Re: tntnet

2013-08-02 Thread ChadDavis
> > > > Unless you've already removed it, you can still check the configuration > file, find the files/apps it was serving, and get a good guess at the > contents, enough to decide whether you want to start the server back up to > look. Or whether you might want to take other measures to make sure

Re: tntnet

2013-08-01 Thread Joel Rees
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:08 AM, ChadDavis wrote: > > >> And synaptic knowing about tntnet was somewhat reassuring, because it >> does indicate a high probability that it was installed by someone with >> admin-level priviledges. Bad if it wasn't you, of course, but not bad if >> you're sure no one

Re: tntnet

2013-08-01 Thread ChadDavis
> And synaptic knowing about tntnet was somewhat reassuring, because it does > indicate a high probability that it was installed by someone with > admin-level priviledges. Bad if it wasn't you, of course, but not bad if > you're sure no one not you has been logging in as you. > > Did you check what

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:04:59PM CEST, ChadDavis said: > > It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, > > but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch > > it. > > > > Nothing to worry about. > > > > So, there's no connection between chrome and

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Joel Rees
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:04 AM, ChadDavis wrote: > > It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, > > but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch > > it. > > > > Nothing to worry about. > > > > So, there's no connection between chrome and tntnet, i

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Brian
On Wed 31 Jul 2013 at 17:51:28 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Brian wrote: > > >Rough and ready, but effective: > > > > apt-cache -s purge tntnet > > i assume you mean > >apt-get -s purge tntnet > > which purges nothing, but displays what would happen if

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread davidson
hi brian. On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Brian wrote: On Tue 30 Jul 2013 at 14:55:41 -0600, ChadDavis wrote: I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up in the first place. I didn't install it, unless by accident

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Sharon Kimble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:04:59 -0600 ChadDavis wrote: > > It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, > > but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't > > touch it. > > > > Nothing to worry about. > > > > S

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread ChadDavis
> It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable, > but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch > it. > > Nothing to worry about. > So, there's no connection between chrome and tntnet, it's just pointing out that "while I'm doing stuff, there's this ot

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:55:48PM CEST, ChadDavis said: > When I try to remove it via synaptic, it reports that, in addition to > the tntnet packages, another "unchanged" package will be "held back > and not upgraded" . . . that other package is google-chrome-stable. > > I couldn't quite figure

Re: tntnet

2013-07-31 Thread ChadDavis
When I try to remove it via synaptic, it reports that, in addition to the tntnet packages, another "unchanged" package will be "held back and not upgraded" . . . that other package is google-chrome-stable. I couldn't quite figure out why it's there though. It's not listed as a dependencie of that

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Brian
On Tue 30 Jul 2013 at 14:55:41 -0600, ChadDavis wrote: > I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. > > I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up > in the first place. I didn't install it, unless by accident. How > might I determine if something e

Fwd: Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Wayne Topa
Your right. I have spent the afternoon trying to find a bug on my Wheezy system sence it was installed.. The bug, which I just found, was in a new apt.conf file. When I commented the file my alias's in .bashrc are working again. Neither aptitude or apt-cache reported an error or the presence of

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Joel Rees
Hmm. Guerilla marketing? Wish I had time to check it out. Looks kinda fun. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:55 AM, ChadDavis wrote: > I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. > > I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up > in the first place. I didn't

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Brad Alexander
It could be tntnet: # apt-cache search tntnet tntnet - modular, multithreaded web application server for C++ Having said that, while I am not a developer, I have never run tntnet on any of my boxes. --b On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Wayne Topa wrote: > On 07/30/2013 04:55 PM, ChadDavis wr

Re: tntnet

2013-07-30 Thread Wayne Topa
On 07/30/2013 04:55 PM, ChadDavis wrote: > I've noticed the tntnet is running on my box. I'm on wheezy. > > I'd like to turn it off, at the least. But I wonder why it's fired up > in the first place. I didn't install it, unless by accident. How > might I determine if something else is using it