> lina writes:
[…]
> May I ask further, which is the best (systematic) way of learning the
> script, based on all your experience.
Personally, my own way of learning Shell was hardly a
“systematic” one. However, just for the record, I've used the
GNU bash manual
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:33 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
> Which 'script' are you referring to?
>
> If it is bash, I'll refer you to the 50 page monolith of a man page for that
> (a must read whatever you do anyway imo)
>
> If you're referring to something else...?
Those are something I even don't kno
Which 'script' are you referring to?
If it is bash, I'll refer you to the 50 page monolith of a man page for that
(a must read whatever you do anyway imo)
If you're referring to something else...?
If you are in fact dealing with scientific data, I think the
bioperl.orgpage is a good starting poi
Thanks for all.
May I ask further, which is the best (systematic) way of learning the
script, based on all your experience.
Welcome any advice,
Thanks with regards,
lina
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:54 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011 4:28 AM, "Ivan Shmakov" wrote:
>>
>> > shawn
On Jul 27, 2011 4:28 AM, "Ivan Shmakov" wrote:
>
> > shawn wilson writes:
> > However, I'd look at some of the bio perl modules if this was the
> > type of data I was looking at. Either way, learning dozens of tools
> > to manipulate lots of data is quite time consuming, prone to failure
> shawn wilson writes:
> On Jul 27, 2011 3:44 AM, "Ivan Shmakov" wrote:
[…]
>> While I've little to say about using a database for this case, I'd
>> strongly recommend /against/ using any office-like solutions for
>> data processing, as these are generally overweight and rarely
>> c
On Jul 27, 2011 3:44 AM, "Ivan Shmakov" wrote:
>
> > shawn wilson writes:
>
> […]
>
> > Might I recommend a plethora of free database solutions available to
> > you? I see this type of question quite frequently and am stunned to
> > see such a thing here (or on other mailing lists for pla
> shawn wilson writes:
[…]
> Might I recommend a plethora of free database solutions available to
> you? I see this type of question quite frequently and am stunned to
> see such a thing here (or on other mailing lists for platforms just a
> poorly suited for such data). I'm not sure wh
Might I recommend a plethora of free database solutions available to you?
I see this type of question quite frequently and am stunned to see such a
thing here (or on other mailing lists for platforms just a poorly suited for
such data). I'm not sure what your data is from or what it is for but I
a
> lina writes:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[…]
>> $ sed -e 's/^\(\s*\w\+\s\+[^0-9[:blank:]]\+\)\([[:digit:]]\+\)/\1 \2/' \
>> | sort -nk 3,3 -k1,1 \
>> | sed -e 's/^\(\s*\w\+\s\+[^0-9[:blank:]]\+\)\s\([[:digit:]]\+\)/\1\2/'
> Thanks, but there i
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> lina writes:
>
> First of all, a kindly reminder: there's a news:comp.unix.shell
> newsgroup (also available via Google Groups [1], though a proper
> newsreader software is recommended), with a few truly
> kn
> lina writes:
First of all, a kindly reminder: there's a news:comp.unix.shell
newsgroup (also available via Google Groups [1], though a proper
newsreader software is recommended), with a few truly
knowledgeable folks among the subscribers, which such question
I just remember the sort command, but I still don't know how to get
the ideal one,
after I tried the sort -n -k2 ,
something changed on field 2 but it's still a bit away from the one I need.
I attached the text,
Thanks,
238CHO C10 3617 1.697 5.334 9.317
238CHO C11 3624 1.665
13 matches
Mail list logo
