begin Vineet Kumar quotation:
> In my tests (and Osamu backed this up with a transcript of his testing
> session) the apt pins can only refer to 'stable' 'testing' 'unstable',
> not 'potato' 'woody' 'sid'. Part of the problem was that people who want
> to stick with woody after the release is th
* Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020514 14:10]:
> To the point, however, I would think the simplest way to stick with
> Woody as it moves from testing to stable would be for your apt.sources
> to reference it as "woody" rather than as "testing". This way, you
> always run the latest woody packa
begin Vineet Kumar quotation:
> Many people have been asking how to just stick
> with woody: they want to run a stable release but have been running
> woody because potato grew so many cobwebs.
The Mixed Metaphor Police would like to inform you that cobwebs do not
grow. Potato may have grown mo
* Ken Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 18:04]:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:59:49AM +0200, Thomas Weinbrenner wrote:
> > Matthew Daubenspeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > When woody is officially "released", does that mean it will eventually
> > > be called "stable"??
> >
> > Yes
> >
>
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:59:49AM +0200, Thomas Weinbrenner wrote:
> Matthew Daubenspeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When woody is officially "released", does that mean it will eventually
> > be called "stable"??
>
> Yes
>
> > If so, does that mean that having "testing" in my sources.list
Matthew Daubenspeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When woody is officially "released", does that mean it will eventually
> be called "stable"??
Yes
> If so, does that mean that having "testing" in my sources.list will
> actually try to grab packages from the next release?
Yes. If you don't want
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 15:38, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Don't want to stress just want to ask (i really don't want to use
> SuSE only because woody don't comes out)
Blackmailer !!! ::)) Just a joke...
--
Daniel Toffetti --- 'There is no spoon...' - The Matrix
Running the bleeding e
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:09:31AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:15:33PM -0500, dman wrote:
| > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:43:43PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
| > | You don't have to be an "insider" to know these things, just subscribe
| > | to debian-devel-announce. :) Act
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:15:33PM -0500, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:43:43PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> | You don't have to be an "insider" to know these things, just subscribe
> | to debian-devel-announce. :) Actually, it looks fairly good for early
> | next month; the worst proble
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:43:43PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:38:22PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
| > I know i know... The release date of woody isn't specified. But i ask the
| > Debian insigders here if they can say anything closer... Don't say a date...
| > say
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:38:22PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> I know i know... The release date of woody isn't specified. But i ask the
> Debian insigders here if they can say anything closer... Don't say a date...
> say a month or a season... I don't know anymore when the testing state of
Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> I know i know... The release date of woody isn't specified. But i ask the
> Debian insigders here if they can say anything closer... Don't say a date...
> say a month or a season... I don't know anymore when the testing state of
> woody began :-)
http://lists.debian.o
On Sunday 27 May 2001 12:05 pm, Jordi S. Bunster wrote:
> Ok folks, I already know Debian is only ready with it's ready, but,
> beign involved with the community, can anyone risk a probable time
> range for woody to become stable?
As far as I can tell, the main thing that's holding up woody from b
"Jordi S. Bunster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok folks, I already know Debian is only ready with it's ready, but,
>beign involved with the community, can anyone risk a probable time
>range for woody to become stable?
>
>Just wanted to know to see if I download 2.2r3 CDs or wait for
>official woody
sometime this century, maybe.
;)
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"When we have nothing left to give
There will be no reason for us to live
But when we have nothing left to lose
You will have nothing left to use"
-Fugazi
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Jordi S. Bunster wrote:
>
> Ok folks, I
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:05:18PM -0300, Jordi S. Bunster wrote:
>
> Ok folks, I already know Debian is only ready with it's ready, but,
> beign involved with the community, can anyone risk a probable time
> range for woody to become stable?
>
> Just wanted to know to see if I download 2.2r3 CDs
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:57:47PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:57:41PM -0500, S. Salman Ahmed ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > > "JH" == John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > JH> Stuart Krivis writes:
> > >> But FreeBSD also does a better job at ne
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:06:59PM -0600, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Carl Fink wrote:
[big cut]
> > it will be at least *two years* before I can install using dpkg/apt.)
>
> I seriously doubt that Woody is two years away . . .
So do I, but unstable is Sid.
--
Carl
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:25:35PM -0400, Stuart Krivis wrote:
> I've always wondered why Debian has such trouble with releases. The
> RedHat clones put stuff out regularly. Yeah, I know, Debian actually
> wants things to _work_. :-) But FreeBSD also does a better job at new
> releases, and Free
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, Stuart Krivis wrote:
>
> >
> > On Saturday, May 12, 2001, at 11:25 PM, Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > > my personal guess is that anything before late november is not going
> > > to happen. but who knows, if more people h
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Stuart Krivis wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 12, 2001, at 11:25 PM, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > my personal guess is that anything before late november is not going
> > to happen. but who knows, if more people help with boot floppies that
> > would probably help. the main thing
on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:57:41PM -0500, S. Salman Ahmed ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > "JH" == John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JH> Stuart Krivis writes:
> >> But FreeBSD also does a better job at new releases, and FreeBSD
> >> is high quality like Debian IMO.
> JH>
Stuart Krivis writes:
> But FreeBSD also does a better job at new releases, and FreeBSD is high
> quality like Debian IMO.
Compare the size of a FreeBSD release to the size of a Debian release.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Saturday, May 12, 2001, at 11:25 PM, Ethan Benson wrote:
my personal guess is that anything before late november is not going
to happen. but who knows, if more people help with boot floppies that
would probably help. the main thing is going to be seeing how many
times freezes have to be res
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:34:58AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> i know that it is not announced ahead of time, but any way, sometime ago
> i remember some comment about woody expected for august or so. is that
> right, A.F.A.Y.C.T.?
> thanks,
> t.
no the current `we smoked lots of crack and a
25 matches
Mail list logo
