Sven Joachim wrote:
Apparently java-gcj-compat depends on java-gcj-compat-headless, on
which gcj-jre-headless conflicts. Now why apt-get refuses to uninstall
java-gcj-compat-headless in favor of gcj-jre-headless is unclear, but
apt-get *never* tells _why_ some package "is not going to be
insta
On 2016-07-04 15:50 +0200, Giovanni Gigante wrote:
> I have a wheezy installation (itself upgraded from previous versions)
> that I now want to upgrade to jessie.
> I was following the instructions for the preparation to the upgrade to
> jessie, and I got this:
>
> # dpkg --audit
> The following p
On Monday 04 July 2016 14:50:21 Giovanni Gigante wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a wheezy installation (itself upgraded from previous versions)
> that I now want to upgrade to jessie.
> I was following the instructions for the preparation to the upgrade to
> jessie, and I got this:
>
> # dpkg --audit
> Th
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Did you run "apt-get update"?
Sure.
Also... I used to get that message a lot about holding packages back..
People talk about "pinning" packages here. I've never done that but it
might be one answer if you've ever actively done that yourself. I
*a-sume* you'd have to u
On 7/4/16, Giovanni Gigante wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a wheezy installation (itself upgraded from previous versions)
> that I now want to upgrade to jessie.
> I was following the instructions for the preparation to the upgrade to
> jessie, and I got this:
>
> # dpkg --audit
> The following packages
5 matches
Mail list logo
