Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-07 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:26:10AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:54:16PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:32:51PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:18:23AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > > > > Does sid > > > > (suddenly?) be

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-06 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:54:16PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:32:51PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:18:23AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > > > Does sid > > > (suddenly?) become testing? > > > > No. sid will always be unstable. > > I thought th

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-06 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:32:51PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:18:23AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > > Does sid > > (suddenly?) become testing? > > No. sid will always be unstable. > I thought the version after woody would be sid...

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 08:26:44PM -0600, Timothy R. Butler wrote: > > above to this: > > >unstable -> sid > > >??? -> testing > > >stable -> woody > > Does ??? equal "buzz" or "lightyear" this time around? It certainly won't be buzz, and is vanishingly unlikely to be lightyear, because

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-02 Thread Brian Nelson
"Timothy R. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > above to this: > > >unstable -> sid > > >??? -> testing > > >stable -> woody > > Does ??? equal "buzz" or "lightyear" this time around? Buzz was used for Debian 1.0, or something like that. Last I heard, Woody+1 will be "sarge". --

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Timothy" == Timothy R Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> above to this: >> >unstable -> sid >> >??? -> testing >> >stable -> woody Timothy> Does ??? equal "buzz" or "lightyear" this time around? Perhaps sarge. manoj -- I came to MIT to get an education for

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-03-01 Thread Timothy R. Butler
> above to this: > >unstable -> sid > >??? -> testing > >stable -> woody Does ??? equal "buzz" or "lightyear" this time around? -Tim -- Timothy R. Butler[EMAIL PROTECTED] Universal Networks

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-02-28 Thread Colin Watson
Dave Sherohman wrote: >On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:18:23AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: >> What happens to testing when woody becomes stable? > >Some time before woody becomes stable, it will be frozen and a new >name will be assigned to testing. testing will go on receiving >packages from unstable jus

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-02-27 Thread Chris Jenks
At 03:32 PM 2/27/02, Dave Sherohman wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:18:23AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > What happens to testing when woody becomes stable? Some time before woody becomes stable, it will be frozen and a new name will be assigned to testing. testing will go on receiving packages

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-02-27 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:18:23AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > What happens to testing when woody becomes stable? Some time before woody becomes stable, it will be frozen and a new name will be assigned to testing. testing will go on receiving packages from unstable just like it does today. So we

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-02-27 Thread Eric Richardson
Ken Irving wrote: > I'm wondering about the difference between using "woody" vs "testing" in apt-sources. I currently have "testing" in my systems, but perhaps > "woody" might be preferable. Assuming woody (as current testing) does > what I need, it ought to continue being sufficient once it

Re: using Woody vs testing

2002-02-27 Thread Jeff
Ken Irving, 2002-Feb-27 09:18 -0900: > > I'm wondering about the difference between using "woody" vs "testing" > in apt-sources. I currently have "testing" in my systems, but perhaps > "woody" might be preferable. Assuming woody (as current testing) does > what I need, it ought to continue being