Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-30 Thread Kevin Buhr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If I run telnet localhost 22 then I have to wait 15-30 seconds before it > connects; with telnet 127.0.0.1 22 it connects at once. I have the same > results using other open ports. Does telnet -4 localhost give the same delay? If not, then the problem is IP

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-26 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Shyamal Prasad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030816 13:59]: > "Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Rupert> Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Rupert> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-18 Thread Rupert Levene
Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RUPERT LEVENE wrote: >> Indeed. Netcat and galeon appear to do the right thing too, while >> telnet, lynx and links all suffer from a delay. (I first noticed >> the problem using lynx). My guess at the moment is that the >> combination of a slow machine

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-18 Thread Mental Patient
RUPERT LEVENE wrote: Indeed. Netcat and galeon appear to do the right thing too, while telnet, lynx and links all suffer from a delay. (I first noticed the problem using lynx). My guess at the moment is that the combination of a slow machine and a slow nameserver is exposing an odd bug in these pr

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-16 Thread RUPERT LEVENE
Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rupert> Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rupert> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Sat,

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-16 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rupert> Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rupert> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 12:25:16AM +0100, >> >> [EMAIL P

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-16 Thread RUPERT LEVENE
Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rupert> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 12:25:16AM +0100, > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Running strace telnet localhost 22 shows that

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-16 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Rupert" == RUPERT LEVENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rupert> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 12:25:16AM +0100, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Running strace telnet localhost 22 shows that it's trying to >>> resolve the hostname localho

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-16 Thread RUPERT LEVENE
Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 12:25:16AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If I run telnet localhost 22 then I have to wait 15-30 seconds >> before it connects; with telnet 127.0.0.1 22 it connects at once. I >> have the same results using other open ports. >>

Re: telnet localhost slow, telnet 127.0.0.1 ok

2003-08-15 Thread Antony Gelberg
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 12:25:16AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If I run telnet localhost 22 then I have to wait 15-30 seconds before it > connects; with telnet 127.0.0.1 22 it connects at once. I have the same > results using other open ports. > > Running strace telnet localhost 22 shows tha