Re: vfat/msdos depend on fat

1996-08-21 Thread Doug Federman
On Tue, 20 Aug 1996, Michael Meskes wrote: > Jean Orloff writes: > > Since I'm there: `ps` is also broken in my custom 2.0.0 kernel. It complains > > about being unable to find libproc.so. Any chance this may be cured at the > > same > > time? I got into the trouble of making a custom kernel beca

Re: vfat/msdos depend on fat

1996-08-20 Thread Michael Meskes
Jean Orloff writes: > Since I'm there: `ps` is also broken in my custom 2.0.0 kernel. It complains > about being unable to find libproc.so. Any chance this may be cured at the > same > time? I got into the trouble of making a custom kernel because of the PS/2 > mouse problem amply mentionned befor

Re: vfat/msdos depend on fat

1996-08-19 Thread Jean Orloff
Michael> Hamish Moffatt writes: >> I compiled a custom kernel last night, and made fat, msdos and vfat all >> modules. msdos and vfat depend on fat to operate, and it seems that >> /etc/modules gets processed later than mounting all file systems; Michael> That's what the auto option is for.

Re: vfat/msdos depend on fat

1996-08-19 Thread Michael Meskes
Hamish Moffatt writes: > I compiled a custom kernel last night, and made fat, msdos and vfat all > modules. msdos and vfat depend on fat to operate, and it seems that > /etc/modules gets processed later than mounting all file systems; That's what the auto option is for. > vfat gets inserted befor