On 12/12/05, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well if -t vfat gives you the same error, you can try redoing the
> filesystem on the USB drive. I've seen that happen when the device is
> not properly unmounted, or if something bad happened to it (mine was
> dropped... still works, but
On 12/12/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Martin. I mention in my post that I have tried "-t msdos" and it
> doesn't work. "-t vfat" gives the very same error:
>
> Bart:~# mount /dev/autousb /mnt/usb/ -t msdos
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/autous
Martin Lefebvre wrote:
> On 12/9/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't
>> mount it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine.
>>
>
> Try vfat... works with my 2 usbdrives
Thanks, Martin. I mention in my po
On 12/9/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't mount
> it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine.
>
Try vfat... works with my 2 usbdrives
--
Martin Lefebvre
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: https://sigterm.hom
On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 20:03, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 04:36:28PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been trying to get uvfat working and it says that I just need to
> > enable umsdos and vfat (which I have) and they both work fine.
> >
> > However, when I do
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 04:36:28PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been trying to get uvfat working and it says that I just need to
> enable umsdos and vfat (which I have) and they both work fine.
>
> However, when I do
>
> mount -t uvfat /dev/hda11 /mnt
>
> it tells me that uv
on Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 07:10:53AM +0100, Saqib Shaikh ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> hi all,
>
> what i want to do is convert my existing linux partition into an
> umsdos or loopback filesystem to send to a friend. i have done the
> opposite - converted umsdos to ext2, but could someone tell me ho
I've been trying to run UMSDOS as my root partition for the last week or so.
I posted to the debian-user list to see if anyone knew about how to make
this work, but I haven't received a reply yet.
Debian definitely doesn't support UMSDOS as root out of the box. I can get
tantalizingly close to ha
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:33:40PM -0400, R. Chris Ross wrote:
> I have recently gotten a laptop at work that I need to run Win95
> and later, likely NT. It would be great to also load Linux in the same
> partition. Can Debian be installed using an umsdos file system in a fat32
> partition?
Jason Ish said
> I have to install Linux onto a umsdos file system on one of my computers,
> even though I know it isn't a suggested practice.
>
> What steps should I take to install a fresh debian system onto umsdos. I
> have a up and running Debian system to make a new kernel and what not.
>
>
On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 01:27:20PM -0600, Jason Ish wrote:
> I have to install Linux onto a umsdos file system on one of my computers,
> even though I know it isn't a suggested practice.
>
> What steps should I take to install a fresh debian system onto umsdos. I
> have a up and running Debian sy
On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 01:27:20PM -0600, Jason Ish wrote:
> I have to install Linux onto a umsdos file system on one of my computers,
> even though I know it isn't a suggested practice.
>
> What steps should I take to install a fresh debian system onto umsdos. I
> have a up and running Debian sy
On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Jim Foltz wrote:
> Anyway, it uses umsdos. I am using a bastardized version of
> /etc/init.d/boot and have prety much left the filesystem checking as it is
> by default. The umsdos filesystem (root) is mounted and sync'd ok, but the
> df command does not show that /dev/hda1 was
Giuliano Procida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is possible to fool the installation process roughly as follows:
> You need a DOS partition, say /dev/hda1, umssync, and perhaps other
> things (it's been a while). Replace the boot-floppy kernel with one
> that has FAT and UMSDOS compiled in.
Rick Macdonald said:
> I've had /home and my debian mirror and a few other things on a UMSDOS
> filesystem for quite awhile. I just upgraded to 2.0.25 a couple of
> weeks ago. Before that I was running 2.0.6. I never noticed any problems
> compared to 1.2.13 or whatever it was that I used to run.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have gathered that it is possible to run the debian installation
> in a dos fat partition. I am hoping that this configuration would
> resemble the slakware installation running over the dos fat partition.
Do not, repeat DO NOT use UMSDOS filesystems
Take a look at dilinux
ftp.sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/dilinux
It's a very good example of what you want.
On Fri, 6 Dec 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all...
>
> I have gathered that it is possible to run the debian installation
> in a dos fat partitio
17 matches
Mail list logo
