Tim Verry wrote:
Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
This:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/
search_contents.pl?word=smbfs.o&searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=stable&arch=i386
tells me that smbfs.o is in the 2.2.20 kernel image package, so that
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 16:52, Tim Verry wrote:
> I have a pentium 200, non mmx. Do I need i586 or can I use i686?
You must choose i586, mmx or not. Same for the K6. i686 would PPro
upwards.
From the kernel doc, a few widely used conventions of varying relevance
to the current topic :
Here are t
I have a pentium 200, non mmx. Do I need i586 or can I use i686?
On Monday 25 November 2002 17:42, sean finney wrote:
> i think your problem is that the kernel installed by default doesn't
> seem to support smbfs. if you're not completely attached to said kernel
> and want to join the rest of th
Hi
I'm not sure if I'm totally out here, but have u tryed apt-get install
smbfs?
If I do apt-cache show smbfs it gives a lot of output, here is some:
Source: samba
Version: 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3
Replaces: smbfsx
Depends: netbase (>= 2.02), samba-common (= 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3), libc6
(>= 2.2.5-13),
Tim Verry said:
> I can't find it at all, used "locate" and KDE's "find files". Would there
> be any harm in just acquiring this file and throwing it in there?
if you can get the file from the 2.2.20 kernel there wouldn't be
much harm, you would probably have to load it via insmod -f smbfs.o
(t
On Monday 25 November 2002 18:00, nate wrote:
> that shows all the packages in woody which have the smbfs.o file(kernel
> module). the default 2.2.20 kernel appears to have it, is there not
> a /lib/modules/2.2.20/fs/smbfs.o on your system?
Nope. But the stuff in /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/fs ar
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:06:26PM -0500, Tim Verry wrote:
>
> mount -t smbfs -o username=me,password=foobar //server/share /dir/dir
> ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
> Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
> smbmnt failed: 255
> Have a variety of samba tools installed, i
Tim Verry said:
> Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
>
> I've never compiled any kernels. I'm curious though how to do it if it's
> the answer to this problem. Hopefully then I can figure out what went
> wrong.
>
> I assume that it should have just been in the ke
i think your problem is that the kernel installed by default doesn't
seem to support smbfs. if you're not completely attached to said kernel
and want to join the rest of the 2.4 world, i recommend:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18
you may need to add a line to lilo.conf about initrd (not su
Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
I've never compiled any kernels. I'm curious though how to do it if it's the
answer to this problem. Hopefully then I can figure out what went wrong.
I assume that it should have just been in the kernel, right? I can count
Tim Verry said:
> Woody with kernel 2.2.20, newest KDE, updated apache, sendmail, webmin
> installed, other than that pretty basic.
from the rest of your comments i get the idea that you possibly compiled
your own 2.2.20 kernel. the smbfs is part of the kernel not part of
samba. smbfs in samba I
11 matches
Mail list logo
