On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:48:26PM -0600, Telly Williams wrote:
> > if you talk about the target computer being a windows host then cygwin
> > has an ssh daemon, personally I use rdesktop for windows as the shell
> > is pretty useless on windows imho.
> >
> > if you talk about another machine bein
> if you talk about the target computer being a windows host then cygwin
> has an ssh daemon, personally I use rdesktop for windows as the shell
> is pretty useless on windows imho.
>
> if you talk about another machine being windows and your home machine
> - being remote and the target google for
Hi,
2007/10/11, Telly Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I see some of you talking about SSHing into your computer from
> another. What if the computer you're
> using isn't Linux/Unix?
if you talk about the target computer being a windows host then cygwin
has an ssh
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> try putty for windows
no matter how much putty you apply, its still just windows!
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Telly Williams escribió:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
try putty for windows
Thank you.
Actually, to be able to connect from a linux machine to a windows
machine you also need a ssh server (well, the same goes for the inverse)
that does not come prein
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> try putty for windows
>
Thank you.
--
Telly Williams
"Knowledge Is Power"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
try putty for windows
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:20:52AM -0600, Telly Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see some of you talking about SSHing into your computer from
> another. What if the computer you're
> using isn't Linux/Unix? I was thinking that you could reboot
> that com
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:50:43AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I noticed today that openssh released version 2.9 Monday. Can someone
> tell me why debian is using 1.2.3-9.3. Is it that debian is only
> supporting ssh1, or is the version numbering just different? Thank you
> for your time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I noticed today that openssh released version 2.9 Monday. Can someone
> tell me why debian is using 1.2.3-9.3. Is it that debian is only
> supporting ssh1, or is the version numbering just different? Thank you
> for your time.
simple really. when openssh2
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Andrew Hall wrote:
> This may be silly, but here goes. I have downloaded the new version os ssh
> due to the security
> announcement a little bit ago. Looking at its depends I see that it requires
> libz1 but I can not
> find that package anywhere on the debian site. I do
On Mon, May 11, 1998 at 01:16:55PM +1000, Drake Diedrich wrote:
>An alternative is to run ssh-agent and ssh-add from your
> .login/.profile files, and save the output (export SSH_*=... lines) to a
> temporary file for future sourcing. Email me if you want bash versions
> (they're on an offline
Hi,
Have you considered using the tcp wrapper support that ssh has? By the
way, is the Debian ssh package compiled with tcp wrapper support? Anyway,
assuming it is, if you really need to have an empty passphrase I would
strongly suggest that you only allow secure shell logins from trusted
machin
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 09:15:07PM +0100, G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the replys. The RSA keys method can be made not to ask for
> anything if you put no passphrase, and that is my question. I can do what
> I want without a passphrase. But is this safe ??
> The man page of ssh-keygen
On Sun, 10 May 1998, G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the replys. The RSA keys method can be made not to ask for
> anything if you put no passphrase, and that is my question. I can do what
> I want without a passphrase. But is this safe ??
> The man page of ssh-keygen says that if you p
Thanks for all the replys. The RSA keys method can be made not to ask for
anything if you put no passphrase, and that is my question. I can do what
I want without a passphrase. But is this safe ??
The man page of ssh-keygen says that if you put no passphrase YOU SHOULD
KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. Th
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 03:28:40PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> yes, but even then ssh asks for a password, I've tried every authentication
> method described in the ssh man page, but I couldn't get it to login without
> manual authentication
rhosts with RSA host authentication is what you wish.
> ssh CAN replace both rsh and rlogin, To do things as you would with rsh,
> you use 'ssh '. The trick is that you must first put the public
> keys for each system into either /etc/ssh or your .ssh directory (in the
> files ssh_known_keys or known_keys respectively). The easiest way to do
> this
On Sun, 10 May 1998, G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> After some security incident on my network I decided to set up ssh.
> I think I have figured most things of interest to me out. However,
> before I had rsh in ascript to start my mail program which is another host
> through FvwmBut
Following sent to Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Adam;
I suggest that you 'poke around' a bit at:
http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-doc/
(Debian Documentation Project)
-bill
Get free e-mail and a perma
> > Hope it's useful to some one out there...
>
> Why not make that a mini-HOWTO, and get it into a distribution
> somewhere? I fond a use for this, and so, IMHO, will others.
Happy to... does anyone know how I go about doing this or if there is
something already existant that it would be better
On Thu, 06 Nov 1997 02:48:26 -0900 Adam Shand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm setting up an automated script which needs the functionality of rsh to
> execute some commands on a remote machine, and I need it to *not* prompt
> for a pasword. I know that I can do this with SSH using a .shosts fil
21 matches
Mail list logo
