Re: size of wiki.debian.net

kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: I see a large potential for wiki.debian.net in the future as the Debian base grows continuously. But having a cursory look through the wiki, I could not figure out how much stuff it currently holds. I think it would be a good idea to display atleast the following st

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

Filipus Klutiero wrote: http://wiki.debian.net/?TeluguMusic Well, that page doesn't seem particularly appropriate. What particular relation is there between Telugu music and Debian? If you want to explain how to explain to your music on Debian, do it on your site. It's not because it's not

Re: Re: size of wiki.debian.net

http://wiki.debian.net/?TeluguMusic Well, that page doesn't seem particularly appropriate. What particular relation is there between Telugu music and Debian? If you want to explain how to explain to your music on Debian, do it on your site. It's not because it's not the official site that you

Re: Re: size of wiki.debian.net

However, I think the software powering it (kwiki) is horrible for the end-user: It's slow and the UI is bad. I'm not alone, see Since I started the page, I guess I'll agree :) Most likely, the particular limitation you raise comes from the

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: The way I am currently using the wiki is as follows: Let's say I solved a small problem by posting a question on debian-user or IRC. I will write a brief description of problem and solution on the wiki so that the users need not read whole threads when they face

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

The way I am currently using the wiki is as follows: Let's say I solved a small problem by posting a question on debian-user or IRC. I will write a brief description of problem and solution on the wiki so that the users need not read whole threads when they face the same problem. If every us

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:15:28AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:33:13AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > > This brings up an interesting point. First of all, I do not know the > > officialness of the wiki. What I mean is that I am not aware of a > > psuedo-package name whi

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:55:30AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > Kevin Mark wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:05:48AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > > > > > >>I see a large potential for wiki.debian.net in the future as the Debian > >>base grows continuously. > >> > >> > > >

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

Kevin Mark wrote: On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:05:48AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: I see a large potential for wiki.debian.net in the future as the Debian base grows continuously. Hi Raju, I was confused at your posting this here (as opposed to a more techincal list as most of th

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:33:13AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > This brings up an interesting point. First of all, I do not know the > officialness of the wiki. What I mean is that I am not aware of a > psuedo-package name which would facilitate making a bug report. In keeping with the Wiki natur

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

On 7/18/05, kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see a large potential for wiki.debian.net in the future as the Debian > base grows continuously. I agree, and I think that a wiki such as this is a great way to introduce contributors to the project, due to the low technical and social

Re: size of wiki.debian.net

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:05:48AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > I see a large potential for wiki.debian.net in the future as the Debian > base grows continuously. Hi Raju, I was confused at your posting this here (as opposed to a more techincal list as most of the items on the wiki are la