hey, don't worry if you don't have a mouse > right now, just keep an eye on /dev/input/mice and if it decides to show up > you can use it"? Hi, From the xorg.conf man page: Option "AllowMouseOpenFail" "

Re: X.org killed my ATI TV

Kent West wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: >> Kent West wrote: >> >> >>> I kept hoping that a new upgrade of the box would bring in the necessary >>> stuff to get it working again, as the GATOS site indicated (as well as I >>> could make out - the site's not organized in a way that I can make muc

Re: X.org killed my ATI TV

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kent West wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: >> Kent West wrote: >> >> >>> I kept hoping that a new upgrade of the box would bring in the necessary >>> stuff to get it working again, as the GATOS site indicated (as well as I I also am experiencing probl

Re: X.org killed my ATI TV

Bernd Schubert wrote: Kent West wrote: I kept hoping that a new upgrade of the box would bring in the necessary stuff to get it working again, as the GATOS site indicated (as well as I could make out - the site's not organized in a way that I can make much sense of it) that all the ati.2 dri

Re: X.org killed my ATI TV

Kent West wrote: > > I kept hoping that a new upgrade of the box would bring in the necessary > stuff to get it working again, as the GATOS site indicated (as well as I > could make out - the site's not organized in a way that I can make much > sense of it) that all the ati.2 driver stuff had bee

Re: X.org fü r OpenGL konfigurieren

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Matthias Pfeifer wrote: > Thanks for the friendly hints. How should i proceed with my message in > this group? Delete it? Don't worry about it--it's already been mailed out to list members. -- Christopher Nelson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: X.org für OpenGL konfigurieren

Thanks for the friendly hints. How should i proceed with my message in this group? Delete it? m -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: X.org für OpenGL konfigurieren

这是你说的什么语言? On 7/20/06, Christopher Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:05:54PM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:> Matthias Pfeifer wrote:> >Hallo gruppe,>> [snip]>> Hallo!>> Dies ist leider eine ,,nur Englisch'' Liste. Bitte suchen Sie > anderswohin diese Frage zu stellen! Moeglic

Re: X.org fü r OpenGL konfigurieren

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:05:54PM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > Matthias Pfeifer wrote: > >Hallo gruppe, > > [snip] > > Hallo! > > Dies ist leider eine ,,nur Englisch'' Liste. Bitte suchen Sie > anderswohin diese Frage zu stellen! Moeglicherweise gibt es > hier jemand, der Sie eine andere Adress

Re: X.org für OpenGL konfigurieren

Matthias Pfeifer wrote: Hallo gruppe, [snip] Hallo! Dies ist leider eine ,,nur Englisch'' Liste. Bitte suchen Sie anderswohin diese Frage zu stellen! Moeglicherweise gibt es hier jemand, der Sie eine andere Adresse geben kann. Leider kann ich nicht. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,3

Re: X.org / deal head problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: System: Dell Optiplex GX270 with an additional old ATI Rage PCI video card. X-Window System Version 6.9.0 (21 dec 05) Relevant(?) xorg.conf sections pasted at end.. > I hadn't run a "dist-upgrade" for some time, but one afternoon, with > some spare time, decided to do

Re: X.org / deal head problem

My only advice would be to post a bug on Debian's tracker and/or FDO's tracker. Sorry; good luck. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: X.org resolution default selection

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 22:04:21 -0800 Joel Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any other suggestions as to how I can accomplish this? Again, I'd like > 1400x1050 for normal desktop use, but be able to switch (via XRANDR) to lower > *and higher* resolutions. The only other thought I have it to place

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg synaptics touchpad problem?

Adam Porter wrote: Was the kernel upgraded? Check dmesg. Is the kernel module getting loaded? Is it saying anything on boot? All we know right now is that X can't find it. synaptics touchpad works fine on my acer travelmate with 2.6.12 kernel and xorg @ testing (i'm using the synaptics modul

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg synaptics touchpad problem?

Was the kernel upgraded? Check dmesg. Is the kernel module getting loaded? Is it saying anything on boot? All we know right now is that X can't find it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg synaptics touchpad problem?

BTW, I forgot to mention that I am using kernel 2.6.12.10... Cheers -- Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg synaptics touchpad problem?

Hi there, after doing a "smart upgrade" using Synaptic (yes, I am talking about the package manager GUI here... ;-), I can't get *any* mouse-like device to work on my ThinkPad T42... I am using Debian unstable with X.org, and neither the "nipple" nor the synaptics touchpad are responding any more.

Re: X.org does not start properly after upgrade

On 10/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > I looked into my system with Knoppix and found the /etc/X11/xorg.conf is > basically an identical copy of the corresponding Xf84 config-4 file. So I do > not understand where to look to get X.org running or at least to get xf86 > ba

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I did the upgrade, had to select xserver-xorg manually, ran > dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg, answered the questions based on what was > in my XF86Config file, ran startx and it all worked! The fonts looked > horrid so I copied the debconf lines into xor

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:39:58 -0300 Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using X.org with a Matrox G400 card (monohead, AGP, 16MB of RAM, > resolution of 1400x1050) and I have no problems like corrupted display. Close enough, more or less, since I don't have two monitors, hence I don't u

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

Cum, 2005-09-09 tarihinde 17:35 -0400 saatinde, Stephen R Laniel yazdı: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:31:42PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Subject says it all: one machine works and I can still access virtual > > terminals with Ctrl-Alt-F*, one doesn't and is effectively X only. > > > > Anot

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

Aurélien Campéas a écrit : Aurélien Campéas a écrit : David E. Fox a écrit : On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:12:17 +0200 Aurélien Campéas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Same here : for an old MGA (Matrox Video Card), I have a corrupted display (completely unusable). I tested xorg yesterday and

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

Aurélien Campéas a écrit : David E. Fox a écrit : On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:12:17 +0200 Aurélien Campéas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Same here : for an old MGA (Matrox Video Card), I have a corrupted display (completely unusable). I tested xorg yesterday and had to By any chance is y

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

David E. Fox a écrit : On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:12:17 +0200 Aurélien Campéas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ben Pearre a écrit : I'm very sorry for the possibly off-topic reply. I have had one problem since my Unstable system went to Xorg, and I don't know whether this is the place to air it. Pl

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ?? [SOLVED]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:26:26PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > >Subject says it all: one machine works and I can still access virtual > >terminals with Ctrl-Alt-F*, one doesn't and is effectively X only. > > > >Another colleague has reported the same problem in

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

On Sep 09 2005, David E. Fox wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:12:17 +0200 Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > Same here : for an old MGA (Matrox Video Card), I have a corrupted > > display (completely unusable). I tested xorg yesterday and had to > > By any chance is your Matrox a Millenium G450? That's

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

On Sep 09 2005, Rick Pasotto wrote: > I noticed one thing: my onboard via video now has the xv extention and > xine now plays, even full screen, without complaining about missing > too many frames and using all the cpu. The same thing here, but with an ATI Mach64 card. It now has xv support and I

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

On 9/9/05, Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> I don't know if it's actual or the power of suggestion, but I've> noticed that the fonts with X.org look awfully nice.  I don't have a> screenshot to compare with XF86, but...  :)  And, anyway, it's the> future, so since it's wo

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:12:17 +0200 Aurélien Campéas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ben Pearre a écrit : > > I'm very sorry for the possibly off-topic reply. > > > > I have had one problem since my Unstable system went to Xorg, and I > > don't know whether this is the place to air it. Please forgiv

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:47:59PM -0400, Colin wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I don't know if it's actual or the power of suggestion, but I've > > noticed that the fonts with X.org look awfully nice. I don't have a > > screenshot to compare with XF86, but... :) And, anyway, it's the >

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know if it's actual or the power of suggestion, but I've > noticed that the fonts with X.org look awfully nice. I don't have a > screenshot to compare with XF86, but... :) And, anyway, it's the > future, so since it's working so well, why not go ahead and swit

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

On 2005-09-09 21:31:42 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Subject says it all: one machine works and I can still access virtual > terminals with Ctrl-Alt-F*, one doesn't and is effectively X only. It was broken even before X.org. I solved the problem by disabling XKb with: Section "ServerFlags"

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: Subject says it all: one machine works and I can still access virtual terminals with Ctrl-Alt-F*, one doesn't and is effectively X only. Another colleague has reported the same problem in testing: he's anxious not to mess up his laptop. Anyone else noticed anything sim

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: Subject says it all: one machine works and I can still access virtual terminals with Ctrl-Alt-F*, one doesn't and is effectively X only. Another colleague has reported the same problem in testing: he's anxious not to mess up his laptop. Anyone else noticed anything simi

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

Stephen R Laniel wrote: I've been using it under Ubuntu for months; I've had this problem you mention for a while now. I'm not sure what the latest status on it is; I'll ask on the Ubuntu list and see what they say. I'm using ubuntu too, but i don't have this problem... iirc my friend runnin

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

On 9/9/05, Andrew M.A. Cater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone else noticed anything similar?? > Not sure if this helps, but I had to recompile the Nvidia drivers after the Xorg upgrade. -- Jiann-Ming Su "I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted to do that, I'

Re: X.org transition breaks Ctrl-Alt-F* ??

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:31:42PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Subject says it all: one machine works and I can still access virtual > terminals with Ctrl-Alt-F*, one doesn't and is effectively X only. > > Another colleague has reported the same problem in testing: he's anxious > not to mess

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/8/05, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for posting that, Hugo. I'm sure it's just a matter of time until this problem is fixed by nVidia and/or X.org. nVidia wants to sell their cards, and people want eye candy, and people want Linux, so we

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

On 9/8/05, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't know if this is appropriate. Anyway: > > I have Nvidia videocards and use the closedsource driver (7167). > > X.org with its eyecandy, for a non-gamer, brought the necessity of using > driver options: > > Option "RenderAc

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

Jason Clinton wrote: Well its finally happened, and I'm so happy that it has. As of now, most of mirrors have X.Org packages in their testing/etch repository. Before I perform the upgrade, I'm starting this thread to catch any and all problems that might arrise. Please let us know if you have a

Re: X.org Translucency Lockup: Should I file a bug?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the recent move of X.org into testing, I installed it, upgraded KDE to 3.4 from unstable, and proceeded to try out the new stuff. Shadows work great, but as soon as I turn on translucency, the computer locks up hard. Well, I can move the mouse cursor, but that is

Re: X.org Translucency Lockup: Should I file a bug?

Hi, I've had the same problem for some time now.  It's been a long time since i've played w/ it, but iirc the nvidia (you are using binary like me i'm assuming?) documentation warns that the composite extension is not supported and experimental.  Same goes for the RenderAccel option in the xorg.co

Re: X.org Translucency Lockup: Should I file a bug?

On 9/8/05, David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've tried to get shadows working with xcompmgr and usually as soon as I > try to move a window or roll it up, the system locks hard as well. CPU > for X goes to 100%. > > I don't need to reboot, but I do have to shell in remotely and restart

Re: X.org Translucency Lockup: Should I file a bug?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:37:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With the recent move of X.org into testing, I installed it, upgraded > KDE to 3.4 from unstable, and proceeded to try out the new stuff. > Shadows work great, but as soon as I turn on translucency, the > computer locks up hard.

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg MGA driver problem?

Ben Pearre a écrit : I'm very sorry for the possibly off-topic reply. I have had one problem since my Unstable system went to Xorg, and I don't know whether this is the place to air it. Please forgive if not. If this is interesting, ask me for more info, as I've tried to keep this brief: [sn

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

* Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Sep 07 16:36 -0500]: > Well its finally happened, and I'm so happy that it has. As of now, most of > mirrors have X.Org packages in their testing/etch repository. Before I > perform the upgrade, I'm starting this thread to catch any and all problems > th

Re: X.Org Hits Testing: Xorg synaptics touchpad problem?

I'm very sorry for the possibly off-topic reply. I have had one problem since my Unstable system went to Xorg, and I don't know whether this is the place to air it. Please forgive if not. If this is interesting, ask me for more info, as I've tried to keep this brief: Synaptics touchpad driver i

Re: X.Org Hits Testing OT: debian-laptop.org back on track

On Sep 07 2005, Philip Schwartz wrote: > I am using etch and I checked 3 different mirrors. None of them have > xorg. Perhaps the mirror you checked wasn't up-to-date. > I don't think it has been moved out of sid yet. It has. I'm downloading it right now for PowerPC and, after seeing how things

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

On 9/7/05, Oliver Lupton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Clinton wrote: > > >Well its finally happened, and I'm so happy that it has. As of now, most of > >mirrors have X.Org packages in their testing/etch repository. Before I > >perform the upgrade, I'm starting this thread to catch any and al

Re: X.Org Hits Testing OT: debian-laptop.org back on track

> Jason Clinton wrote: > >>Well its finally happened, and I'm so happy that it has. As of now, most >> of >>mirrors have X.Org packages in their testing/etch repository. Before I >>perform the upgrade, I'm starting this thread to catch any and all >> problems >>that might arrise. Please let us know

Re: X.Org Hits Testing

Jason Clinton wrote: Well its finally happened, and I'm so happy that it has. As of now, most of mirrors have X.Org packages in their testing/etch repository. Before I perform the upgrade, I'm starting this thread to catch any and all problems that might arrise. Please let us know if you have

Re: X.org Troubles: XMMS Errors Out, GnuCash Rendering Slow

On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 08:59:58PM -0700, ewhac wrote: > Everything seemed to work fine, and life went on. However, some > time later, I noted that XMMS would no longer launch. The error message is: > > > bash$ xmms > Message: device: default > Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid paramete

Re: X.org Troubles: XMMS Errors Out, GnuCash Rendering Slow

Leo L. Schwab wrote: I tried upgrading my Debian unstable system to X.org, as described here: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/185 Everything seemed to work fine, and life went on. However, some time later, I noted that XMMS would no longer launch. The err

Re: X.org Troubles:  XMMS Errors Out

On Monday 01 August 2005 11:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I tried upgrading my Debian unstable system to X.org, as described > here: > > http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/185 > > Everything seemed to work fine, and life went on.  However, some > time later, I n

Re: X.org, DELL 2001FP LCD monitor and 1600x1200 resolution

I solved the problem. The following lines were needed too: DisplaySize 367 275 HorizSync 31-80 VertRefresh 56-76 (even though the server automatically detects these values). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessi

Re: X.org

John Hasler wrote: Michel Di Croci writes: How much devs are currently developping debian? Most of us don't know enough about X to be any use. Of those that do some have chosen to participate in the X team. No one assigns jobs to Debian developers. Volunteer organizations... you get what

Re: X.org 6.8.2

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:46:48PM +0200, gustavo halperin wrote: > Kevin Mark wrote: > > >> > >Hi Sven, > >I have for the past 2 month been using an unofficial Xorg from > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] at: > > > >deb http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/xorg/ ./ > >deb-src http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger

Re: X.org 6.8.2

Kevin Mark wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:25:51PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote: gustavo halperin wrote: I almost try it, but isn't the problem. There is also a problem with a "LD_LIBRARY_PATH", the aren't contain the "/usr/X11R6/lib" and nothing almost is work at the time that I ad

Re: X.org 6.8.2

On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:25:51PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > gustavo halperin wrote: > > I almost try it, but isn't the problem. > > There is also a problem with a "LD_LIBRARY_PATH", the aren't contain the > > "/usr/X11R6/lib" > > and nothing almost is work at the time that I add manually thi

Re: X.org 6.8.2

gustavo halperin wrote: > I almost try it, but isn't the problem. > There is also a problem with a "LD_LIBRARY_PATH", the aren't contain the > "/usr/X11R6/lib" > and nothing almost is work at the time that I add manually this path. > After it if I try manually for example the next command: > > se

Re: X.org 6.8.2

gustavo halperin wrote: > I was installed from the source the last X.org version, 6.8.2. > My computer is laptop Toshiba Portege R100 with Trident Graphic Card. > After to copy the XF86config-4 to a new file xorg.conf the system was up. > I have currently two problems: > 1:- From the x.org.log I ge

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 18:49 -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote: > Hanspeter Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi Johan, > > > > > I am using the radeon driver supplied with xfree86 4.3 in debian/sid. > > > I can set the display to 1400x1050 but there is a band about an inch > > > or so (roughly 100

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

Hanspeter Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Johan, > > > I am using the radeon driver supplied with xfree86 4.3 in debian/sid. > > I can set the display to 1400x1050 but there is a band about an inch > > or so (roughly 100-200 pixels in width) along the rightmost edge where > > the picture is

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 17:08 +, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime. > > I find it more interesting that because of the Xorg/XFree86 issue, more > and more people are saying that they *do* need Xo

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

At 13 Dec 2004 17:49:06 -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote: > > Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > At 12 Dec 2004 16:08:07 -0500, > > Johan Kullstam wrote: > > > > > > Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > --- Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > for it. L

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

Hi Johan, > I am using the radeon driver supplied with xfree86 4.3 in debian/sid. > I can set the display to 1400x1050 but there is a band about an inch > or so (roughly 100-200 pixels in width) along the rightmost edge where > the picture is distorted by odd shadings. On my Sony Z1, radeon card,

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree [SOLVED]

On Monday 13 December 2004 05:35 pm, Thomas Dickey wrote: > actually I only saw that spew as I was looking for bug reports. > > My regards to the slashdotters. I hate to ask, but: what spew? -- Kirk Strauser pgpi1u2QudRV0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

At Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:53:03 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > [1 ] > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (uppercase drivel deleted). > > Maybe you should spend more time reading such "drivel" and less time > spewing drivel, eh

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree [SOLVED]

Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't you both take this off-list and save us dusting off our killfiles? actually I only saw that spew as I was looking for bug reports. My regards to the slashdotters. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 12 Dec 2004 16:08:07 -0500, > Johan Kullstam wrote: > > > > Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > --- Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime. > > > > > > I find i

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

At 12 Dec 2004 16:08:07 -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote: > > Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > --- Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime. > > > > I find it more interesting that because of the Xorg/XFree86 issue, m

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree [SOLVED]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:21:00 -, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --=-yzVPeN7Rs2DZ/D3emZNd > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote: > >> Johan

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --=-yzVPeN7Rs2DZ/D3emZNd > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (uppercase drivel deleted). > Maybe you should s

Re: X.org <-----> Xfree

On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote: > Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (uppercase drivel deleted). Maybe you should spend more time reading such "drivel" and less time spewing drivel, eh? > You didn't state that you tested with XFree86 4.4 - which is the appropr

  1   2   >