Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-22 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
update-rc.d my-program defaults 20 80 update-rc.d my-program defaults start 20 2 3 4 5 . stop 80 0 1 6 . Support for run levels in "start" and "stop" subcommands was dropped from update-rc.d by Roger Leigh in 2013. You'll find that the command has been warning you about using explicit run lev

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-17 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, CN writes: > On Sun, May 15, 2016, at 10:05 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> That doesn't look correct: unless you defined a "$postgresql" system >> facility (in /etc/insserv.conf), you should require "postgresql" and >> not "$postgresql". >> > > Many thanks for the correction, which seems to ha

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-17 Thread CN
Hi! Ansgar, On Sun, May 15, 2016, at 10:05 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > That doesn't look correct: unless you defined a "$postgresql" system > facility (in /etc/insserv.conf), you should require "postgresql" and > not "$postgresql". > Many thanks for the correction, which seems to have fixed

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-15 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, CN writes: > /etc/init.d/my-program is correctly prepared with LSB header comments > like this: > > #!/bin/sh > ### BEGIN INIT INFO > # Provides: my-program > # Required-Start: $postgresql > # Required-Stop:$postgresql > # Default-Start:2 3 4 5 > # Default-St

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 13 May 2016 16:10:17 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 03:35:29PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > [...] > > > But for the above comparison to work correctly, you (and everybody > > responding to your message) would have to post the version number of > > the parent package

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 13.05.2016 um 16:16 schrieb CN: > On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 09:14 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >> Jessie/Sid here. But the more important thing is... what version of >> sysv-rc is yours? What update-rc.d are you using? >> > > "dpkg -l sysv-rc" show this from local host: > > ii sysv-rc2.8

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 03:35:29PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: [...] > But for the above comparison to work correctly, you (and everybody > responding to your message) would have to post the version number of the > parent package that held this file

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 13 May 2016 10:16:00 CN wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 09:14 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Jessie/Sid here. But the more important thing is... what version of > > sysv-rc is yours? What update-rc.d are you using? > > "dpkg -l sysv-rc" show this from local host: > > ii sysv-rc

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:16:00PM +0800, CN wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 09:14 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Jessie/Sid here. But the more important thing is... what version of > > sysv-rc is yours? What update-rc.d are you using? > > > > "dp

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread CN
On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 09:14 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > Jessie/Sid here. But the more important thing is... what version of > sysv-rc is yours? What update-rc.d are you using? > "dpkg -l sysv-rc" show this from local host: ii sysv-rc2.88dsf-41+deb7u1 "2.88dsf-59" from my VPS provid

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:09:56PM +0800, CN wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 08:46 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > Bizarre. Just tried in my box and it behaves as it should. It comes from > > > > sysv-rc 2.88dsf-41+deb7u1 > > > > What versio

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread CN
On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 08:46 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Bizarre. Just tried in my box and it behaves as it should. It comes from > > sysv-rc 2.88dsf-41+deb7u1 > > What version is yours? And... just to double-check: > > tomas@rasputin:~$ sha1sum /usr/sbin/update-rc.d > 19d097b7dbe7

Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers

2016-05-13 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 07:54:55PM +0800, CN wrote: > Hi! [...] > Both of these two commands > > update-rc.d my-program defaults 20 80 > update-rc.d my-program defaults start 20 2 3 4 5 . stop 80 0 1 6 . > > yield the same incorrect sequence numbers

Re: update-rc.d question

2013-08-20 Thread Bob Proulx
François Patte wrote: > While installing some packages, I get this message: > > update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; > falling back to defaults > > What does it mean? Sid Unstable and Jessie Testing have moved on past hard listed boot number ordering and have gon

Re: update-rc.d question

2013-08-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 09:42 +0200, François Patte wrote: > Le 18/08/2013 12:37, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > > On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 12:35 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 12:26 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >>> update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported;

Re: update-rc.d question

2013-08-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 12:35 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 12:26 +0200, François Patte wrote: > > update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; > > falling back to defaults > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717553 What packages did yo

Re: update-rc.d question

2013-08-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 12:26 +0200, François Patte wrote: > update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; > falling back to defaults http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717553 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: update-rc.d error: using dependency based boot sequencing?

2013-07-02 Thread Bob Proulx
Art Huston wrote: > I added /etc/init.d/tightvncserver to start a VNC server. It looks fine -- > I have the LSB comments and it works when invoked directly from the > command-line, e.g. > > cd /etc/init.d > ./tightvncserver start > > But update-rc.d gives an error: > > root@debian01:/etc/init.d#

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread Willie Wonka
From: "iforone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:49:42 -0800 Ivan Teliatnikov wrote: > Hi everyone. > [...] > 2. Is there a command/tool to display status of all services in

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread John Hasler
L.V.Gandhi wrote: > which package has update-rc.d It's in sysv-rc. It's a required package, so you have it. I suggest that you look at the sysvconfig package, though. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 16:14:46 -0800 L.V.Gandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/1/06, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > update-rc.d defaults > > which package has update-rc.d I honestly don't know, its in the minimal system. A > > -- > L.V.Gandhi > http://lvgandhi.tripod

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread L . V . Gandhi
On 3/1/06, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > update-rc.d defaults which package has update-rc.d -- L.V.Gandhi http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/ linux user No.205042

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread Gilberto Villani Brito
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:35:03 +1100 Ivan Teliatnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I am pursing a task of establishing a procedure among my colleagues - > system administrator which will help us enable/disable services on > Debian servers. > > I am considering "update-rc.d" script

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread John Hasler
Ivan Teliatnikov writes: > Is there a command/tool to display status of all services in all > runlevels. I suggest that you install sysvconfig. It will do most or all of what you need. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: update-rc.d questions: best practice?

2006-03-01 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:57:55 +1100 Ivan Teliatnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I am pursing a task of establishing a procedure among my colleagues - > system administrator which will help us enable/disable services on > Debian servers. > > I am considering "update-rc.d" script

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-10 Thread * Tong*
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 03:34:22 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: >> what is the right way to specify a service that only has start but no >> stop? > > station:~# update-rc.d local start 80 2 3 4 5 . > Adding system startup for /etc/init.d/local ... >/etc/rc2.d/S80local -> ../init.d/local >/etc/rc

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
--- * Tong* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is the right way to specify a service that only has start but no > stop? station:~# update-rc.d local start 80 2 3 4 5 . Adding system startup for /etc/init.d/local ... /etc/rc2.d/S80local -> ../init.d/local /etc/rc3.d/S80local -> ../init.d/l

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-09 Thread * Tong*
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 01:25:07 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: >> # update-rc.d local defaults start 80 >> update-rc.d: error: codenumber must be a number between 0 and 99 > > update-rc.d local defaults 80 Come on, Thomas, I notice that you seldom read people's posting closely. What I was asking was:

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-09 Thread Adam Aube
* Tong* wrote: > Q: In RedHat, the chkconfig can also be used to generate a code >skeleton that have start/stop, etc. Can we do it in debian? update-rc.d would be the equivalent tool. > Q: what is the right way to specify a service that >only has start but no stop? Make the script do no

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
--- * Tong* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > # update-rc.d local defaults start 80 > update-rc.d: error: codenumber must be a number between 0 and 99 update-rc.d local defaults 80 -- Thomas Adam = "The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net "TAG Editor" -- http:/

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-09 Thread * Tong*
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:44:07 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: >> % update-rc.d local defaults 80-start >> update-rc.d: error: codenumber must be a number between 0 and 99 >> usage: update-rc.d [-n] [-f] remove >>update-rc.d [-n] defaults [NN | sNN kNN] > > RTFM would help here. You're almost t

Re: update-rc.d usage

2004-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
--- * Tong* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > % update-rc.d local defaults 80-start > update-rc.d: error: codenumber must be a number between 0 and 99 > usage: update-rc.d [-n] [-f] remove >update-rc.d [-n] defaults [NN | sNN kNN] RTFM would help here. You're almost there but you need to s

Re: update-rc.d and package upgrades

2004-06-20 Thread John Hasler
martin f krafft writes: > So what's the recommended way of disabling services? I suggest sysvconfig. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: update-rc.d and package upgrades

2004-06-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, martin f krafft wrote: > The recommended way to disable a service, or to move its > initialisation priority is update-rc.d. However, when the package is update-rc.d is for THE PACKAGING SYSTEM. It is not meant as an admin tool. It could be made smarter, like dpkg-divert, and

Re: update-rc.d

2004-02-25 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello T. Albert (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > what's the equivalence of chkconfig --list in debian using > update-rc.d ? i have difficulties in listing what services are on on > init level 3 for example. thank you. ls -l /etc/rcS.d /etc/rc3.d I don't think update-rc.d can do tha

Re: update-rc.d

2003-11-13 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miguel Alvarez Blanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >As I said in the first message, I do not know how to keep a package >installed in the system and yet be able to de-activate its startup >scripts, sort of like leaving it unconfigured. # cd /etc/init.d # mv script

Re: update-rc.d

2003-11-12 Thread Ernest Johanson
One suggestion here might be to put an exit statement on a line by itself near the beginning of the script, before anything is executed. This will prevent the script from running even though the rc.d links are in place. When you update the package, the install script should detect that the init scr

Re: update-rc.d

2003-11-12 Thread David Z Maze
Miguel Alvarez Blanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > a) if the sysadmin wants to fiddle with the links, he may do so > (presumably by hand?) and the packaging system will not touch them > *provided the sysadmin leaves at least one of the links*. Now, I can > see how to use this to remove all but an

Re: update-rc.d

2003-11-12 Thread Miguel Alvarez Blanco
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: update-rc.d is working as intended. Read its manpage about how you as the local admin should interact with it. In particular, update-rc.d is to be used ONLY by the packaging system, not by the local admin. Thanks for the quick response. However, I am not sure if I

Re: update-rc.d

2003-11-12 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Miguel Alvarez Blanco wrote: > I do not really know if this is a bug or a "feature", so I am not update-rc.d is working as intended. Read its manpage about how you as the local admin should interact with it. In particular, update-rc.d is to be used ONLY by the packaging syst

Re: update-rc.d

2001-11-30 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 30-Nov-2001 Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > We can have update-rc.d -f remove to remove the daemon from > the init script. Why can't we have update-rc.d -l to list > the init levels in which the daemon will be started. > because debian by default does not mess with run levels. Either we are in si

Re: update-rc.d

2001-11-30 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:39:43PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > We can have update-rc.d -f remove to remove the daemon from > the init script. Why can't we have update-rc.d -l to list > the init levels in which the daemon will be started. $ ls -1 /etc/rc?.d/???ssh This gives nice list for ssh. K for

Re: update-rc.d

1999-03-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Mar 27, 1999 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Piotr Legiecki wrote: > Hi > I'v received an answer to my question about managing links in rcx.d > directories, but it wasn't what I was talking about. > The update-rc.d scripts simply removes links AND scripts from init.d > directory and I want only temp

Re: update-rc.d

1999-03-27 Thread shaleh
> > Hi > I'v received an answer to my question about managing links in rcx.d > directories, but it wasn't what I was talking about. > The update-rc.d scripts simply removes links AND scripts from init.d > directory and I want only temporarly disable > running some daemons during system startup (

Re: update-rc.d didn't work...

1997-07-18 Thread Lindsay Allen
On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Mathieu Legrand wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install Debian Linux 1.3.1. I already installed Debian 1.2 > and now I want to do a totally new installation. This new revision has a > really good installation system, but I have two problems: > > - first of all, a ma