Re: SSH pam

1999-12-14 Thread Patrick Kirk
Thanks for the link to putty. Tried it. It works well. And fits on a floppy. What I'll do is have it on my web-site so I can download it anytime. BTW, http://www.securityportal.com/lasg/file/index.html is a great resource. Many thanks. Patrick

Re: ssh pam

1999-12-14 Thread Onno
>However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want >a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client. Nope, try TerraTerm with the SSH plugin. It is free and quite good! Regards, Onno

Re: SSH pam

1999-12-14 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Glen S Mehn) wrote: >With ssh you have to connect with a secure client, which you can get on >any unix, and there's a free one for win32, called putty, which is very >nice. Supports telnet, too. > >The problem with telnet is that nayone who wants to sniff your network >can get ev

RE: ssh pam

1999-12-13 Thread Paul McHale
> However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want > a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client. > Teraterm is one free windows ssh client (the only one I know of). -- Paul McHale Work: 937-253-7610 Double E Solutions Mobile: 937-371-2828 4912 Effingham Fax:413-

Re: ssh pam

1999-12-13 Thread Hey Tom I Changed My Name!
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:16:56AM +0900, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want > > a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client. take a look at http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ - Cygwin (GPL) provides a unix

Re: ssh pam

1999-12-13 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:16:56AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want > a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client. Nope. See http://www.zip.com.au/~roca/ttssh.html for TTSSH, which allows TeraTerm Pro (linked to from that page, and also free) to use

re: SSH pam

1999-12-13 Thread Glen S Mehn
With ssh you have to connect with a secure client, which you can get on any unix, and there's a free one for win32, called putty, which is very nice. Supports telnet, too. The problem with telnet is that nayone who wants to sniff your network can get every packet decrypted from plain old text. So

Re: ssh pam

1999-12-13 Thread Brian Boonstra
> However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want > a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client. TeraTerm SSH is free, and works prety well. B

Re: ssh pam

1999-12-13 Thread hservoma
Patrick Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I rarely access my box other than by telnet and I'm >told that I should use a more secure setup. >What is the Debian recommended approach? ssh? PAM? >Are they hard to implement? I often use a different PC >so I need a sloution that does not require a

Re: ssh pam

1999-12-13 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:12:46PM +, Patrick Kirk wrote: > What is the Debian recommended approach? ssh? PAM? > Are they hard to implement? I often use a different PC > so I need a sloution that does not require a secure client. ssh is very easy, but you need a secure client. Use of ssh is