Marty wrote:
PS since you are upgrading to testing you should understand that you
are volunteering to break your system often and repeatedly in the name of
science. Thanks for your display of spirit and fortitude. Although I
eventually tired of the exercise I'm glad others had stepped up to
Wu-Kung Sun wrote:
apt-get turns out to be mostly the same. I started using aptitude
since I thought it was supposed to replace apt-get when sarge went
stable. Now both apt-get and aptitude want to remove aptitude. It's
a hint I think.
Yes, I think maybe it's a hint. Maybe you should take i
apt-get turns out to be mostly the same. I started using aptitude
since I thought it was supposed to replace apt-get when sarge went
stable. Now both apt-get and aptitude want to remove aptitude. It's
a hint I think. Thanks everyone for the advice.
# apt-get -s dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lis
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:45:25PM -0500, Wu-Kung Sun wrote:
> I want to start tracking testing instead of stable. Attached (since
> it's long) is the output of "aptitude -s dist-upgrade." Why are so
> many things being removed? Why are so many things being held back
> when updated versions are
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:01:32PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
> Wu-Kung Sun wrote:
> >I want to start tracking testing instead of stable.
> > [...]
> Perhaps a
> better approach would be: apt-get upgrade (change your sources to
> testi
Wu-Kung Sun wrote:
I want to start tracking testing instead of stable. Attached (since
it's long) is the output of "aptitude -s dist-upgrade." Why are so
many things being removed? Why are so many things being held back
when updated versions are clearly shown? (I've never manually set
anythin
6 matches
Mail list logo
