Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:18:02 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > > > > > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but

Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > > > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed > > > > Command: > > > > $ s

Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:24:00PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed > > Command: > > $ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin \ te

Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed > > Command: > > $ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin tetex-extra >

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

H.S. wrote: > > Same here. From all the texlive packages that are to be intall, there at > least a few tetex package still, e.g. tetex-bin tetex-extra. > > These packages I would expect to be purged by aptitude automatically (by > reporting they are no longer used) some time "soon". > > ->HS >

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

David Fox wrote: > > > On 06 Jul 2007 17:13:19 GMT, *Tyler Smith* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > If you search the list you'll find several threads about people > switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless. > > > Kind of. But my las

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

On 06 Jul 2007 17:13:19 GMT, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you search the list you'll find several threads about people switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless. Kind of. But my last dist-upgrade involved grabbing a whole slew of texlive packages, and in p

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

On 2007-07-07, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 6, 12:40 pm, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Presumably, >> if you just let apt handle all the upgrades you will probably find >> that you no longer have tetex by the time Etch goes stable, and all >> packages have bee

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

On Jul 6, 12:40 pm, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Presumably, > if you just let apt handle all the upgrades you will probably find > that you no longer have tetex by the time Etch goes stable, and all > packages have been replaced by texlive. Or something like that. > Is this a typo? E

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

Tyler Smith wrote: On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]: Tyler Smith wrote: On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you search the list you'll find several threads about people switching from tetex to texlive now, which

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]: >> Tyler Smith wrote: >> > On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > If you search the list you'll find several threads about people >> > switching from tetex to texlive now, which

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

Russell L. Harris wrote: > * H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]: >> Tyler Smith wrote: >>> On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If you search the list you'll find several threads about people >>> switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless. >> Thanks for the

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

* H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]: > Tyler Smith wrote: > > On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you search the list you'll find several threads about people > > switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless. > > Thanks for the explanation. I will pro

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

Tyler Smith wrote: > On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you search the list you'll find several threads about people > switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless. > > Tyler Thanks for the explanation. I will probably wait and let things settle on their

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

H.S. wrote: > > Hello, > > Since a couple of days, if I upgrade my Debian Testing machine, I see > that a whole bunch of texlive* packages are to be installed, many of > them new and a few hundreds of additional disk space is to be used. Are > there any changes going on in Latex packages in Test

Re: tetex and texlive: changes in Debian?

On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any changes going on in Latex packages in Testing these > days? Do I need both tetex and texlive packages? And, finally, > what's the relation between these two kind of packages? Tetex is not longer maintained upstream, so Debian, and eve

Re: tetex to live tex

On Jul 4, 2:40 pm, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BartlebyScrivener wrote: Thank you. I'm running Etch. rd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tetex to live tex

BartlebyScrivener wrote: > I've seen a few threads where some folks have had trouble installing > live tex. > > What is the current status of this under Etch? Etch is stable. So packages under it does not change except for security upgrade. So there is no question of this transition under Etch.

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 2007-05-08, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07 May 2007 23:35:59 GMT > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What I found, thanks to help from others here (Florian I think it >> was...) was that the directory structure under ~/texmf has to mirror >> that of /usr/share/texmf-

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 07 May 2007 23:35:59 GMT Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > >> (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into

Re: TeTex to TeXLive [DONE]

Micha Feigin wrote: > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? > > > > I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > > (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib,

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 2007-05-07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files >> (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into the right directories > > If you have non-standard files you should put them

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

* Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070507 13:49]: > ... its time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since > it actually updates, but I've also heard tell that people experience > big problems when moving over from TeTeX instead of just installing > TeXLive onto a system without any f

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 07 May 2007 19:22:40 GMT Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? > > I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 07 May 2007 19:22:40 GMT Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? > > I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into the right directories (another thread on this list in the last mo

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 15:06:50 -0400, Michael Marsh wrote: > On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 >> Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've >> > had to remove some TeX component

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On Mon, 7 May 2007 15:06:50 -0400 "Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 > > Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've > > > had to remov

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've > had to remove some TeX component or other because it now > won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that m

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've > had to remove some TeX component or other because it now > won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's > time to get with the progr

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

* KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070425 15:42]: > > While the installation of texlive went fine with my Sid box, it did take > quite a lot of space doing that upgrade. It ended up using more than > 500MB in my /usr partition. Did anyone notice that? In my installation of etch, /usr/share/texmf-texlive o

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Russell L. Harris wrote: >> Johannes Wiedersich escribió: >>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install >>> texlive'? > > Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you > must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing > TeXLive.

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

On 2007-04-15, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Johannes Wiedersich escribió: >>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install >>> texlive'? > > Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you > must purge all the teTeX configuration fi

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

> Johannes Wiedersich escribió: >> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install >> texlive'? Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing TeXLive. I failed to do so, and ended up re

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johannes Wiedersich escribió: > I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to > TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a > happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when >

Re: tetex fail to install

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ivan Glushkov escribió: > So, any idea what can be wrong? Yes, tetex does not longer exists. Try tex live ;-) Regards, Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve http://debian.

Re: tetex fail to install

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jens Kubieziel wrote: > 2007/4/12, Ivan Glushkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in: >> /tmp/tetex.updmap.SzH23920 > > What is the output of: > ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ bsr-interpolated.map

Re: tetex fail to install

2007/4/12, Ivan Glushkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in: /tmp/tetex.updmap.SzH23920 What is the output of: ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ dpkg -S dvips35.map kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map kpsewhich --show-path=map grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Johannes Wiedersich wrote the following on 11.04.2007 19:49: > Thilo Six wrote: >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html > > From there, I get: > < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live > < 2007 to unstable. > > Does

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

* Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070411 12:42]: > I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to > TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I have been using teTeX under Etch to generate a variety of complicated documents, together with h

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:49 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Thilo Six wrote: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html > > From there, I get: > < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live > < 2007 to unstable. > >

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Thilo Six wrote: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html From there, I get: < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live < 2007 to unstable. Doesn't concern etch. Having both available on etch, when should *I* upgrade?

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

On 4/11/07, Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when is the best time to m

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Johannes Wiedersich wrote the following on 11.04.2007 19:37: > I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to > TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a > happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when > is the best ti

Re: teTeX config file updmap.cfg not found

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:21:26AM +0200, Sed Nivo wrote: > Hello all, > > I have installed teTeX 3.0 > > I run command "texconfig init", and after it computer say; > > updmap: config file updmap.cfg not found. > > Had any such problem? Have you installed all the tetex packages? i.e. tex-c

Re: TeTeX 3 in experimental

Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Frank Küster (one of the main tetex developers for Debian) has put >> backported versions of the tetex 3 packages for sarge. See: >> >> http://people.debian.org/~frank/teTeX-3.0/ > > How does this integrate with the rest of the debian-sarge system?

Re: TeTeX 3 in experimental

On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 04:49:24PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: > Hi, Jim. > > On Oct 21 2005, Jim McCloskey wrote: > > Is anyone using the TeTeX 3 packages in experimental? How functional > > are they? > > The packages are quite good, but teTeX 3 has just been uploaded to > unstable, after being

Re: TeTeX 3 in experimental

Hi, Jim. On Oct 21 2005, Jim McCloskey wrote: > Is anyone using the TeTeX 3 packages in experimental? How functional > are they? The packages are quite good, but teTeX 3 has just been uploaded to unstable, after being available in experimental for some time. I have used those packages when they

Re: tetex-bin fails installation

On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 12:00:24AM -0600, Art Edwards wrote: > On my last upgrade, tetex-bin failed to install. I received the > following in the debconf window: Disclaimer: I am not maintaining this package> Please check and see it has been reported or not. http://bugs.debian.org/tetex-bin If

Re: Tetex problem: twocolumn is not working properly

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:23:38PM -0400, Alan Davis wrote: > Something is not working properly on this installation of TeX/LaTeX. At home, I > wrote an exam, emailing it to work. At work, using TeTeX, the formatting of the two > column mode is not working: both columns of the test (I use examd

Re: tetex-bin 2.0.2-14 problems AGAIN

On Wednesday 26 May 2004 07:40, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 25 May 2004, Joris Huizer wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >It has become a serious problem! > > >After the message here attached I completely uninstalled all the tetex > > >packages > > >& the tex connected ones (lyx, texmacs, etc

Re: tetex-bin 2.0.2-14 problems AGAIN

On 25 May 2004, Joris Huizer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >It has become a serious problem! > >After the message here attached I completely uninstalled all the tetex > >packages > >& the tex connected ones (lyx, texmacs, etc.) by means of "apt-get remove > >--purge pasckage"; then - to be o

Re: tetex-bin 2.0.2-14 problems AGAIN

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has become a serious problem! After the message here attached I completely uninstalled all the tetex packages & the tex connected ones (lyx, texmacs, etc.) by means of "apt-get remove --purge pasckage"; then - to be on the safe side - I removed by hand the /etc/texmf & /

Re: tetex-bin 2.0.2-14 problems

On 22 May 2004, Vittorio wrote: > > Under debian testing I'm updating & upgrading the system by means of apt-get. > > > Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-14) ... > Regenerating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... done > Running initex. This may take some time. ... > Error: `etex -ini  -jobname=etex -progname=ete

Re: tetex-extra will not install in sarge - PARTLY SOLVED

On 01 Apr 2004, CW Harris wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:28:12PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > On 01 Apr 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > Has anyone had problems installing tetex-extra in Sarge? > > > > > > I've tried repeatedly but it keeps failing to install certain fonts and > > > t

Re: tetex-extra will not install in sarge - PARTLY SOLVED

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:28:12PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 01 Apr 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > Has anyone had problems installing tetex-extra in Sarge? > > > > I've tried repeatedly but it keeps failing to install certain fonts and > > then remaining half-installed. I can't see an

Re: tetex-extra will not install in sarge - PARTLY SOLVED

On 01 Apr 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote: > Has anyone had problems installing tetex-extra in Sarge? > > I've tried repeatedly but it keeps failing to install certain fonts and > then remaining half-installed. I can't see anything in the bug reports > similar to this. > > Anthony > >From the logs

Re: tetex on unstable: dvips (5.92b) -Ppdf problem

>I think that he is using -Ppdf to make sure that the pdf > text is readable on the screen. I believe that this > option has some bearing on the way the fonts are > handled. And then he makes the program vomit the > output into the file with -o. Yes, -Ppdf is supposed to get dvips to use fonts s

Re: tetex on unstable: dvips (5.92b) -Ppdf problem

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:40:02 +0900 Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > * Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031014 10:50]: > > Hi, > > I am using unstable with dvips 5.92b. When I try: > > > > dvips -Ppdf process.dvi -o process.ps > > I might be missing something but doesn't the -P

Re: tetex on unstable: dvips (5.92b) -Ppdf problem

Hi Mark, * Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031014 10:50]: > Hi, > I am using unstable with dvips 5.92b. When I try: > > dvips -Ppdf process.dvi -o process.ps I might be missing something but doesn't the -P flag specify a printer and -o specifies an output file? Surely you only want one or the other.

Re: teTeX missing config.ps

> "Ionel" == Ionel Mugurel Ciobica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ionel> Hi, I run woody on a 2.4.18 kernel. Ionel> I update some teTeX stuff and I got some errors, about a missing Ionel> config.ps file. I locate the file and I made a link: Ionel> ln -s /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ps /usr/share/tex

Re: teTeX missing config.ps

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:32:59PM +0200, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote: > I run woody on a 2.4.18 kernel. > > I update some teTeX stuff and I got some errors, about a missing > config.ps file. I locate the file and I made a link: > > ln -s /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ps /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/

Re: teTeX: cannot setup

On 07/01/02, Alec ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2002 08:35 am, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > > ncurses screen entitled 'teTeX setup utility', which says > > "Could not find app-default file for xdvi" > > and exits. > > If purging and reinstalling tetex-bin doesn't fix the proble

Re: teTeX: cannot setup

On Monday 07 January 2002 08:35 am, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > I get to an > ncurses screen entitled 'teTeX setup utility', which says > > "Could not find app-default file for xdvi" > > and exits. If purging and reinstalling tetex-bin doesn't fix the problem, and no one here helps you,

Re: teTeX path question

On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Damian Menscher wrote: > I just upgraded my version of teTeX to 1.0.6, and discovered it no > longer seems to follow the TEXINPUTS environment variable to find > various style files, etc. I need to get this to read in a revtex.cls > file that I've added in, but don't know how

Re: tetex slink -> potato

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paul tanner) writes: > > After the upgrade I can't use the extra > stuff that I had in > /usr/local/lib/texmf. After examining a > copy of my old slink installation I > found the ``local'' link in texmf/ and > in /usr/share/texmf I added: > ln -s /usr/local/share/texmf local >

Re: tetex slink -> potato

On 22 Aug 2000, paul tanner wrote: > After the upgrade I can't use the extra > stuff that I had in > /usr/local/lib/texmf. After examining a > copy of my old slink installation I > found the ``local'' link in texmf/ and > in /usr/share/texmf I added: > ln -s /usr/local/share/texmf local > and moved

Re: tetex-extra problem

Gilbert Laycock writes: > > I've upgraded 10 or so machines over the past couple of months, all > with tetex-extra. I got exactly this error on about 2 of them; the > upgrade worked OK on the others. > > /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/frhyph.tex > is missing on the machines where the

Re: tetex-extra problem

Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christiaan Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I upgraded to potato and almost everything went smoothly, but I have a > > problem with tetex-extra. It gives the following error at configuring > > > > Setting up tetex-extra (1.0-10) ... > > te

Re: tetex-extra problem

Christiaan Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello everyone, > > I upgraded to potato and almost everything went smoothly, but I have a > problem with tetex-extra. It gives the following error at configuring > > Setting up tetex-extra (1.0-10) ... > texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... >

Re: teTeX

On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 09:28:18PM +0100, Hans Gubitz wrote: > While calculating new pk-files I get the message: > /usr/lib/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/spool/texmf/ls-R unwritable. This is not a problem: the ls-R files are not word writeable to fix some security problems. They should be updated in

Re: tetex-nonfree -- Potato -- foils.cls is gone?

Hi, Thanks for you comment, I reported a bug. Sasha. > Alexander Kushnirenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I used to prepare transparencies with foils.cls. Apparently it's gone from > > potato release of tetex-nonfree. It worked fine on my slink computer. > > > > Should I

Re: tetex-nonfree -- Potato -- foils.cls is gone?

Alexander Kushnirenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I used to prepare transparencies with foils.cls. Apparently it's gone from > potato release of tetex-nonfree. It worked fine on my slink computer. > > Should I report a bug or am I missing something? I can´t find anything in the cha

Re: teTeX and DWWW

On 25 Aug 1999 14:35:49 +0200, you wrote: >Does > >http://torres.gf1.internal/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/mnt/main8/usr/doc/texmf/tetex/teTeX-FAQ.gz > >work? Yes. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber | " Ques

Re: teTeX and DWWW

Marc Haber wrote: > When I use DWWW to access the teTeX-Documentation, I can get through > fine to > http://torres.gf1.internal/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/mnt/main8/usr/doc > /texmf > while torres.gf1.internal is my Debian box. However, none of the links > on that page work (Example: > http

Re: teTeX and DWWW

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc Haber) writes: > Hi! > > When I use DWWW to access the teTeX-Documentation, I can get through > fine to > http://torres.gf1.internal/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/mnt/main8/usr/doc/texmf > while torres.gf1.internal is my Debian box. However, none of the links > on that

Re: tetex weirdness

On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote: > On Sat, Jun 05, 1999 at 02:23:13PM -0500, Joseph Chung wrote: > > I use TeX primarily for lilypond music typesetting. Ever since the upgrade > > from hamm to slink, I've been frustrated with tetex. Does creating the ls-R > > database really need to ta

Re: tetex weirdness

On Sat, Jun 05, 1999 at 02:23:13PM -0500, Joseph Chung wrote: > I use TeX primarily for lilypond music typesetting. Ever since the upgrade > from hamm to slink, I've been frustrated with tetex. Does creating the ls-R > database really need to take 30 minutes on a K6-2/333? Does xdvi really need > t

Re: tetex weirdness

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >I use TeX primarily for lilypond music typesetting. Ever since the upgrade >from hamm to slink, I've been frustrated with tetex. Does creating the ls-R >database really need to take 30 minutes on a K6-2/333? Does xdvi really need >to take 15 minutes to pop

Re: TeTeX and language.dat

On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 02:54:02PM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote: > I'm russifing my tetex, and have a problem. When i change language.dat, >and then run in texconfig rehash and hyphen, i t doesn't add russian >hyphenation pattern in babel. Can you help, guys? > > What do you use? T2?

Re: TeTeX and language.dat

Hi! I'm russifing my tetex, and have a problem. When i change language.dat, and then run in texconfig rehash and hyphen, i t doesn't add russian hyphenation pattern in babel. Can you help, guys? What do you use? T2? OK

Re: TeTeX and timing package

Thanks Gary! TFMFONTS had "." in the path, so after copying the .tfm, .mf, and .pk files to my working directory everything started working. I'll try to figure out a better place to put the files after I learn a little more. On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 05:22:46PM -0600, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > [EMA

Re: TeTeX and timing package

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes: | Hi, | | I'm trying to use a package for drawing timing diagrams I downloaded from | CTAN. I'm pretty new to TeX and haven't figured out all the programs yet. | Specifically I don't where to place all the files in the package. I put them | in a local direc

Re: tetex installation bug

> "GM" == Gergely Madarasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GM> On 20 May 1998, Thomas Vaughan wrote: >> No, that doesn't solve the problem, which has something to do >> with an environment variable, TEXMFMAIN. Apparently there is a >> bug somewhere that causes TEXMFMAIN to be unset when it sh

Re: tetex installation bug (way around)

On 20-May-98 Thomas Vaughan wrote: >: $ dpkg --configure tetex-base tetex-bin >: Setting up tetex-base (0.9-6) ... >: /usr/bin/texconfig: No $TEXMFMAIN; set the environment variable or in >: texmf.cnf. > No, that doesn't solve the problem, which has something to do with an > environment variable,

Re: tetex installation bug

On 20 May 1998, Thomas Vaughan wrote: > > No, that doesn't solve the problem, which has something to do with an > environment variable, TEXMFMAIN. Apparently there is a bug somewhere > that causes TEXMFMAIN to be unset when it should be set. I don't > really know where to look, though. Everyt

Re: tetex installation bug

> "MCV" == M C Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MCV> Thomas, You need to configure tetex-bin and -base at the same MCV> time - MCV> dpkg --configure tetex-base tetex-bin : $ dpkg --configure tetex-base tetex-bin : Setting up tetex-base (0.9-6) ... : /usr/bin/texconfig: No $TEXMFMAIN; se

Re: tetex installation bug

Thomas, You need to configure tetex-bin and -base at the same time - dpkg --configure tetex-base tetex-bin HTH, Matthew > > I just this morning updated my hamm system with dselect but found the > following problem: > > : Setting up tetex-base (0.9-6) ... > : Installing new version

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

On Wed, 20 May 1998, Matt Thompson wrote: : > > OK, multi-part question. : > > : > > 1.) Just upgraded my hamm dist., got this: : > > : > > Errors were encountered while processing: : > > tetex-base : > > tetex-nonfree : > > tetex-bin : > > tetex-extra : > > : > > ??? : > First install tet

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

> 1.) Just upgraded my hamm dist., got this: You need to configure tetex-bin and tetex-base at the same time - dpkg --configure tetex-bin tetex-base > 2.) What the heck *is* TeX anyway, and are there applications that > call/use it regularly? Because I have never invoked it for any purpose

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

On 20-May-98 Matt Thompson wrote: >> First install tetex-base (you should install dpkg-perl before) and after >> that install the rest of the files. So, you have to install tetex >> packages in a 2 (or 3) step process: (dpkg-perl,) tetex-base and finally >> the rest of the tetex .deb files. > >

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

On Wed, 20 May 1998, Matt Thompson wrote: > > For LaTeX you need TeX. > > ...and so what's LaTeX? > > Matt TeX is a very powerful text processing system that produces beautifully formatted parers (books, letters etc). It can handle mathematics very well, and a lot of books are written that way.

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

> > OK, multi-part question. > > > > 1.) Just upgraded my hamm dist., got this: > > > > Errors were encountered while processing: > > tetex-base > > tetex-nonfree > > tetex-bin > > tetex-extra > > > > ??? > First install tetex-base (you should install dpkg-perl before) and after > that inst

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

Matt Thompson wrote: > > OK, multi-part question. > > 1.) Just upgraded my hamm dist., got this: > > running dpkg --pending --configure ... > Setting up tetex-base (0.9-6) ... > /usr/bin/texconfig: No $TEXMFMAIN; set the environment variable or in > texmf.cnf. > dpkg: error processing tetex-bas

Re: TeTex upgrade problems

On Tue, 19 May 1998, Matt Thompson wrote: > OK, multi-part question. > > 1.) Just upgraded my hamm dist., got this: > > > ??? Looks like it didn't work. I have no idea > 2.) What the heck *is* TeX anyway, and are there applications that > call/use it regularly? Because I have never invoke

Re: tetex in frozen--Problem?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Art Lemasters) writes: > > I am using dselect ftp to try to download and install > tetex packages. tetex-bin_0.9-3.deb says it needs > tetex-base_0.9-3.deb in order to work, but > tetex-base_0.4pl8-7.deb is all that is available. The > download directory I am using is: >

Re: tetex question

"G. Kapetanios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My question is more tex oriented but involves knowledge of tetex. Tha is > why I am asking the list. The book documentclass creates page headers with > the title of the chapter. However, if the title is long the whole thing is > meesed up. Is there a w

RE: tetex question

The "fancyheadings" package (sometimes called fancyhdr) is probably what you want. Try "\usepackage {fancyhdr}" to see if you have it. My system has support for it in emacs via auctex. There is a manual in .dvi on the system for fancyhdr (fancyhdr.dvi.gz). jim -- From: G. Kapetanios[

Re: teTeX and \noindent

Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The teTeX version I have (re)installed is 0.4. The latest versions just out of hamm that I have are: % dpkg -l 'tetex*' ii tetex-base 0.4pl8-7 teTeX library files ii tetex-bin 0.4pl8-4 teTeX binary files ii tetex-dev 0.4pl8-4

Re: teTeX packages

Hi! > I can't seem to get Debian's teTeX to work at all ("can't find default > format file" from tex). But when I downloaded it direct from sunsite, > it worked fine. Has anyone had a similar experience? I suppose I > could include more (or any, actually) details if requested. I had th

  1   2   >