2007/5/10, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.
Here's what I want:
low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
Most of the time, x apps
On 5/10/07, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
> Rock solid stable. A focus on good design and being bug-free over
> adding 'features'.
This is pretty much a matter of taste. For light WMs, the ones I've
tried and heard of are:
fluxbox
ice
> low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
> Rock solid stable. A focus on good design and being bug-free over
> adding 'features'.
I recommend ctwm.
But you'll have to go through editing a config file.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
ion3 (ion2 is)
not in debian but just depends on lua-5.1
hth
martin
On 5/11/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:11:25PM -0700, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> On May 10, 12:10 pm, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are a lot of window
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:11:25PM -0700, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> On May 10, 12:10 pm, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
> > test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.
>
> Fluxb
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:45:16PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
> test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.
>
> Here's what I want:
>
>
> low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
>
On May 10, 12:10 pm, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
> test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.
>
Fluxbox?
http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/
Certainly fills the rock solid bill.
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:45:16PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> I used to use icewm but the configuration and menu-editing apps don't
> seem to be in etch.
My .icewm/preferences has 10 lines excluding comments. I never edit the
menu because my main apps are in .icewm/toolbar which has a
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:45:16 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Hi Doug,
I have had roughly the same requirements for a lightweight wm on an old
laptop (Pentium 133 and 32MB ram, NetBSD 3.0). After having tried fluxbox,
blackbox, icewm and many others, I found that WindowMaker was not slower
but
9 matches
Mail list logo