Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-04 Thread S Scharf
> Hi > > After having the xorg problem I downgrade the X in this way. > > 1_ Add the next debian snapshot repository to the sources.list: deb > http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110924/ wheezy main > contrib non-free > > 2_ Update the repositories, I got the next error: Release file for >

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-04 Thread AlbMilla
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 16:03, S Scharf wrote: > >> >> When I try to downgrade to the stable xserver-xorg-core (1.7.7), it >> breaks far too many things (nvidia-glx, and a bunch of others), so I >> abandoned that effort.  But, what do you know, now I'm using Chrome >> instead of Iceweasel, and ever

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-03 Thread S Scharf
> > When I try to downgrade to the stable xserver-xorg-core (1.7.7), it > breaks far too many things (nvidia-glx, and a bunch of others), so I > abandoned that effort. But, what do you know, now I'm using Chrome > instead of Iceweasel, and everything now seems to be humming along. > So, at least i

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 04:55 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 22:39 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > On 2011-10-01 18:16 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > It could be, that you are using the FLOSS nouveau driver, this driver > > > usually is a PITA. > > > > Could you please stop

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 22:39 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2011-10-01 18:16 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > It could be, that you are using the FLOSS nouveau driver, this driver > > usually is a PITA. > > Could you please stop this FUD, or at least back it up with something > useful (i.e. bug r

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 00:58 +0800, lina wrote: > On Oct 2, 2011, at 0:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 00:03 +0800, lina wrote: > >> On Oct 1, 2011, at 23:50, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:04 +0800, lina wrote: > My Sid one after updating also g

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Hi Wolodja, >>     http://snapshot.debian.org/ >> >> I would also recommend to install apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges. Good >> luck! > > I already did! And I tested a little bit more. First I downgraded everything > to xserver-xorg 1.7.3.

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-10-01 18:16 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > It could be, that you are using the FLOSS nouveau driver, this driver > usually is a PITA. Could you please stop this FUD, or at least back it up with something useful (i.e. bug reports)? > There're packages for proprietary NVIDIA drivers. Yes, a

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Hi Wolodja, > http://snapshot.debian.org/ > > I would also recommend to install apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges. Good > luck! I already did! And I tested a little bit more. First I downgraded everything to xserver-xorg 1.7.3. Then step-by-step updated again. I could find out, the proble is

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 20:47 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011 schrieb Wolodja Wentland: > > On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 13:23 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > > 7. I reverted to xserver-xorg version before the last one, but although > > > it was a little bit better, it was

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011 schrieb Wolodja Wentland: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 13:23 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > 7. I reverted to xserver-xorg version before the last one, but although > > it was a little bit better, it was not good as expected. > > Reverted from to which version? Which dri

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 13:23 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > 7. I reverted to xserver-xorg version before the last one, but although it > was > a little bit better, it was not good as expected. Reverted from to which version? Which driver (exactly) are you using? How is it installed? Please al

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:13 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > > Henrique, I already mentioned it: It is the process "Xorg", which hangs. > > > > Hm? I locked some packages by Synapti

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:13 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Henrique, I already mentioned it: It is the process "Xorg", which hangs. > > Hm? I locked some packages by Synaptic, not the package "xorg", but it > anyway currently won't be upg

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:13 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Henrique, I already mentioned it: It is the process "Xorg", which hangs. Hm? I locked some packages by Synaptic, not the package "xorg", but it anyway currently won't be upgraded, regarding to the packages that are locked/pinned. I've go

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > See if you can track down the processes which are causing trouble. That > > will help narrow down the search. > Henrique, I already mentioned it: It is the process "Xorg", which hangs. Then you have to look no further than the GPU driver. It can ca

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote, on 10/01/11 17:19: > As you see, everything is normal. I am running in mode 1440x900. > > Best regards > > Hans > Yes, I also see nothing unsusual. If you know that the X-server is eating the cpu-time, try to see what it is doing with strace. As super user command str

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread lina
On Oct 2, 2011, at 0:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 00:03 +0800, lina wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2011, at 23:50, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:04 +0800, lina wrote: My Sid one after updating also get retard. Lina >>> >>> Do Hans and you use the

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 00:03 +0800, lina wrote: > On Oct 1, 2011, at 23:50, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:04 +0800, lina wrote: > >> My Sid one after updating also get retard. > >> > >> Lina > > > > Do Hans and you use the nouveau driver? If so, I recommend to use the > >

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:23:48 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > I remarked, that after the last update, my system is very very slow. But > first of all, please let me explain, what is slow and what I could find > out. > > 1. When iceweasel is started, process Xorg increases to 100 percent and > abou

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011 schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2011, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > All tests I made, are reproducable. > > Try also running workload inspectors, one of them might give you a hint or > two about the culprit: > > top (immediate readings) > atop (ex

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:04 +0800, lina wrote: > > My Sid one after updating also get retard. > > > > Lina > > Do Hans and you use the nouveau driver? If so, I recommend to use the > proprietary or to downgrade X to stable and to use the nv driv

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:04 +0800, lina wrote: > My Sid one after updating also get retard. > > Lina Do Hans and you use the nouveau driver? If so, I recommend to use the proprietary or to downgrade X to stable and to use the nv driver. For the Linux audio community this driver is known as unusa

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 13:23 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Hello all, > > I remarked, that after the last update, my system is very very slow. > But first > of all, please let me explain, what is slow and what I could find out. > > 1. When iceweasel is started, process Xorg increases to 100 per

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > All tests I made, are reproducable. Try also running workload inspectors, one of them might give you a hint or two about the culprit: top (immediate readings) atop (excellent for historic readings and cummulative readings) powertop (interrupt st

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jörg-Volker Peetz: > What is the output of > > glxinfo | grep render > > and of > > grep -E '\((EE|WW)\)' /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > and of > > grep abled /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > ? Hi Jörg-Volker, I know, what you are thinking, but it is no problem wit

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
What is the output of glxinfo | grep render and of grep -E '\((EE|WW)\)' /var/log/Xorg.0.log and of grep abled /var/log/Xorg.0.log ? -- Best regards, Jörg-Volker. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Re: wheezy after update significant slow

2011-10-01 Thread lina
My Sid one after updating also get retard. Lina On Oct 1, 2011, at 19:23, "Hans-J. Ullrich" wrote: > Hello all, > > I remarked, that after the last update, my system is very very slow. But > first > of all, please let me explain, what is slow and what I could find out. > > 1. When icewease