Re: slow inetd

2000-08-24 Thread Neil L. Roeth
Where can I find out more about nsswitch.conf and related subjects? Obviously I did a man nsswitch.conf, but it doesn't go into detail regarding the libraries it uses, i.e., libnss_*, what's in them or if you need to build different ones for some purposes. I see that I have a host.conf file on my

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread kmself
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:43:12PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote: > >Usually it's a problem in the inclusion of nameservers (do you include > >localhost?), and the "order" directive in /etc/host.conf: > > > > order hosts,bind > > Host.conf isn

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote: >Usually it's a problem in the inclusion of nameservers (do you include >localhost?), and the "order" directive in /etc/host.conf: > > order hosts,bind Host.conf isn't used with libc6 anymore (i.e. for the last 2 years). It's now /etc/nsswitch.conf M

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 11:26:02AM -0700, Mike wrote: > > >Try disabling IDENT in the FTP daemon and see what happens ... the -I > >option does this for wu-ftpd. > > Assuming this works, what are the ramifications of disabling IDENT? If > something's wrong with my resolving setup, I'd like to f

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Mike
Try disabling IDENT in the FTP daemon and see what happens ... the -I option does this for wu-ftpd. Assuming this works, what are the ramifications of disabling IDENT? If something's wrong with my resolving setup, I'd like to fix it.

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread kmself
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:39:29AM -0700, Mike wrote: > At 07:23 PM 8/22/00 +0200, you wrote: > > >It seems classic resolver problem (register your win-machine in DNS or at > >least add to /etc/hosts file) :) > > > >Mirek > > It seems like a resolver problem to me as well but I'm not running a DN

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 11:01:03AM -0700, Mike wrote: > I do have the PARANOID option set but I also have the ip address of the > local machine in hosts.allow. Shouldn't the hosts.allow entry negate the > PARANOID option for the specified ip addresses? > > Also, the service does start eventuall

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread kmself
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 11:01:03AM -0700, Mike wrote: > Thanks, Rick. > > At 01:47 PM 8/22/00 -0400, you wrote: > > >I missed the first part of this, but is the slow service perchanced > >wrapped by tcpwrappers? (ie: /usr/sbin/tcpd). > > It is. > > >If so, check /etc/hosts.deny for the paranoid

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Mike
Thanks, Rick. At 01:47 PM 8/22/00 -0400, you wrote: I missed the first part of this, but is the slow service perchanced wrapped by tcpwrappers? (ie: /usr/sbin/tcpd). It is. If so, check /etc/hosts.deny for the paranoid option: # # The PARANOID wildcard matches any host whose name does not m

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Mike
At 07:23 PM 8/22/00 +0200, you wrote: It seems classic resolver problem (register your win-machine in DNS or at least add to /etc/hosts file) :) Mirek It seems like a resolver problem to me as well but I'm not running a DNS locally and I do have the local ip address of the windows machine in

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread Mirek Kwasniak
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:06:12AM -0700, Mike wrote: > Greetings: > > I've got potato on a network with some windows machines. Potato has wuftpd > installed and configured in inetd.conf. sshd is also started when it boots. > > When I try to ftp from windows to potato (using the local ip addre

Re: slow inetd

2000-08-22 Thread kmself
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:06:12AM -0700, Mike wrote: > Greetings: > > I've got potato on a network with some windows machines. Potato has wuftpd > installed and configured in inetd.conf. sshd is also started when it boots. > > When I try to ftp from windows to potato (using the local ip addre