Hugo Vanwoerkom schrieb:
Hi,
Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
Hugo
I use it with the gscan2pdf frontend and it works perfectly (at least
for documents in german language)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On 28 Dec 2008, andmalc wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:10 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> > Yes, tesseract does work well. Here, xsane gives depth 24, but conversion
> > to depth 8 is neither possible nor necessary. Following the docs, I did
>
> The
On Dec 28, 5:10 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
[snip]
> Yes, tesseract does work well. Here, xsane gives depth 24, but conversion
> to depth 8 is neither possible nor necessary. Following the docs, I did
There is an option at the top of the Preferences/Fil
On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
>
> Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
>
> I tried it out:
>
> 1. apt-get install tesseract-ocr
> 2. apt-get install tesseract-ocr-eng
> 3. use xsane to scan a page at dpi 300
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2008/12/21 Hugo Vanwoerkom :
>> [3] don't scan at less than 300 dpi
>
> And don't scan above 600 DPI!
>
> I forget which OCR I played with a few years ago, but 300 and 600 DPI
> yielded satisfactory results. 1200 DPI made things _worse_ not bet
2008/12/21 Hugo Vanwoerkom :
> [3] don't scan at less than 300 dpi
And don't scan above 600 DPI!
I forget which OCR I played with a few years ago, but 300 and 600 DPI
yielded satisfactory results. 1200 DPI made things _worse_ not better,
possibly because of noise. This was on Fedora, so maybe it
6 matches
Mail list logo
