Re: users still logged in

2002-11-12 Thread Vineet Kumar
* nate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021108 20:09]: > Matthew Daubenspeck said: > > After having a mess of connection problems that caused my ssh sessions to > > drop, I noticed that the 'w' command still thinks there are users logged > > in that I know are not. > check the process table to see if shells f

Re: users still logged in

2002-11-12 Thread Krzysztof Mazurczyk
On Fri, 8/Nov/02 20:01:35, nate wrote: > check the process table to see if shells for those ttys are still > open. > > e.g. > > [aphro@portal:~]$ w > 20:00:16 up 9 days, 1:31, 2 users, load average: 1.38, 0.69, 0.60 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT > ap

Re: users still logged in

2002-11-09 Thread Matthew Daubenspeck
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:01:35PM -0800, nate wrote: > > After having a mess of connection problems that caused my ssh sessions to > > drop, I noticed that the 'w' command still thinks there are users logged > > in that I know are not. > > check the process table to see if shells for those ttys a

Re: users still logged in

2002-11-08 Thread nate
Matthew Daubenspeck said: > After having a mess of connection problems that caused my ssh sessions to > drop, I noticed that the 'w' command still thinks there are users logged > in that I know are not. check the process table to see if shells for those ttys are still open. e.g. [aphro@portal:~