Re: swapfile

2009-05-18 Thread Tiago Saboga
Forwarding to the list... Charles Roberts writes: > Tiago Saboga wrote: >> steef writes: >> >>> hi list, >>> >>> starting up lenny, my machine hanged on 'activating swapfile swap' (or >>> something like that) >>> starting up my machine a second and third time did not give any >>> trouble at all.

Re: swapfile

2009-05-18 Thread steef
<..> mm... guess it's a hardware problem: the hd maybe as roger I don't think so. No problems with older versions, and never had any other problem with the disk - nothing in the logs, no smart warnings, no data corruption. Tiago. thanks, tiago: ok i'll have a good look at

Re: swapfile

2009-05-18 Thread Tiago Saboga
steef writes: > Tiago Saboga wrote: >> steef writes: >>> starting up lenny, my machine hanged on 'activating swapfile swap' (or >>> something like that) >>> starting up my machine a second and third time did not give any >>> trouble at all. >> It's happening too, exactly the same. That's just on

Re: swapfile

2009-05-18 Thread steef
Andrei Popescu wrote: On Mon,18.May.09, 07:08:35, steef wrote: suggested?? and, indeed, how trustworthy is smartmontools (smartctl -H /dev/hdx) ? According to the Google study (about hdd failures) a bad result from S.M.A.R.T. is almost always bad, but a good result doesn't mean the

Re: swapfile

2009-05-18 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,18.May.09, 07:08:35, steef wrote: > suggested?? and, indeed, how trustworthy is smartmontools (smartctl -H > /dev/hdx) ? According to the Google study (about hdd failures) a bad result from S.M.A.R.T. is almost always bad, but a good result doesn't mean the hdd is ok. Regards, Andrei

Re: swapfile

2009-05-17 Thread steef
Tiago Saboga wrote: steef writes: hi list, starting up lenny, my machine hanged on 'activating swapfile swap' (or something like that) starting up my machine a second and third time did not give any trouble at all. is there a generally known reason for a computerstart hanging on activatin

Re: swapfile

2009-05-17 Thread Tiago Saboga
steef writes: > hi list, > > starting up lenny, my machine hanged on 'activating swapfile swap' (or > something like that) > starting up my machine a second and third time did not give any > trouble at all. > > is there a generally known reason for a computerstart hanging on > activating a swapfi

Re: swapfile

2009-05-17 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:09:48PM +0200, steef wrote: > hi list, > > starting up lenny, my machine hanged on 'activating swapfile swap' (or > something like that) > > is there a generally known reason for a computerstart hanging on > activating a swapfile? If the same disk already had your ro

Re: Swapfile

2002-06-10 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Jens Karsten Müller wrote: > Hello, > > today i created a swapfile instead of a partition, because i think > it's more dynamic. I only see advantages using a swapfile. So first of > all, I'd like to know about disadvantages, because almost everybody > uses

Re: swapfile and more ram

1999-05-02 Thread David B.Teague
On Sat, 1 May 1999, add|ct|on wrote: > my question is this: i'm soon to be getting more ram, and i was > wondering if there's a way to resize my swap to make use of it. i have > 16 ram now, and my swap partition is about 32 megs. is it possible to > make it bigger after i move up to 32-48 ram wi

Re: swapfile and more ram

1999-05-01 Thread Oliver Elphick
add|ct|on wrote: >my question is this: i'm soon to be getting more ram, and i was >wondering if there's a way to resize my swap to make use of it. i have >16 ram now, and my swap partition is about 32 megs. is it possible to >make it bigger after i move up to 32-48 ram without messing with

Re: swapfile and more ram

1999-05-01 Thread Andrei Ivanov
> my question is this: i'm soon to be getting more ram, and i was > wondering if there's a way to resize my swap to make use of it. i have > 16 ram now, and my swap partition is about 32 megs. is it possible to > make it bigger after i move up to 32-48 ram without messing with > partitions again? i

Re: swapFILE vs swapDISK ??

1998-04-04 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Fri, Apr 03, 1998 at 01:33:24PM -0500, Nebu John Mathai wrote: > > Is there any performance loss to making swapfiles (large ones), as opposed > to having a static swap partition? > Will it (this may sound silly, but my hard drive is old too ... 1993) > increase the wear and tear on my hard driv

Re: swapFILE vs swapDISK ??

1998-04-03 Thread Jeff Shilt
> > > Hi, > I was wondering whether there are any benefits to using a swap partition > as opposed to using a swap file. > I am running debian 1.3 on a system with relatively low resources (200 > megs HD, 12 megs ram), and have it set up to have a 12 meg swap partition. > But, today I found out ab