Robert Wilderspin wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm wrong on this, because I'm only guessing here, but
> isn't that a duplicated step? That is, given an installation and a
> configuration of a package with no errors, isn't that verified enough?
> If the verify script ever produced a different result from
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 03:44:18AM +, Robert Wilderspin wrote:
> On 5 Jun 98 03:39:03 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
> >>
> >> Which script is it that rpm doesn't have, that dpkg does? I had thought
> >> it
> >> was the post-removal, but I'm being challen
On 5 Jun 98 03:39:03 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>>
>> Which script is it that rpm doesn't have, that dpkg does? I had thought it
>> was the post-removal, but I'm being challenged on that:
>
>None. In fact, rpm has one script debian lacks: the verify script.
F
Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> Which script is it that rpm doesn't have, that dpkg does? I had thought it
> was the post-removal, but I'm being challenged on that:
None. In fact, rpm has one script debian lacks: the verify script.
--
see shy jo
I'm on a long trip, pardon any delays in my
4 matches
Mail list logo
