Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Alain Nadeau
> > Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed > > this. > > Sorry, I said new version of slrn, but I meant new versoin of slang. > Anyway, I didn't want to bother checking. > > > Joost, are you running slang0.99.34? > > Yes. >  Thanks to both Joost and Joey! I'

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread joost witteveen
> > > But for some reason, slrn now doesn't come up with that message > > any more (maybe new version of slrn). > > It doesn't? > > Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed > this. Sorry, I said new version of slrn, but I meant new versoin of slang. Anyway, I

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Joey Hess
> But for some reason, slrn now doesn't come up with that message > any more (maybe new version of slrn). It doesn't? Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed this. Joost, are you running slang0.99.34? -- #!/usr/bin/perl -i=-/*/~%*~%/~~%/~~~-/*/_/=~~~-/~~

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Joey Hess
> always: > "terminal not powerful enough for slang". Never saw that before. Is it a > matter of updating the Slang lib? They work fine on a tty, xjed works > fine as well. Any clue? >From slrn's README.debian: If you want to run slrn in an xterm, slrn may say that your display "isn't powerfull e

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread joost witteveen
> > I have encountered the following problem since moving to Debian (1.2), > and I must admit I cannot find the solution. It appears > that some binaries compiled with slang (jed and most in any event) will > not load in an xterm > (nor for that matter in an rxvt, itself an slang binary!): the rep