On Thu 1 Dec 2022, at 21:13, David Wright wrote:
[...]
> I think we're in agreement that everything is /defined/ in this
> set of RFCs ...
Yes.
> As for lengthy explanations, I think you have to
> bear in mind that the earlier RFCs often introduced concepts and
> material that were quite new at
On Wed 30 Nov 2022 at 23:02:16 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Tue 29 Nov 2022, at 16:52, David Wright wrote:
> > Yes, but my post responded to, and only concerned, what lies between
> > the end of the body area and the next boundary marker, whereas your
> > quotation here from RFC1521 (which I
On Tue 29 Nov 2022, at 16:52, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 26 Nov 2022 at 19:45:37 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
>> On Sat 26 Nov 2022, at 16:01, David Wright wrote:
>>> On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 20:38:46 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
[...]
On Tue 29 Nov 2022 at 12:31:09 (-0500), Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 11:02 AM David Wright
> wrote:
> > On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 20:38:46 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
> > > On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > I'm not sure this is a Tb bug, just p
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 11:02 AM David Wright wrote:
>
> On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 20:38:46 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
> > On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I'm not sure this is a Tb bug, just perhaps a "purist" way of doing
> > > things ...
> >
> > I had assumed no
On Sat 26 Nov 2022 at 19:45:37 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Sat 26 Nov 2022, at 16:01, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 20:38:46 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
> >> On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > I'm not sure this is a Tb bug, just perhaps a "p
On Sat 26 Nov 2022, at 16:01, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 20:38:46 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
>> On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
>> [...]
>> > I'm not sure this is a Tb bug, just perhaps a "purist" way of doing
>> > things ...
>>
>> I had assumed no blank lin
On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 20:38:46 (+), Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm not sure this is a Tb bug, just perhaps a "purist" way of doing
> > things ...
>
> I had assumed no blank line preceding a boundary was required as Tb still
> processe
On 11/22/22 17:22, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 22 Nov 2022, at 02:07, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/21/22 06:07, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Mon 21 Nov 2022, at 07:26, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
global, persistent setting.
If you still don't see the HTML version after doing that, please would you
con
> On 22 Nov 2022, at 02:07, gene heskett wrote:
>
> On 11/21/22 06:07, Gareth Evans wrote:
>> On Mon 21 Nov 2022, at 07:26, gene heskett wrote:
>> [...]
> global, persistent setting.
>> If you still don't see the HTML version after doing that, please would you
>> confirm which version of Th
On 11/21/22 06:07, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Mon 21 Nov 2022, at 07:26, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
global, persistent setting.
If you still don't see the HTML version after doing that, please would you
confirm which version of Thunderbird you are using?
Thanks,
Gareth
102.5.0(64bit)
.
Ch
On Mon 21 Nov 2022, at 07:26, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> I do not want to
> send html email, so the prefs here are set to send plain text.
>
> However I did change that setting momentarily, making no difference, I
> was still looking at a blank screen
[...]
> Those prefs in t-bird, should NOT
On 11/21/22 00:16, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Sun 20 Nov 2022, at 07:08, Tom Dial wrote:
On 11/19/22 10:09, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/19/22 11:45, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/19/22 06:45, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 19 Nov 2022, at 10:17, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 19 Nov 2022, at 04:08, gene hesket
On Sun 20 Nov 2022, at 07:08, Tom Dial wrote:
> On 11/19/22 10:09, gene heskett wrote:
>> On 11/19/22 11:45, gene heskett wrote:
>>> On 11/19/22 06:45, Gareth Evans wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2022, at 10:17, Gareth Evans wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Nov 2022, at 04:08, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/19/22 10:09, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/19/22 11:45, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/19/22 06:45, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 19 Nov 2022, at 10:17, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 19 Nov 2022, at 04:08, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/18/22 19:05, Gareth Evans wrote:
[...]
iirc, headers (that is, the
On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 20:15, Gareth Evans wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure this is a Tb bug, just perhaps a "purist" way of doing
> things ...
I had assumed no blank line preceding a boundary was required as Tb still
processes the boundary without one, but
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2049.ht
On Sat 19 Nov 2022, at 17:09, gene heskett
[...]
>> received from this online seller:
[...]
Hi Gene,
If I copy the message source you posted above, starting from
"Return Path:..."
and ending at the end of
"--=_Part_88_360748977.1668870493425--"
then
- paste that into a into a text
On 11/19/22 11:45, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/19/22 06:45, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 19 Nov 2022, at 10:17, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 19 Nov 2022, at 04:08, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/18/22 19:05, Gareth Evans wrote:
[...]
iirc, headers (that is, the lot of them) are supposed to be
terminate
18 matches
Mail list logo
