On 06/08/01 17:02:57 -0700, Jeremiah H. Savage wrote:
> >From my experience of upgrading from Potato, I've found it's best to do a
> couple of 'apt-get install [foo]' before doing the whole 'dist-upgrade.' The
> first foo I install is 'dpkg' (fewer segfaults later on that way), then 'apt'.
> Upgrad
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:25:56PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I'm not sure if I've screwed up here, but I decided to upgrade from
> potato to woody last night, but now I can't seem to get X
> reconfigured. Looking at dselect, it looks as if I have packages from
> both 3.3 and 4.0 versions of X in
"Daniel J. Mashao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> problems. 1.2 worked fine, but I upgraded to 1.3.1 and now my monitor does
> not do 800x600.
Did you try
su
mv /etc/X11/XF86Config /etc/X11/XF86Config.old
# Just want to make sure there aren't any old ones lying around to
# confuse XF86Se
Here is what the upgrading notes say on the subject. I believe that this
will address all of your problems. Maybe it will help someone else avoid
your difficulties.
To get a smooth upgrade from 1.1 or 1.2 make sure to install the following,
by hand after first clearing the available file as follow
> "Joost" == Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Snip: there are problems upgrading direct from 1.1 to 1.3]
Joost> If you or others can shed some light on what goes wrong, I will
Joost> look into that. I have an Infomagic 1.1.something cd (september
Joost> 96) and a 1.3.0 "oficial" cd.
On Mon, 25 Aug 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > P.S. One reason to have 1.1 is because the base disk will work on the
> > thinkpads that reject the 1.2 and 1.3. I think this could be fixed if we
> > released a rescue disk that doesn't need to be a bzima
bruce wrote,
>
> We want it to be easy for people to upgrade. However, it's currently
> difficult for people who had 1.1 on their systems to upgrade to 1.3,
> because the best way to do this was to install 1.2 and then 1.3 . You can
> go straight from 1.1 to 1.3, but I hear this is much more diffi
Bruce Perens wrote:
> When you look at the size of our FTP archive it's clear we need to remove
> stuff eventually. I'd be happy to have a site where old stuff could remain
> for a much longer time - is anyone still keeping 1.2 on-line?
Take a look at ftp://debian.crosslink.net/pub/debian-old/
The
> We want it to be easy for people to upgrade. However, it's currently
> difficult for people who had 1.1 on their systems to upgrade to 1.3,
> because the best way to do this was to install 1.2 and then 1.3 . You can
> go straight from 1.1 to 1.3, but I hear this is much more difficult.
> We kept
Hi,
>>"Daniel" == Daniel J Mashao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
>> Bruce Perens wrote:
>>
>> We want it to be easy for people to upgrade. However, it's
>> currently difficult for people who had 1.1 on their systems to
>> upgrade to 1.3, because the b
On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> We want it to be easy for people to upgrade. However, it's currently
> difficult for people who had 1.1 on their systems to upgrade to 1.3,
> because the best way to do this was to install 1.2 and then 1.3 . You can
I understand y
On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> Should I just select EVERYTHING?
YIKES! Don't do THAT! You will spend so much time in the conflict
resolution screen that you will NEVER figure out what to do!
You might take a close look at the packages marked IMPORTANT first.
Select which of these you
On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Edouard Katz wrote:
> Have decide recently to move to Debian (fully support its policy) so I went
> on the net and found the necessary stuff to install the base1_3 system.
> Installed very well without a problem on my old 486/33 no CD. The only way
> to install from a CD is
At 17:13 17/6/97 +0200, you wrote:
>
>
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Edouard Katz wrote:
>
>> At 22:58 16/6/97 +0200, you wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >On Mon, 16 Jun 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have a standalone Debian 1.2 machine ;( - so here is what I plan to do:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Identify all packa
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Joost Kooij wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have a standalone Debian 1.2 machine ;( - so here is what I plan to do:
> >
> > 1. Identify all packages that where updated on 1.3 and dld them, including
> >the Packages file.
> >
> > 2. Up
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a standalone Debian 1.2 machine ;( - so here is what I plan to do:
>
> 1. Identify all packages that where updated on 1.3 and dld them, including
>the Packages file.
>
> 2. Updating dpkg:
>dpkg --clear-avail
>dpkg -i ldso_*.deb
16 matches
Mail list logo
