On 1/2/08, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You didn't say what libraries they are or what packages they come from
> (use dpkg -S to find the latter out). But on my system the only 64-bit
dpkg -S /lib64 returns libc6-amd64 for all the libraries in /lib64.
So I ended up removing tha
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:26:18PM -0800, David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 12/31/07, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> snip some stuff
>
>
> > I'm not aware of ever intentionally doing anything to install any 64bit
> > libs. My whole system is running as 32-bit.
>
On 12/31/07, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip some stuff
> I'm not aware of ever intentionally doing anything to install any 64bit
> libs. My whole system is running as 32-bit.
MIne too (I don't do AMD64 because I don't have an AMD64, sniff).
But I also see 64 bit stuff in /lib64.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/08 11:23, charlie derr wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 12/31/07 15:48, charlie derr wrote:
>> [snip]
Of course, I would do all this from the (real) console, not a GNOME
terminal window.
>>> you're just chicken :-]
>>
>> Real Men
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 15:48, charlie derr wrote:
[snip]
Of course, I would do all this from the (real) console, not a GNOME
terminal window.
you're just chicken :-]
Real Men use the console. I'm not sure what Real Women use.
Yeah, I
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-01-02 17:42 +0100, charlie derr wrote:
After continuing through a few more upgrades (actually, I got the word
that I should now be using "safe-upgrade", so was using that when I
remembered), I'm now almost fully up to date (kde wants to uninstall
itself when I try to
On 2008-01-02 17:42 +0100, charlie derr wrote:
> After continuing through a few more upgrades (actually, I got the word
> that I should now be using "safe-upgrade", so was using that when I
> remembered), I'm now almost fully up to date (kde wants to uninstall
> itself when I try to upgrade kdebas
Thanks again for explaining everything.
After continuing through a few more upgrades (actually, I got the word that I should now be using "safe-upgrade", so was using
that when I remembered), I'm now almost fully up to date (kde wants to uninstall itself when I try to upgrade kdebase, so I'm
pu
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:09:53AM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> aptitude-create-state-bundle doesn't apparently exist on my system -- was
> this a relatively recent addition to aptitude? (it may have been a year or
> slightly longer since I've upgraded aptitude)
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:59:16PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
Daniel Burrows wrote:
It would be interesting to know what ldd /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 says.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt$ ldd /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
linux-gate.so.1 =
I missed this message until just now, thanks so much for all the info I snipped
out, I'm going to try to understand it now.
aptitude-create-state-bundle doesn't apparently exist on my system -- was this a relatively recent addition to aptitude? (it may
have been a year or slightly longer sin
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 15:48, charlie derr wrote:
[snip]
Of course, I would do all this from the (real) console, not a GNOME
terminal window.
you're just chicken :-]
Real Men use the console. I'm not sure what Real Women use.
(i'm stil
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 18:34:55 -0500, charlie derr wrote:
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /sbin/ldconfig -pNX | grep 'libz\.so'
libz.so.1 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1
libz.so.1 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libz.so.1
libz.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 15:48, charlie derr wrote:
>
[snip]
>
>> Of course, I would do all this from the (real) console, not a GNOME
>> terminal window.
>
> you're just chicken :-]
Real Men use the console. I'm not sure what Real Women use.
> (i'm still in t
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 06:34:55PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> I'm not aware of ever intentionally doing anything to install any 64bit libs.
> My whole system is running as 32-bit.
Note that this has nothing to do with 64-bit libraries. The "64" in
gzopen64 me
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 18:34:55 -0500, charlie derr wrote:
[...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /sbin/ldconfig -pNX | grep 'libz\.so'
> libz.so.1 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1
> libz.so.1 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libz.so.1
> libz.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libz.so
> li
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:02:01PM -0800, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> You may want to check if anything else has been placed in
> /usr/local/bin or /usr/local/lib, and what the timestamps are (run
> "ls -l /usr/local/bin /usr/local/lib"), as any other files in there
>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:59:16PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> It would be interesting to know what ldd /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 says.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt$ ldd /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7fb7000)
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-8 compression library - runtime
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt$ ldd /usr/bin/gconftool-2 | grep libz
libz.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7be)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/v
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 16:31:37 -0500, charlie derr wrote:
> Thanks much for the help.
>>
>> gzopen64 should be defined in /usr/lib/libz.so.1; something is wrong
>> with this on your system. Post the output of the following commands:
[...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt$ dpkg -l zlib1g
[...
Charlie,
In this kind of situation, I would "# apt-get --purge remove" the
problematic package(s), then "# apt-get update" and try again.
as Daniel and Florian have pointed out elsewhere in this thread, my problem is with libxml2 being completely borken at the moment
(I think) and aptitude
Thanks much for the help.
gzopen64 should be defined in /usr/lib/libz.so.1; something is wrong
with this on your system. Post the output of the following commands:
dpkg -l zlib1g
ldd /usr/bin/gconftool-2 | grep libz
ldd /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 | grep libz
nm -D /usr/lib/libz.so.1 | grep gzopen
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 05:28:48PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
It's been a while, but I just attempted a massive upgrade (executing "aptitude
upgrade") and ended up with:
Errors were encountered while processing:
The interesting thing is
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:00:42PM -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/31/07 11:42, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > I don't know any reason that mixing apt-get and aptitude should cause
> > problems, particularly this pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 11:42, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:01:32PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
The following packages will be upgraded:
gnome-session libgnome2-common libgnomevfs2-common shared-mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 09:15, charlie derr wrote:
> http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/door/SidGnomeRefusingToDie
>
>
> It seemed like there was too much output there to want to burden the
> list with it all (but I thought someone clueful might still possibly
>
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:01:32PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
>>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>>> gnome-session libgnome2-common libgnomevfs2-common shared-mime-info
>>> 4 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 795 not upgraded.
>>> Need
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 05:28:48PM -0500, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> It's been a while, but I just attempted a massive upgrade (executing
> "aptitude upgrade") and ended up with:
>
> Errors were encountered while processing:
The interesting thing is why these packages
http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/door/SidGnomeRefusingToDie
It seemed like there was too much output there to want to burden the list with it all (but I thought someone clueful might still
possibly catch something I haven't)
my working assumption at this point is that last night either manua
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 20:29:09 -0500, charlie derr wrote:
> charlie derr wrote:
[...]
>> delete:~# dpkg -l libxml2 gconf2 | awk '/^[^D|+]/{print $1,$2,$3}'
>> ii gconf2 2.20.1-2
>> ii libxml2 2.6.30.dfsg-3
[...]
>> delete:~# /usr/bin/python -V
>> Python 2.4.4
That looks OK to me; I have the
charlie derr wrote:
The above is in response to apt-get -f install (what used to work in
the past for fixing issues, maybe that's my mistake?)
It is better to use "aptitude install -f" if aptitude is your package
manager of choice.
Anyway, it seems that you have a problem running update-
The above is in response to apt-get -f install (what used to work in
the past for fixing issues, maybe that's my mistake?)
It is better to use "aptitude install -f" if aptitude is your package
manager of choice.
Anyway, it seems that you have a problem running update-gconf-defaults,
which
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 17:28:48 -0500, charlie derr wrote:
> It's been a while, but I just attempted a massive upgrade (executing
> "aptitude upgrade") and ended up with:
>
>
> Setting up debhelper (5.0.63) ...
> Errors were encountered while processing:
[...]
> So I fiddled a bit without succes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
charlie derr wrote:
> It's been a while, but I just attempted a massive upgrade (executing
> "aptitude upgrade") and ended up with:
(...)
> E: I wasn't able to locate file for the desktop-base package. This might
> mean you need to manually fix this pa
34 matches
Mail list logo
