With Squeeze things "just worked". First performance was abysmal,
dragging a window caused it to redraw it frame by frame.
After enabling non-free and installing firmware-linux-nonfree that was
fixed too. As I said before fglrx does work too but I wanted to find out why
the free drivers aren't work
Yes, and none of those resolution even have a 16:10 aspect ratio. I
would give fglrx drivers a try before doing something drastic like
upgrading to testing. Link: http://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary
--
Jordan Metzmeier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:21:18 -0500 (EST), Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>>
>>> The open source radeon drivers should work without a xorg.conf. Try
>>> moving the xorg.conf and running xse
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:00:22 -0500 (EST), Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> From my experience, the resolution issue is usually a side-effect of
> xorg falling back to vesa. xrandr can be used to adjust to resolution
> if it is not automatically configured to the proper setting.
Hmm. Perhaps you're right.
Hey,
Maybe try setting up the drivers with sgfxi?
http://techpatterns.com/forums/about933.html
Regards,
Angus.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:21:18 -0500 (EST), Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>
>> The open source radeon drivers should work without a xorg.conf. Try
>> moving the xorg.conf and running xserver without one. If you are
>> finding that without a xorg.conf
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:21:18 -0500 (EST), Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
> The open source radeon drivers should work without a xorg.conf. Try
> moving the xorg.conf and running xserver without one. If you are
> finding that without a xorg.conf it attempts to load radeon, fails,
> then falls back to ves
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:51:06 -0500 (EST), George Sullivan wrote:
> New Screen section looks like:
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "Default Screen"
> Device "Configured Video Device"
> Monitor "Configured Monitor"
> EndSection
>
> Same results. xorg won'
The open source radeon drivers should work without a xorg.conf. Try
moving the xorg.conf and running xserver without one. If you are
finding that without a xorg.conf it attempts to load radeon, fails,
then falls back to vesa you could be looking at an issue of
incompatibility.
--
Jordan Metzmeier
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>It's complaining about a missing "Device" record in the Screen section.
>The primary purpose of the Screen section is to join a Monitor section
>and a Device section in Holy Matrimony. You've got a bride defined here
>(the Monitor record) but
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:41:53 -0500 (EST), George Sullivan wrote:
> > [I] Suppose the relevant part of the log file is:
> >
> > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:05:0
> > (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
> > (EE) No d
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:12:01 -0500 (EST), George Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:41:53 -0500 (EST), George Sullivan wrote:
>>> [I] Suppose the relevant part of the log file is:
>>>
>>> (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:05:0
>>> (--) Assi
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:41:53 -0500 (EST), George Sullivan wrote:
> [I] Suppose the relevant part of the log file is:
>
> (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:05:0
> (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
> (EE) No devices detected.
Please provide your complete /etc/X11/xorg.conf f
13 matches
Mail list logo
