Brad Rogers wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
>
> Hello Joel,
>
> >`killall plugin-container` is often enough
> Great tip, thanks. I'll try it out next time flash drags.
FWIW, this was revealed to me by running top.
--
Joel Roth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:14:21 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
Hello Joel,
>`killall plugin-container` is often enough
Great tip, thanks. I'll try it out next time flash drags.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Two sides
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:16:26PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:07:21 -0400 (EDT)
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Hello Stephen,
>
> >I have been using the iceweasel web browser for years; but in the past
> >several weeks using an up-to-date jessie system, iceweasel has become
On Wed 23 Oct 2013 at 21:36:54 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:47:45 -0400 (EDT), Brian wrote:
> >
> > Didn't you have some sort of problem with X recently? Something to do
> > with your video adapter? What driver are you using with it at present?
>
> I did. The mach64 dr
Stephen Powell wrote:
> I have been using the iceweasel web browser for years; but in the past
> several weeks using an up-to-date jessie system, iceweasel has become
> very sluggish.
Until a couple of weeks ago I had a really strange speed problem with
FF/Iceweasel. It would run really happily e
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:47:45 -0400 (EDT), Brian wrote:
>
> Didn't you have some sort of problem with X recently? Something to do
> with your video adapter? What driver are you using with it at present?
I did. The mach64 driver crashed during initialization and I switched to
the vesa driver for
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:37 -0400 (EDT), Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
>
> I do not see this problem. What is your hardware?
i386 platform. Intel Xeon processor. A single hyperthreaded core
(two threads). SMP kernel. 2.40 GHz processor speed. 4G of RAM.
ATI Range XL video chip. mach64 X driver.
I have seen my iceweasel on my workstation continually grab up more and
more memory and/or CPU.
I suspect it is either a or more like a combination of ad-ons that are
causing a memory leak. I have reduced it to the minimum I need to feel
comfortable (adblock plus, request policy, tab mix plus, etc
On Wed 23 Oct 2013 at 09:07:21 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> I have been using the iceweasel web browser for years; but in the past several
> weeks using an up-to-date jessie system, iceweasel has become very sluggish.
> Even the simplest operations, like scrolling the screen, have become so
> s
On Wednesday 23 October 2013 14:07:21 Stephen Powell wrote:
> I have been using the iceweasel web browser for years; but in the
> past several weeks using an up-to-date jessie system, iceweasel has
> become very sluggish. Even the simplest operations, like scrolling
> the screen, have become so slu
I agree. Over the last couple of months I have tried to use Iceweasel, but
despite it's attractive add-ons, I always end up going back to Chromium for
the reasons you state. I have tried renaming the profile folder and various
tweaks, but could never get it to work well. The tabs are slow to switch
Stephen Powell writes:
> I have been using the iceweasel web browser for years; but in the past several
> weeks using an up-to-date jessie system, iceweasel has become very sluggish.
> Even the simplest operations, like scrolling the screen, have become so
> sluggish
> that iceweasel has become
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:07:21 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
Hello Stephen,
>I have been using the iceweasel web browser for years; but in the past
>several weeks using an up-to-date jessie system, iceweasel has become
>very sluggish.
No problems here, Stephen. Although, sometimes, flash can
13 matches
Mail list logo