Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:30:03 PM UTC-4, Chris Davies wrote:
>> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> > What I recall of the PuTTY FAQ (a specific pointer would help) is that
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html
> that's not what I meant by "specific".
A mi
On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:30:03 PM UTC-4, Chris Davies wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > What I recall of the PuTTY FAQ (a specific pointer would help) is that
>
> > it's roughly comparable to rxvt
>
>
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html
that's not what I meant
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> What I recall of the PuTTY FAQ (a specific pointer would help) is that
> it's roughly comparable to rxvt
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Sunday, April 28, 2013 11:30:01 AM UTC-4, Chris Davies wrote:
> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> > I know that most terminal emulators support most VT100 escape
> > sequences, which are based on ecma-48
>
>
>
> I'd extend that to suggest that most terminal emulators support the
> ma
Le Dim 28 avril 2013 17:59, Roger Leigh a écrit :
> The standard is not intended to be
> implemented in its entirety from my reading of it
We have the same document :)
But it says that to be compliant (it says exactly that it would be a
"limited conformance"), one must say which parts of it are im
Le Dim 28 avril 2013 16:45, Chris Davies a écrit :
> lxterm supports blink. PuTTY (on [at least] Windows) also supports blink
> -
> just not by default.
>
> tput blink; echo hello; tput sgr0 hello <- this flashes in
> lxterm
>
Thanks, I will try this one.
>> So, I would like to kno
Roger Leigh writes:
> One thing which has puzzled me for some time is why xterm, and all the
> other terminal emulators, including the Linux console, chose the VT100
> to emulate.
To support commercial software that had VT100 escape sequences hard coded.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 02:36:47AM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I know that most terminal emulators support most VT100 escape
> sequences, which are based on ecma-48, but as far as I know, they
> are not able to support the full standard. By example, they only
> support 7 bit seque
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I know that most terminal emulators support most VT100 escape
> sequences, which are based on ecma-48
I'd extend that to suggest that most terminal emulators support the
majority of VT220 sequences, not just the VT100 subset.
> but as far as I know, they ar
9 matches
Mail list logo
