On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:35:59AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> 2014/09/22 5:21 "Ansgar Burchardt" :
>> >
>> > Hi Joel,
>> >
>> > Joel Rees writes:
>> > > (6) systemd and cgroups (at minimum) end up overriding the permissions
>> > > system.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 10:27 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:35:59AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>
>>> When I can, I'll file a bug report. If ever.
>>>
>>> I know the theory, so I don't use those, so it's not a high priority for
>>
On 09/22/2014 10:27 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:35:59AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
When I can, I'll file a bug report. If ever.
I know the theory, so I don't use those, so it's not a high priority for me.
If you are interested, read the manuals,do the math, it falls ou
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:35:59AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/09/22 5:21 "Ansgar Burchardt" :
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > Joel Rees writes:
> > > (6) systemd and cgroups (at minimum) end up overriding the permissions
> > > system. It's bad enough having SELinux and ACLs brought in to knock
> > >
2014/09/22 5:21 "Ansgar Burchardt" :
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> Joel Rees writes:
> > (6) systemd and cgroups (at minimum) end up overriding the permissions
> > system. It's bad enough having SELinux and ACLs brought in to knock
> > holes in the permissions system, but when arbitrary non-kernel system
> > f
5 matches
Mail list logo
