Re: update-alternatives and gcc

2003-06-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:20:47PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:24:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Yes, they were very carefully compiled with good old 2.95, until mid-may > > week, when they finally switched over to using 3.2. > > That raises a couple of more general is

Re: update-alternatives and gcc

2003-06-08 Thread Ross Boylan
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:24:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Chris Caldwell wrote: > > Anyone know what the pre-packaged kernel-images are compiled > > with? I haven't used one beyond a base install in years. > > Yes, they were very carefully compiled with good old 2.95, until mid-may > week, when