Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-31 Thread tv.deb...@googlemail.com
31/08/2011 02:37, Todd Pytel wrote: > After doing a rather lengthy sid upgrade (it's been a few months, at > least), my Sun java plugin is no longer working in Iceweasel. > Alternatives is set correctly and Iceweasel sees the plugin, but it's > marked INVALID in pluginreg.dat and never loads. I Goo

Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-30 Thread Todd Pytel
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 19:37 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote: > After doing a rather lengthy sid upgrade (it's been a few months, at > least), my Sun java plugin is no longer working in Iceweasel. Aha... not so tricky after all. The problem is that the alternatives system still points to the old plugin loc

Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-30 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Todd Pytel wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 19:21 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: >> Please notice these combinations require experimental besides >> unstable, :-)  And to make the dependency handling easier, I just use >> aptitude in ncurses mode, since safe or full up

Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-30 Thread Todd Pytel
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 19:21 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: > Please notice these combinations require experimental besides > unstable, :-) And to make the dependency handling easier, I just use > aptitude in ncurses mode, since safe or full upgrades will mislead... I always use aptitude anyway, but

Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-30 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Todd Pytel wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 19:07 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: >> Well, for me the next combination of packages just works well (at some >> point in the past I needed to add experimental to have the latest >> combination of packages).  This is openjdk

Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-30 Thread Todd Pytel
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 19:07 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote: > Well, for me the next combination of packages just works well (at some > point in the past I needed to add experimental to have the latest > combination of packages). This is openjdk + icedtea: How are you running two different versions o

Re: Sun Java plugin invalid in Iceweasel? (sid)

2011-08-30 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Todd Pytel wrote: > ... is there another Java plugin that's functional? I > tried the icedtea one, but it seemed to have a dependency issue with > xulrunner that prevented installation. > > ... > > --Todd Well, for me the next combination of packages just works we

Re: Sun Java upgrade to 1.6.0_23 ?

2011-01-09 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:53:02 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 20:06 +, Camaleón wrote: >> Yep... I hope the installer is still as easy as it was last time I >> checked (I juts followed the on site install guide). > > > Well, tried this but was Very unsure about using up

Re: Sun Java upgrade to 1.6.0_23 ?

2011-01-08 Thread Kenward Vaughan
I still run into the menu issues with 1.6.0_23, it seems. I'm assuming what I describe below worked effectively. :(( On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 20:06 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:16:14 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:57 +, Camaleón wrote: > > >>

Re: Sun Java upgrade to 1.6.0_23 ?

2011-01-07 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:16:14 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:57 +, Camaleón wrote: >> Last time I installed (you don't "update" java but "install" a new >> release) Java JRE from Oracle's site was a straight forward step. After >> that, you can run "update-alternative

Re: Sun Java upgrade to 1.6.0_23 ?

2011-01-07 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:57 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:04:40 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: ... > > 1.6.0_23 is available on Sun's site, but I don't believe the upgrade is > > simple from what I've read. Is there a way to do this directly w/o > > waiting for the next packaging

Re: Sun Java upgrade to 1.6.0_23 ?

2011-01-07 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:04:40 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > I'm working with Jmol (www.jmol.org) under Debian Sid for a course I'm > teaching in a few weeks, but am running into a standing issue with the > current build of Sun Java found in Sid (RMB menus don't work properly). > > 1.6.0_23 is av

RE: Sun Java plugin doesn't work in Squeeze

2010-03-22 Thread Roger Morgan
--- On Mon, 3/22/10, James Zuelow wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Morgan [mailto:halbtaxabo-...@yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Monday, 22 March, 2010 09:02 > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Sun Java plugin doesn't work in Squeeze > > > > I've tried to run the Sun J

RE: Sun Java plugin doesn't work in Squeeze

2010-03-22 Thread James Zuelow
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Morgan [mailto:halbtaxabo-...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, 22 March, 2010 09:02 > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Sun Java plugin doesn't work in Squeeze > > I've tried to run the Sun Java plugin in both Iceweasel and > Firefox on Squeeze wit

Re: sun-java

2008-06-13 Thread Anooshiravan Merat
on the assumption that you are using firefox/iceweasel, yes. To confirm, navigate to the "about:plugins" page and make sure you see itlisted there. You can also try any number of java test sites on the web. I recommend using one hosted by sun itself. - Anooshiravan Merat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: sun-java

2008-06-05 Thread Raquel
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:02:46 -0700 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 05:18:23PM -0700, Raquel wrote: > > I have an upcoming need to use a web site that has java applets. > > I've installed sun-java5-bin, sun-java5-jre, sun-java5-plugin, > > sun-java5-fonts.

Re: sun-java

2008-06-05 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 05:18:23PM -0700, Raquel wrote: > I have an upcoming need to use a web site that has java applets. > I've installed sun-java5-bin, sun-java5-jre, sun-java5-plugin, > sun-java5-fonts. Will that pretty much do what I'll probably need? on the assumption that you are using fir

Re: Sun Java jre 5 installation deb

2005-07-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > If the JRE version has not changed and the previous deb package was > created in Sarge, there is no need to do it over. And/or you can use http://www.debian-unofficial.org/ for future updates. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist E

Re: Sun Java jre 5 installation deb

2005-07-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:02:52PM -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote: > Dear friends: > > I have just done a complete, fresh install of Debian 3.1 Sarge. > > In the earlier install I created a deb package from the Sun Java jre 5 file > in > accordance with instructions provided on a Debian site. My q

Re: Sun Java - revisited. *SOLVED* and Thanks

2004-08-27 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 27 August 2004 14:27, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: Hi Kevin, I'd like to thank you twice for your help with this. First, it solved my problem. Secondly, (being new to Debian) I wasn't aware of apt-file. Great tool. - ---Michael > Hi Michael,

Re: Sun Java - revisited

2004-08-27 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi Michael, > j2eesdk-1_4_2.bin: error while loading shared libraries: > libstd++-libc6.2-2.so.3: Cannot open shared object file: > No such file or directory. > > I do have libstd++6 installed on my system, and apt reports that it is the > latest version. I don't see a way to

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-28 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:40:40PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: | "Unable to initialize threads: can not find class /java/lang/Threads" That means the JVM couldn't find "rt.jar" (as it's called in jdk >= 1.2, I don't remember the 1.1 name anymore). Hmm, as I recall, old JVMs (eg 1.1.x) would

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-27 Thread Fraser Campbell
Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > Is the java sun 1.3.1 version compatible with testing? If so, do they > have debs, apt sources, or just plain download? > Thanks, Dough ( I am very interested in this drawboard thing, and don't > have a clue about java programming, so I will probably need all the help >

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-27 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
Is the java sun 1.3.1 version compatible with testing? If so, do they have debs, apt sources, or just plain download? Thanks, Dough ( I am very interested in this drawboard thing, and don't have a clue about java programming, so I will probably need all the help that I can get) If that really m

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-27 Thread Douglas Guptill
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:40:40PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > I got pass the "classpath" issue. Now it tells me > "Unable to initialize threads: can not find class /java/lang/Threads" > I figure it most likely be a bug of the drawboard itself. Am I right? Probably not. > Or may be some jav

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-27 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
I got pass the "classpath" issue. Now it tells me "Unable to initialize threads: can not find class /java/lang/Threads" I figure it most likely be a bug of the drawboard itself. Am I right? Or may be some java library that I must install ??? Thanks again for the help. Douglas Guptill wrote: On S

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-26 Thread Douglas Guptill
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > I am trying to install drawboard (http://drawboard.souceforge.net) in my > home network as trial before making it accessible to the outer world. But > when I run > "java -cp ." as indicated the response from the system is "unk

Re: Sun java in testing

2003-01-26 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Antonio Rodriguez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030126 11:13]: > I am trying to install drawboard (http://drawboard.souceforge.net) in my > home network as trial before making it accessible to the outer world. But > when I run > "java -cp ." as indicated the response from the system is "unknown > opti

re: Sun Java WorkShop on Debian' experience anyone?

1997-04-14 Thread Michael Laing
Hi: The specific 'editor freeze' problem that you have can be bypassed by turning off 'version control' in the jws preferences. The above was gleaned from http://httwww.blackdown.org. ml Benedikt wrote: does anyone out there have any experience running the Sun jws on a Debian GNU/Linux syste

Re: 'Sun Java WorkShop on Debian' experience anyone?

1997-04-12 Thread Lawrence Chim
Benedikt Eric Heinen wrote: > > > jdk 1.0.2 with no problem, though I am not using it now. > > Did you need to install any patches to make it run? > SuSE delivered a modified classes.zip along with jws, claiming the > original wouldn't work... > no, but you need the linux port jws from blackbur

Re: 'Sun Java WorkShop on Debian' experience anyone?

1997-04-11 Thread Benedikt Eric Heinen
> jdk 1.0.2 with no problem, though I am not using it now. Did you need to install any patches to make it run? SuSE delivered a modified classes.zip along with jws, claiming the original wouldn't work... Benedikt signoff --- Benedikt Eric Heinen - Muehlemattstrasse 53 - CH3007 Bern - S

Re: 'Sun Java WorkShop on Debian' experience anyone?

1997-04-11 Thread Lawrence Chim
Benedikt Eric Heinen wrote: > > Hi there, > > does anyone out there have any experience running the Sun jws on a > Debian GNU/Linux system. On my system the jws freezes completely when I > try to use the jws source editor. Does anyone know of a fix? Or - if you > got the jws running, can you te