:: Neil Booth writes:
> FWIW I have exactly the same problem. Just started recently. I have
> a dial-up connection too. The problem only exists when I'm not
> connected to the internet. As soon as pppd is up, the problem
> vanishes, and it reappears when I disconnect.
> I haven't a clue eithe
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:-
> socrates tmp$ telnet localhost 80
> telnet: could not resolve localhost/80: Temporary failure in name resolution
FWIW I have exactly the same problem. Just started recently. I have
a dial-up connection too. The problem only exists when I'm not
connected to the i
:: Kai Weber writes:
> I have the same problem. I do not know what is exactly the reason for,
> but I remember it worked some versions and on potato before.
> I tried something on /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/host.conf but with no
> effect.
> There is no network traffic if I try to telnet or ssh w
+ Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Telnet complains about a "Temporary failure in name resolution"
>
> Anything else I could try?
> Any other woody users having the same problem?
I have the same problem. I do not know what is exactly the reason for,
but I remember it worked some versio
> :: Michael P Soulier writes:
>
> > I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these
> > commands:
>
> > #! /bin/sh
> > ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> > route add -net 127.0.0.0
>
> Hm, I did
>
> socrates:/home/jeronimo# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> socrates:/home/jeronimo# route add
> > I remember having had a similar problema (long time ago), and since
> > then I always give a local address to ``mybox.mynet'', which is
> > different from 127.0.0.1
>
> What do you mean? How did you do that? (Or, where can I find some more
> info about it?)
127.0.0.1 localhost
1
:: Christoph Simon writes:
>> > Hello...
>> >
>> > This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
>> > and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
>> > resolve "localhost".
> Do you have an alias for localhost, something like
> 127.0.0.1 localh
:: Michael P Soulier writes:
> I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these commands:
> #! /bin/sh
> ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> route add -net 127.0.0.0
Hm, I did
socrates:/home/jeronimo# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
socrates:/home/jeronimo# route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 03:20:47AM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > iface lo inet loopback
>
> It was commented out, I enebled it, and still that didn't work.
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.
> > Hello...
> >
> > This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
> > and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
> > resolve "localhost".
> >
>
>
> >
> > I am a bit confused. man 5 hosts didn't help...
> >
> > Any ideas?
Do you have an al
On 23-Oct-2000 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
>
> It was commented out, I enebled it, and still that didn't work.
>
> "lo" was already up before this. Telnet complains about a "Temporary
> failure in name resolution"
>
> Anything else I could try?
> Any other woody users having the same problem?
I
:: Wayne Topa writes:
Thanks for replying, Wayne.
>> This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
>> and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
>> resolve "localhost".
> Just tried to telnet to localhost and it works fine (potato).
Oh, I'm using woody
Subject: telnet doesn't find localhost
Date: Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 10:45:11PM -0200
In reply to:Jeronimo Pellegrini
Quoting Jeronimo Pellegrini([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Hello...
>
> This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
> and tehre was a bug filed
13 matches
Mail list logo
