On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:57:03 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:27:40PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>>It seems to be documented in the man page:
>>http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bridge-utils-
interfaces&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=Debian+testing+%28wheezy%
29&for
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:27:40PM +, Camaleón wrote:
It seems to be documented in the man page:
http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bridge-utils-interfaces&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=Debian+testing+%28wheezy%29&format=html&locale=en
Ah, yes, I see it now. I looked in the sect
On Thu, 31 May 2012 15:12:25 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Since the upgrade of bridge-utils from 1.5-2 to 1.5-3 (testing) my
> bridge doesn’t get its IPv4 configuration anymore, only the IPv6
> configuration.
>
> While I may have found a workaround (I’ll test it tomorrow), I found bug
> #319832.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
[ifupdown]
I thought this was supposed to be one of the new features, sorry if
I was mistaken.
Maybe it is, but it’s not documented? At least I didn’t find anything in
the changelog.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| St
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:15:44PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:51:22PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >Note sure if this will help, but have you tried the latest ifupdown
> >from unstable (1.7.0). It should bring a number of improvements,
> >including having v4/v6 address
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:51:22PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Note sure if this will help, but have you tried the latest ifupdown
from unstable (1.7.0). It should bring a number of improvements,
including having v4/v6 addresses in the same stanza, IIRC.
The latest ifupdown in testing/unstable i
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:12:25PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Since the upgrade of bridge-utils from 1.5-2 to 1.5-3 (testing) my
> bridge doesn’t get its IPv4 configuration anymore, only the IPv6
> configuration.
...
> So what are the future plans? It would be great as well if I could
> de-/conf
If you set the netmask for all the aliases (eth0:0 etc.) to
255.255.255.255, do you get the result you want?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f106590
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:23:30AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> There are a number of long-standing bugs raised against ifupdown
> (#168776, #464562 and #496591) which relate to this.
ifupdown now has an active maintainer, and I'm sure patches
would be welcome.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roge
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 03:48:56PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Bob Proulx a écrit :
>
[cut]
> Eventually when ifupdown has migrated it will be doing vitually the
> same thing as the above. It will simply be doing it internally.
> Previous versions of 'ifupdown' called if
Bob Proulx a écrit :
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Bob Proulx a écrit :
>
>>> up ip addr add 10.25.48.141/24 dev eth0 label eth0:0
>>> down ip addr del 10.25.48.141/24 dev eth0 label eth0:0
>>
>> That sucks big time. Don't tell me it is the new official way to replace
>> aliases.
>
> It d
> Pings from the same subnet work for all of the interfaces/ip addresses
> Pings from other subnets only work for the primary interface/address.
Do you have a firewall blocking ping (aka ICMP echo-request)? Sounds
like a firewall problem.
Are you talking about outgoing pings or incoming pings?
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: virtual interfaces not routing properly.
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Bob Proulx a écrit :
> > Instead I prefer setting up the dependent aliased virtual interfaces
>
> Please don't call ethX:Y virtual interfaces. They are not interfaces.
> Only ifconfig arti
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Bob Proulx a écrit :
> > Instead I prefer setting up the dependent aliased virtual interfaces
>
> Please don't call ethX:Y virtual interfaces. They are not interfaces.
> Only ifconfig artificially treats them as interfaces. They cannot be
> used as interfaces by other tool
Hello,
Bob Proulx a écrit :
>
> Instead I prefer setting up the dependent aliased virtual interfaces
Please don't call ethX:Y virtual interfaces. They are not interfaces.
Only ifconfig artificially treats them as interfaces. They cannot be
used as interfaces by other tools nor by the kernel.
>
Gareth Walters (2K Australia) wrote:
> But its not working out side the same subnet (i.e. routing is wrong)
What is wrong about it? Can you show the routing table and identify
what is incorrect? Since you don't show the problem there isn't a way
to guess.
> /etc/network/interfaces
> auto lo et
On 12/01/12 14:12, Gareth Walters (2K Australia) wrote:
> G'day all,
> I need some help..
>
> I am trying to get Squeeze ( 6.0.3 AMD64) to have a few virtual
> interfaces so I can setup some SSL sites in apache.
> But its not working out side the same subnet (i.e. routing is wrong)
> I have tried
Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:10:43AM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
>> Here's the problem - eth0 and eth0:0 are identical, so you have defined
>> the interface twice.
>
> really? I can bind eth0 and eth0:0 to different IPs on my 2.4 box no
> problem.
I just tested this on my system
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:10:43AM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> > dedicated-deb-17boom:/etc/apache2# ifconfig
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:94:A2:1B
> > inet addr:'mainIP' Bcast:'mainIPfragment'.255
>
> > eth0:0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:94:A2:1B
> >
Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:07:55PM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:07:08AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>> > 1. adding the needed paragraph to /etc/network/interfaces to reflect
>> > the virtual iface with 'anotherIP',
>> > 2. adding the corres
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:07:55PM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:07:08AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > After
> > 1. adding the needed paragraph to /etc/network/interfaces to reflect
> > the virtual iface with 'anotherIP',
> > 2. adding the corresponding file in /etc
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:07:08AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> After
> 1. adding the needed paragraph to /etc/network/interfaces to reflect
> the virtual iface with 'anotherIP',
> 2. adding the corresponding file in /etc/apache2/sites-available,
> 3. creating the symlink in /etc/apache2/sit
22 matches
Mail list logo
