Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-22 Thread Bob Proulx
Marc Wilson wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > That isn't right either. IRQ7 is not the lowest priority interrupt > > How do you figure that IRQ7 isn't the lowest priority interrupt? > > IRQ0timer tick > IRQ1keyboard > IRQ2chained to IRQ9 > | IRQ8RTC > |__IRQ9chained t

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-20 Thread Daniel B.
Marc Wilson wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:09:35PM -0400, Daniel B. wrote: > > Bob Proulx wrote: > > > > > > Daniel B. wrote: > > > > Is this something I need to do something about: > > > > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > > > > > > ... > > > > ... > > ... W

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-20 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:35:13AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > It isn't right. What it means is that an interrupt was asserted, but by > > the time the hardware got around to telling the CPU, it wasn't there any > > more. IRQ7 is the lowest priority interrupt, and that's where the service > > ro

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-20 Thread Bob Proulx
Marc Wilson wrote: > Daniel B. wrote: > > Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Daniel B. wrote: > > > > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > > > Just ignore it. It basically means that you do not have anything > > > connected to the parallel port. > > That obviously can't be right--I

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-20 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:09:35PM -0400, Daniel B. wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > > > Daniel B. wrote: > > > Is this something I need to do something about: > > > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > > > > Just ignore it. It basically means that you do not have anythi

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-19 Thread Daniel B.
Bob Proulx wrote: > > Daniel B. wrote: > > Is this something I need to do something about: > > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > > Just ignore it. It basically means that you do not have anything > connected to the parallel port. That obviously can't be right--I ha

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-19 Thread Bob Proulx
Daniel B. wrote: > Is this something I need to do something about: > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. Just ignore it. It basically means that you do not have anything connected to the parallel port. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#spurious-8259A-interr

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-19 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:09:13AM -0400, Daniel B. wrote: > Is this something I need to do something about: > > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > > I'm running 2.4.18 with SMP (AMD Athlon MPs). You've to options a) if everything works fine just ignore it b) if somet

Re: "spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7."

2003-10-19 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Sunday 19 October 2003 17:09, Daniel B. wrote: > Is this something I need to do something about: > > Oct 18 20:29:30 dsb kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > > I'm running 2.4.18 with SMP (AMD Athlon MPs). Considering that "turn off SMP support" is a solution to the problem... ;-) Nobod

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: irq7.

2002-06-27 Thread Richard Weil
I didn't look at the kernel source and I don't remember seeing the discussion on the list, but I think I got rid of this by unchecking 'Local APIC support on uniprocessor' under 'processor type and features' in the kernel config (using make menuconfig). Obviously, this then involves recompiling the

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: irq7.

2002-06-27 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Thursday 27 June 2002 18:14, Cheryl Homiak wrote: > I've gotten this message a couple of times lately, I think both times > while burning a cd. And /proc/interrupts doesn't show anything on > irq7. Has anybody gotten this kind of a warning and does anybody know > what it means? We had this on t

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ??

2001-12-13 Thread hanasaki
So I think you are saying it is ok to have the spurious interrupt.. the only issue is hosing the console? I am worried about having the interrupt... I can live w/ hosing the console till that gets fixed. Stan Brown wrote: On Thu Dec 13 10:25:47 2001 J.A.Serralheiro wrote... something about

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ??

2001-12-13 Thread Stan Brown
On Thu Dec 13 10:25:47 2001 J.A.Serralheiro wrote... > >something about the printer not being requesting any service and >the interrupt line is generating interrupts. maybe some interference, >I dont know. Its not a problem because the hardware has a bit to let the >cpu know if in fact an interrupt

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ??

2001-12-13 Thread J.A.Serralheiro
something about the printer not being requesting any service and the interrupt line is generating interrupts. maybe some interference, I dont know. Its not a problem because the hardware has a bit to let the cpu know if in fact an interrupt has happened. On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Stan Brown wrote: >

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ??

2001-12-13 Thread Dragos
On Thursday 13 December 2001 06:37 am, nate wrote: > > > > A new woody machine that I am seting up just started dispaying this > > on the console. > > > > spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 > > Are you using a SMP kernel on a UP machine? running a quick > search came up with this: > http://www.uwsg.iu

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ??

2001-12-12 Thread nate
> A new woody machine that I am seting up just started dispaying this > on the console. > > spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 Are you using a SMP kernel on a UP machine? running a quick search came up with this: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0010.1/0420.html another thread mentioned

Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ??

2001-12-12 Thread hanasaki
Hmmm no clue.. but I get it too. Stan Brown wrote: A new woody machine that I am seting up just started dispaying this on the console. spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 Whar?t's it trying to tell me?