Siju George wrote:
> Thank you so much Bob :-)
> You are really kind to explain such a lot :-D
Happy to help!
> It is the many Virtual Machines that are taking memory.
> I am going to get a bigger machine that supports svm to ron them.
I am glad that you have identified the issue. Virtual machi
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> Then 'htop' can help you find processes that are consuming memory.
> The default is to sort the display by percent CPU usage. But you can
> change that to display sorted by resident set size. Press F6 and then
> use the cursor keys to chang
Siju George wrote:
> srv1:~# free -m
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem: 3956 3538418 0 0181
> -/+ buffers/cache: 3356600
> Swap: 9538 51 9486
That looks okay. You h
Siju George wrote:
> procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- cpu
...abbreviated...
> r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo in cs us sy id wa
> 0 2 27608 441256520 238372 20 223 1161 1020 3580 13200 1 5 72 22
> 0 1 29076 444256
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> That sounds more like it is swapping now when before it was not. Is
> there now a process running that is consuming more memory? What does
> 'cat /proc/meminfo' say about memory usage? (Although I have gotten
> lazy and rely much upon 'htop
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> as it was instantenous earlier.
>
> That sounds more like it is swapping now when before it was not. Is
> there now a process running that is consuming more memory? What does
> 'cat /proc/meminfo' say about memory usage? (Although I have gott
Siju George put forth on 10/20/2010 7:20 AM:
> Thanks for your replies Bob, Stan and Karl :-)
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> You just installed Squeeze on this system 4 days ago.
> no
Ok, let me rephrase. At the time I typed that, you had replaced your
Linux kern
Thanks for your replies Bob, Stan and Karl :-)
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Siju George put forth on 10/19/2010 7:16 AM:
>
>
> Define "recently".
>
2-3 days back
>
> You just installed Squeeze on this system 4 days ago.
>
no
>Four days isn't
> sufficient to say a
Siju George wrote:
> Michael Iatrou wrote:
> > When you say that it becomes slow, do you have any comparison figures
> > between normal and "slow" operation?
>
> well,
>
> saving after editing crontab -e with less than 10 lines takes 5-8
> seconds where as it was instantenous earlier.
That sound
Siju George put forth on 10/19/2010 7:16 AM:
> Recently Saving/Copying files from Windows Clients to the Samba server
> has become slow at times.
> The system waits during these times for a long time even while
> performing operations using ssh such as
Define "recently". If the system was runnin
Hi
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 17:46 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a squeeze server
>
> Linux rv1 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 15 00:56:30 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> It has a lot of free RAM and the processors also don't have much work load
>
> # free -m
> total
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Michael Iatrou wrote:
>
>
> When you say that it becomes slow, do you have any comparison figures
> between normal and "slow" operation?
>
well,
saving after editing crontab -e with less than 10 lines takes 5-8
seconds where as it was instantenous earlier.
> Sh
When the date was Tuesday 19 of October 2010, Siju George wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Michael Iatrou
wrote:
> > When the date was Tuesday 19 of October 2010, Siju George wrote:
> > > Recently Saving/Copying files from Windows Clients to the Samba
> > > server has become slow at tim
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Michael Iatrou wrote:
>
> When the date was Tuesday 19 of October 2010, Siju George wrote:
>
> > Recently Saving/Copying files from Windows Clients to the Samba server
> > has become slow at times.
> [...]
> > What else can I do to trouble shoot this problem?
>
> T
When the date was Tuesday 19 of October 2010, Siju George wrote:
> Recently Saving/Copying files from Windows Clients to the Samba server
> has become slow at times.
[...]
> What else can I do to trouble shoot this problem?
The first step is to verify that this is not a problem of the Windows
cl
15 matches
Mail list logo
