On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:15:52 +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> A user disconnect all disks, but udev didn't remove all symlinks...:
>
> ls -la /dev/disk/by-id/ | grep sdb
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 2010-03-12 21:40
> usb-SAMSUNG_HD642JJ_31AF4D71B000 -> ../../sdb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10
> 2010-03
Hello,
>> But I don't know how will it works, 'cause now all disks have one
>> partition, but partitions are encrypted - can I create a label on
>> existing crypted partition?
>
> I've never tested before, but I'd say yes.
>
>> And can system (or udev) identify that label?
>
> I see not good reaso
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:34:47 +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
>> Yes. This can be achieved with "$env{ID_FS_LABEL}" variable used by
>> "udev" (I've had to search for this :-P):
>>
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Udev
>>
>> That way you can forget about the serial number of the disks being
>> de
hello,
> Yes. This can be achieved with "$env{ID_FS_LABEL}" variable used by
> "udev" (I've had to search for this :-P):
>
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Udev
>
> That way you can forget about the serial number of the disks being
> detected the same as the devices/partitions will be identif
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:55:35 +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> thanks, sorry I think we don't understand each other... I know how can I
> determine labels, I would like to make some elegant way for user
> plug USB disk, and udev catch that event, send an email for me which
> contains serial
> part of
Hello,
>> hmm... how can I "catch" which is the label of the attached disk?
>
>
> "ls -l /dev/disk/by-label" will tell you if there is any current label on
> the filesystems. Look:
>
> s...@stt008:~$ ls -l /dev/disk/by-label
> total 0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 mar 17 07:50 ALFA -> ../../sda2
> l
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:58:03 +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
>>> I would like to use two rules to identify disks when user attach one
>>> of them, but system doesn't sense which disk has attached.
>>
>> Give filesystems a "label" and use that to manage them. As they are
>> external disks for backup it
Hello,
> "Etch" is not longer supported. Maybe upgrading to the latest stable
> should be desiderable :-?
I know, but this is what we have, currently it's not option.
>> System has two USB SATA-II disks for backup. Since a few weeks the
>> system can't make different between disks, all disks has
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:27:56 +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> there is a Debian Etch with kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686, and udev
> 0.105.
"Etch" is not longer supported. Maybe upgrading to the latest stable
should be desiderable :-?
> System has two USB SATA-II disks for backup. Since a few wee
9 matches
Mail list logo
