On 2/21/18, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-21, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 08:57:27 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Not so good. The woof is back in the shop.
>>
>> Woof? The dog?
>
> I think the woof fell in maybe.
Da woof, da woof
Da woof is on da house.
On 2018-02-21, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 08:57:27 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Not so good. The woof is back in the shop.
>
> Woof? The dog?
I think the woof fell in maybe.
--
New York was no mere city. It was instead an infinitely romantic notion, the
mysterious n
Mark Neidorff wrote:
> I respect your opinion, and the many contributions that you have made to
> this list. You and I have both been more than annoyed with bad attitudes,
> you with KDE me with my bank. I pointed out the problem that I had and
> how it has been mishandled, IMO. You mentioned "t
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 08:57:27 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> Not so good. The woof is back in the shop.
Woof? The dog?
On Tuesday 20 February 2018 20:29:07 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:20:46 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 February 2018 09:54:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I wouldn't post any information like that in an unencrypted post /
> > > email.
> >
> > twasn't to
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:20:46 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2018 09:54:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I wouldn't post any information like that in an unencrypted post /
> > email.
>
> twasn't too smart...
And I should have sent that sentence to you privately, and encr
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:07:29 AM EST deloptes wrote:
> Hi,
>
<<>>
> > I am a long time kmail user. I have noticed significant improvment in
> > stability and the filtering of incoming mail. I use the filtering
> > extensively.
> > Before the last release, at the beginning of a KDE sessio
On Tuesday 20 February 2018 09:54:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 09:35:33 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 February 2018 06:08:05 Curt wrote:
> > > On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a
> > >
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 09:35:33 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2018 06:08:05 Curt wrote:
> > On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a phone
> > > call generally resolves the problem, but the threat is there, and
On Tuesday 20 February 2018 06:08:05 Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a phone
> > call generally resolves the problem, but the threat is there, and
> > they know it.
>
> Five digits, huh? Like $102.55?
>
No decimal p
On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a phone call
> generally resolves the problem, but the threat is there, and they know
> it.
Five digits, huh? Like $102.55?
Of course here they don't have those quaint little Mom and Pop local
b
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:52 PM, wrote:
> On Monday, February 19, 2018 3:16:20 PM EST deloptes wrote:
> > Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that were, in
> > > the past, broken, now work again. I've not found anything wrong at
> all.
> >
> >
On Monday 19 February 2018 15:52:37 m...@neidorff.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 19, 2018 3:16:20 PM EST deloptes wrote:
> > Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that
> > > were, in the past, broken, now work again. I've not found
> > > anything wro
On Monday 19 February 2018 15:33:55 Brian wrote:
> On Mon 19 Feb 2018 at 21:16:20 +0100, deloptes wrote:
> > Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that
> > > were, in the past, broken, now work again. I've not found
> > > anything wrong at all.
> >
> >
On Monday, February 19, 2018 3:16:20 PM EST deloptes wrote:
> Brad Rogers wrote:
> > So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that were, in
> > the past, broken, now work again. I've not found anything wrong at all.
>
> yes a friend installed it and showed it to me, so the differ
On Mon 19 Feb 2018 at 21:16:20 +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> > So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that were, in
> > the past, broken, now work again. I've not found anything wrong at all.
> >
>
> yes a friend installed it and showed it to me, so the dif
On Monday 19 February 2018 10:38:57 m...@neidorff.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:02:04 PM EST Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
> > > Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might
> > > simply have to abandon it after all
Brad Rogers wrote:
> So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that were, in
> the past, broken, now work again. I've not found anything wrong at all.
>
yes a friend installed it and showed it to me, so the difference was there.
I also looked at Qt5 and the Sailfish OS project -
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:14:35 +0100
deloptes wrote:
Hello deloptes,
>was thinking recently to have a look at KDE as they released KDE5 (Qt5)
>and it looked promising, but if they have still same attitude to
>release broken
So far, my experience with KDE/QT5 has been good; Things that were, in
t
m...@neidorff.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:02:04 PM EST Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
>> > Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply
>> > have to abandon it after all these years.
>>
>> Then look at TDE, i
On Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:02:04 PM EST Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
> > Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply
> > have to abandon it after all these years.
>
> Then look at TDE, its kde forked at about the 3.5 po
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Then look at TDE, its kde forked at about the 3.5 point, with kajillions
> of bugs fixed. I'm running it here, works perfect.
+1
On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
> Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply
> have to abandon it after all these years.
>
Then look at TDE, its kde forked at about the 3.5 point, with kajillions
of bugs fixed. I'm running it here, works perfect.
Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply have
to abandon it after all these years.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018, 11:42 PM wrote:
> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 3:59:53 PM EST ernst doubt wrote:
> > I sent a similar message to debian-kde this morning, but it appears
> ther
On Saturday, February 17, 2018 3:59:53 PM EST ernst doubt wrote:
> I sent a similar message to debian-kde this morning, but it appears there's
> not much activity there, so I figured I'd also try here.
>
> I've been a debian GNU/linux user (I like KDE for my desktop, though I
> generally keep open
25 matches
Mail list logo
