On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 02:32:41PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> 1. hamm is not kernel dependent. I have used 2.0.29-34 on it.
Thanks.
> 2. make sure /etc/sudoers is ok (i.e. read sudo's man page)
/etc/sudoers and /etc/hosts are unchanged from bo to hamm but the new
"sudo" did not accept the "hostname
1. hamm is not kernel dependant. I have used 2.0.29-34 on it.
2. make sure /etc/sudoers is ok (i.e. read sudo's man page)
Jack Kern wrote:
>
> I upgraded from bo to hamm with little difficulty thanks to the
> autoup.sh script and the testimonials herein as to the systems readiness
> for users.
2 matches
Mail list logo
