On Fri 02 Mar 2018 at 23:56:02 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 28/02/2018 à 21:13, David Wright a écrit :
> >>>#
> >>># /etc/interfaces.d/directcable for west 2018-02-25
> >>>
> >>>auto eth0
> >>>iface eth0 inet static
> >>> address 192.168.2.15/24
> >>
> >>Fine. You could also add "allow-ho
Le 28/02/2018 à 21:13, David Wright a écrit :
#
# /etc/interfaces.d/directcable for west 2018-02-25
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.2.15/24
Fine. You could also add "allow-hotplug eth0" in case eth0 would be
discovered late.
OK. Tried that here. The ip a is before and
On Wed 28 Feb 2018 at 19:42:27 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 28/02/2018 à 18:14, David Wright a écrit :
> >
> >$ cat /etc/network/interfaces /etc/network/interfaces.d/directcable
> ># This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> ># and how to activate them. For more
Le 28/02/2018 à 18:14, David Wright a écrit :
$ cat /etc/network/interfaces /etc/network/interfaces.d/directcable
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*
# The
On Tue 27 Feb 2018 at 20:59:17 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 25/02/2018 à 18:35, David Wright a écrit :
> >On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 09:49:27 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> >
> On disadvantage is that these addresses are not globally unique (the
> link local prefix exists on all inter
Le 25/02/2018 à 18:35, David Wright a écrit :
On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 09:49:27 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On disadvantage is that these addresses are not globally unique (the
link local prefix exists on all interfaces) and must be appended
with an interface name.
Not an issue here. The onl
On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 09:49:27 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 22/02/2018 à 22:57, David Wright a écrit :
> >On Tue 23 Jan 2018 at 20:56:31 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> >>Le 23/01/2018 à 18:08, David Wright a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>[My Laptop] --- wireless connection IPv4 --- [Router] --- Int
On 2018-02-24, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> Anyway, we have a saying here which roughly translates to : "you cannot
> force an unthirsty donkey to drink".
I looked it up (because neither me nor hubby--de vieille souche--recognized
it right off).
On ne saurait faire boire un âne qui n’a pas soif.
Le 22/02/2018 à 22:57, David Wright a écrit :
On Tue 23 Jan 2018 at 20:56:31 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2018 à 18:08, David Wright a écrit :
[My Laptop] --- wireless connection IPv4 --- [Router] --- Internet Modem
| / |
| CAT5 c
On Tue 23 Jan 2018 at 20:56:31 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 23/01/2018 à 18:08, David Wright a écrit :
> >
> >[My Laptop] --- wireless connection IPv4 --- [Router] --- Internet Modem
> > | / |
> > | CAT5 cable IPv6/
I didn't read all the answers (only half of those). But I have the same
problem and I now think it has nothing to do with named, bind (4 8 or 9).
During Stretch installation with netinst, Network-manager configured once for
all /etc/hostname and /etc/resolv.conf. As I have only one routable addr
Le 23/01/2018 à 18:08, David Wright a écrit :
[My Laptop] --- wireless connection IPv4 --- [Router] --- Internet Modem
| / |
| CAT5 cable IPv6/ |
| / | wireless/wired
[My De
On Tue 23 Jan 2018 at 16:06:01 (-), Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <20180123144327.GA6815@alum>,
>David Wright wrote:
> > This would all be a step in the wrong direction here. Point (2) was
> > that using IPv6 over CAT5 avoids swamping the router. (Of course,
> > that's a
Hi,
In article <20180123144327.GA6815@alum>,
David Wright wrote:
> This would all be a step in the wrong direction here. Point (2) was
> that using IPv6 over CAT5 avoids swamping the router. (Of course,
> that's already been snipped out of the thread.) If the DHCP server
> is down, then
On Tue 23 Jan 2018 at 13:41:31 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:12:41 + (UTC)
> Curt wrote:
>
> > On 2018-01-23, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > In article <20180122185135.GA12212@alum>,
> > >David Wright wrote:
> > >>> You should be able to do that with IPv4 to
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:12:41 + (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2018-01-23, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In article <20180122185135.GA12212@alum>,
> >David Wright wrote:
> >>> You should be able to do that with IPv4 too. If DHCP address
> >>> allocation fails,
> >>
> >> Elaborate on
On 2018-01-23, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
> In article <20180122185135.GA12212@alum>,
>David Wright wrote:
>>> You should be able to do that with IPv4 too. If DHCP address allocation
>>> fails,
>>
>> Elaborate on this please. What do you mean by "fails".
>> What am I meant to want to fa
Hi,
In article <20180122185135.GA12212@alum>,
David Wright wrote:
>> You should be able to do that with IPv4 too. If DHCP address allocation
>> fails,
>
> Elaborate on this please. What do you mean by "fails".
> What am I meant to want to fail?
If a host that's expecting to receive its
On Mon 22 Jan 2018 at 17:21:23 (-), Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <20180119151835.GA8374@alum>,
>David Wright wrote:
> > I have one valuable use for IPv6 which is point-to-point connections.
> > I plug a CAT5 cable into the two ends and use predefined functions
> > to bu
Hi,
In article <20180119151835.GA8374@alum>,
David Wright wrote:
> I have one valuable use for IPv6 which is point-to-point connections.
> I plug a CAT5 cable into the two ends and use predefined functions
> to bulk-transfer files with scp. Why?
> 1) I don't have to touch the IPv4 confi
Le 19/01/2018 à 06:10, D. R. Evans a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg wrote on 01/18/2018 02:41 PM:
Note : ping is not a proper DNS tool becaus it calls the libc resolver
for name resolution, which may use other name sources than DNS. Use dig,
host or nslookup instead.
I admit that I'm quite surprised
Le 19/01/2018 à 16:14, Rob van der Putten a écrit :
If you have got your own IPv6 /48 combined with RFC1918 IPv4 then split
horizon DNS is probably a good idea;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-horizon_DNS
Why ?
My home network also has private IPv4 + global IPv6 addresse and I use
spli
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 04:14:38PM +0100, Rob van der Putten wrote:
AFAIK Bind is the only named with a good split horizon implementation.
most implementations will let you bind to a particular IP so you can run
different configurations on internal & external IPs. bind has a lot of
configurat
On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:47:25 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:45:23AM -, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> > Apologies for the slight thread hijack.
> >
> > What would people recommend for a home LAN DNS server that is authoritative
> > for a single domain, providing A, , P
Hi
On 19/01/18 15:08, Andy Hawkins wrote:
I guess I don't *need* IPv6, but as a technology geek it's just something I
wanted to play around with. I've set up a tunnel with Hurricane Electric
that gets me a fully routable IPv6 prefix that I can assign an address from
to each of the devices on m
Hi,
In article <102059aa-fd21-11e7-9b6a-00163eeb5...@msgid.mathom.us>,
Michael Stone wrote:
> If you said why you were looking to abandon a (presumably working?)
> solution that might help explain your requirements. If your goal is
> simple integration between DNS and DHCP (which is n
Hi,
In article <20180119134725.lk5gywprdit4s...@eeg.ccf.org>,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> My only experience is with bind8, bind9, and tinydns (from djbdns).
> I've never used IPv6 for anything. None of the networks that I deal
> with use IPv6, period. They don't even have the option.
>
>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:27:57PM -, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
In article ,
john doe wrote:
What would people recommend for a home LAN DNS server that is authoritative
for a single domain, providing A, , PTR (both IPv4 and IPv6), NS and
CNAME records to that domain?
Have a l
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 08:47:25AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I have to wonder what kind of home you live in, that requires local
IPv6. Most homes are small enough that you can get by with the roughly
2^24 addresses available in the private IPv4 ranges (10/8, 192.168/16,
and 172.16/12).
So, my
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:45:23AM -, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Apologies for the slight thread hijack.
>
> What would people recommend for a home LAN DNS server that is authoritative
> for a single domain, providing A, , PTR (both IPv4 and IPv6), NS and
> CNAME records to that domain?
My onl
Hi,
In article ,
john doe wrote:
>> What would people recommend for a home LAN DNS server that is authoritative
>> for a single domain, providing A, , PTR (both IPv4 and IPv6), NS and
>> CNAME records to that domain?
>>
>
> Have a look at:
>
> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/d
On 1/19/2018 12:45 PM, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Apologies for the slight thread hijack.
In article <20180118214314.442arvnrw4xbx...@eeg.ccf.org>,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
The pacakge for ISC's BIND is called bind9.
This would certainly do the job, but it's massively overkill for a simp
Hi,
Apologies for the slight thread hijack.
In article <20180118214314.442arvnrw4xbx...@eeg.ccf.org>,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> The pacakge for ISC's BIND is called bind9.
>
> This would certainly do the job, but it's massively overkill for a simple
> home LAN DNS server. Nevertheless, i
Greg Wooledge wrote on 01/18/2018 02:43 PM:
>
> The pacakge for ISC's BIND is called bind9.
>
> This would certainly do the job, but it's massively overkill for a simple
> home LAN DNS server. Nevertheless, if it's what you already know, there
> is benefit in using the known but overengineered
Pascal Hambourg wrote on 01/18/2018 02:41 PM:
>
> named is not a package name. The package name is and has always been
> bind9. Note that there are other recursive DNS server packages such as
> unbound.
Ah! It's been so long since I've built a system that didn't install bind
automatically that
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:34:50PM -0700, D. R. Evans wrote:
> Can someone please point me to intelligible instructions as to how to have the
> stretch box respond correctly to remote DNS requests coming in over the local
> network?
Install a name server. Make sure it's listening on your LAN addr
Le 18/01/2018 à 22:34, D. R. Evans a écrit :
I am trying to configure a debian stretch box to provide certain services to
my home network. (In the past this was a wheezy box, and I had everything
working fine. I have not changed the configuration of any other machine; so,
for example, DNS request
37 matches
Mail list logo
