Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
> repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
> glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
> reasonable chance that this will not break
Hi!
* Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060507 20:25]:
> That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3 for stable,
> and i'm really looking for 2.4. Guess I'll have to wait a little
> longer.
Than you might try to create your own backported package by fetching the
source package an
Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
It is *very* unsafe. The amavisd-new package is in backports. I would
just use that instead.
http://backports.org/instructions.html
Thanks, Roberto,
That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> It is *very* unsafe. The amavisd-new package is in backports. I would
> just use that instead.
>
> http://backports.org/instructions.html
Thanks, Roberto,
That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3 for stable,
and i'
Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
> repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
> glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
> reasonable chance that this will not break anythin
5 matches
Mail list logo
